Winners only.

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 52968

And then he failed spectacularly.
23% of campaign promises kept.
53% of promises broken.
Economy in the shitter.
Foreign relations in the shitter.
Two impeachments.
Four indictments.
Executive orders overturned as illegal.
Constitution violations.
Loser.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

And then he failed spectacularly.
23% of campaign promises kept.
53% of promises broken.
Economy in the shitter.
Foreign relations in the shitter.
Two impeachments.
Four indictments.
Executive orders overturned as illegal.
Constitution violations.
Loser.

All out of spite.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Listen dummy, you can't follow a conversation for shit. Who was president in 2020 is not being disputed. Who was VP in 2020 is not being disputed.

I said your information is wrong. If you can't follow the conversation I am not holding your damn hand. I am not your guardian nor your caregiver.

Ohhhhh, you “said”.
That changes EVERYTHING.

Oh, no it doesn’t. Trump was POTUS. Invoking Title 42 is in his lap.
Wel come to how the government works.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Ohhhhh, you “said”.
That changes EVERYTHING.

Oh, no it doesn’t. Trump was POTUS. Invoking Title 42 is in his lap.

Are you saying the CDC does the bidding of the President?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

 

[Kayge 10+ year member]

Yes. You could argue that, but having not been able to be an attorney for the defense, your argument doesn’t carry weight.

Do you think if it was a good argument, the defense attorneys might have brought it up?

Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The court ruled that the plenary power doctrine does not authorize the indefinite detention of immigrants under order of deportation whom no other country will accept.

Stanley v. Illinois was a landmark United States Supreme Court case1that held that the fathers of children born out of wedlock had a fundamental right to their children

Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982), is a Supreme Court case involving the burden of proof for the revocation of parental rights. The case arose when the Ulster County, New York, Department of Social Services sought to revoke John Santosky II and Annie Santosky's parental rights to their three children.


None of these cases even has anything to do with immigration

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

None of these cases even has anything to do with immigration

He really just makes sh!t up

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Are you saying the CDC does the bidding of the President?

Yes.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The court ruled that the plenary power doctrine does not authorize the indefinite detention of immigrants under order of deportation whom no other country will accept.

Stanley v. Illinois was a landmark United States Supreme Court case1that held that the fathers of children born out of wedlock had a fundamental right to their children

Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982), is a Supreme Court case involving the burden of proof for the revocation of parental rights. The case arose when the Ulster County, New York, Department of Social Services sought to revoke John Santosky II and Annie Santosky's parental rights to their three children.


None of these cases even has anything to do with immigration

They sure do. They are all precedents used for the lawsuit that resulted in the injunction.

The injunction brought when the SCOTUS flipped the script on the “Zero Tolerance” policy.

Court is funny like that.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

He really just makes sh!t up

More emojis to show you have no clue whatsoever.
As usual.

Are you going to provide proof of children US citizens being incarcerated here, or was that just more of your bullshit?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Since you seem to have forgotten to back up your claims, I’ll remind you:

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Since you seem to have forgotten to back up your claims, I’ll remind you:

View attachment 52971

Ok show me where I said they get incarcerated?

Making sh!t up doesn't prove your point...you're a proven liar ffs

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Ok show me where I said they get incarcerated?

Making sh!t up doesn't prove your point...you're a proven liar ffs

Your words: “…it happens everyday in the US…”. Your response to my post about kids being incarcerated.

Do you forget what you posted?
I’ll remind you.
Read my post closely. Read your response closely.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Your words: “…it happens everyday in the US…”. Your response to my post about kids being incarcerated.

Do you forget what you posted?
I’ll remind you.
Read my post closely. Read your response closely.
View attachment 52972

Where does that say incarcerated?

Once again you're using "proof" that doesn't prove your claims...