Winners only.

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Why would it be a “lie”? Your timing in the conversation and your general opinions about this stuff would place you squarely in the pro-Ivermectin camp.

For example, your support for Rogan and his doctor (both pro-Ivermectin) and inferring I was against Ivermectin because CNN told me to be (a lie on your part, since I don’t watch or read from CNN, except to research old info from them).
View attachment 51686
View attachment 51687

Not to mention that you selectively sort-of quoted the information by including this: “We report here that Ivermectin, an FDA-approved anti-parasitic previously shown to have broad-spectrum anti-viral activity in vitro, is an inhibitor of the causative virus (SARS-CoV-2), with a single addition to Vero-hSLAM cells 2 h post infection with SARS-CoV-2 able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in viral RNA at 48 hr”
but left out this: “The critical next step in further evaluation for possible benefit in COVID-19 patients will be to examine a multiple addition dosing regimen that mimics the current approved usage of ivermectin in humans. As noted, ivermectin was the focus of a recent phase III clinical trial in dengue patients in Thailand, in which a single daily dose was found to be safe but did not produce any clinical benefit.”

So, it was circumstantially logical that you were supporting the idea of using ivermectin for treatment, thereby supporting Ivermectin itself.

You’ve made it entirely clear that the circumstantial logic led to an incorrect conclusion, and that you indeed know that ivermectin is not efficacious to use.
Since you know this, you know that Rogan should not have been promoting it, and that his doctor should not have been prescribing it for his COVID infection.

I appreciate that we are on the same page.
But why the lie about me and CNN?

And nothing you've shown is me saying it's fda approved for covid...unless you're trying to help me prove you're lying

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So I offer a wager; you are afraid to accept and try to modify the finances of the wager. Then you want to change the basis of the bet itself.
You want to fight in a parking lot to prove that statistics can’t be used to accurately predict a future event or outcome. Makes sense.
/s

Then, you call me an “old moron” because you are afraid to take the original bet, and I won’t modify it to be YOUR bet.
What next? Tell me your dad can beat up my dad?

Let’s do the original bet, and then we can talk about your new one.

View attachment 51688

Coward.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

And nothing you've shown is me saying it's fda approved for covid...unless you're trying to help me prove you're lying

Do you know the word “circumstantial”?
It’s kind like of important to understand it if you’re gonna’ understand my response.

Please familiarize yourself with the word, then reread my post.

Thanks.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Coward.

One step at a time, kid.

I offered a wager. Are you willing to enter into the wager? I’ll accept the finance change to meet your budget, but not the basis of the wager itself.

Yes, or no?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Do you know the word “circumstantial”?
It’s kind like of important to understand it if you’re gonna’ understand my response.

Please familiarize yourself with the word, then reread my post.

Thanks.

You understand that this is a lie right?

it's kind of important everyone knows this

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

One step at a time, kid.

I offered a wager. Are you willing to enter into the wager? I’ll accept the finance change to meet your budget, but not the basis of the wager itself.

Yes, or no?

Is this how you got laid in the past? Wear her down till she gives in and pity ***** you? Did you think you were a stud after?

I said no, twice. You do know what the word NO means don't you?

No - used as a noun

an act or instance of refusing or denying by the use of the word no - Denial!!

My budget huh? Do you think I am broke?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

My budget huh? Do you think I am broke?

He's "better" than anyone here

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

He's "better" than anyone here

Hell, I will share what I have in my Navy Federal account if he thinks I am broke. I doubt he would reciprocate.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Hell, I will share what I have in my Navy Federal account if he thinks I am broke. I doubt he would reciprocate.

Don't wanna chub him up buddy

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You understand that this is a lie right?

You think it’s a lie that understanding words is important to understanding sentences?
That’s a new one.
Do you think understanding is achieved if you get on the phone with someone who only speak a language you don’t understand?

View attachment 51690
it's kind of important everyone knows this

It was covered with my answer to your question.
You’d get it if you understood “circumstantial”. You’re showing the likelihood that you don’t understand, and will just continue along this same path of being confused.

I will say you don’t need to keep showing the confusion. It’s obvious.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Don't wanna chub him up buddy

Holy cow, have you ever seen someone defend themselves so much or for so long?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Is this how you got laid in the past? Wear her down till she gives in and pity ***** you? Did you think you were a stud after?

I said no, twice. You do know what the word NO means don't you?

No - used as a noun

an act or instance of refusing or denying by the use of the word no - Denial!!

My budget huh? Do you think I am broke?

You said no to the money. Then you demanded I change the basis.

I’ll take this as a “no” to the bet that I proposed. You must have no faith in your beliefs. It happens.

I will decline your bet to fight in a parking lot. I don’t see how a fight would prove your belief that statistics and probability cannot be used to accurately predict a future event.
We might as well have a foot race to determine who grills the best t-bone.
(In case the analogy confuses you, it’s basically offering something that is entirely ridiculous, like your counter-proposal).

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Holy cow, have you ever seen someone defend themselves so much or for so long?

Yes.
You, trying to defend your belief that bones do not have nerves in them. Lol

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

You think it’s a lie that understanding words is important to understanding sentences?
That’s a new one.
Do you think understanding is achieved if you get on the phone with someone who only speak a language you don’t understand?

It was covered with my answer to your question.
You’d get it if you understood “circumstantial”. You’re showing the likelihood that you don’t understand, and will just continue along this same path of being confused.

I will say you don’t need to keep showing the confusion. It’s obvious.

So you admit to spinning what I posted to claim its "circumstantial?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You said no to the money. Then you demanded I change the basis.

I said no to your bullshit 1,000,024 dollar bet you phucktard.

I’ll take this as a “no” to the bet that I proposed. You must have no faith in your beliefs. It happens.

You can think whatever the hell you want, what do I care what you think. You make an unreal bet, I say no, you claim what you are claiming. Yeah, told the forum you would do this and I didn't even needs stats to back it up. You predictable troll.

I will decline your bet to fight in a parking lot. I don’t see how a fight would prove your belief that statistics and probability cannot be used to accurately predict a future event.

Stop lying. Just say you are a coward and you are broke and can't take a beating.

We might as well have a foot race to determine who grills the best t-bone.
(In case the analogy confuses you, it’s basically offering something that is entirely ridiculous, like your counter-proposal).

Exactly like your $1,000 bet doubled each time 10 times. Idiot.