Winners only.

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Lies

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 51668View attachment 51670

Lies

We get it already.

You have delusions of quotation marks, and you think recommending Ivermectin was a dumbass move since FDA not only has not approved, but they recommend AGAINST it because there is no known efficacy.

How often will you remind us?
It’s getting weird.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

We get it already.

You have delusions of quotation marks, and you think recommending Ivermectin was a dumbass move since FDA not only has not approved, but they recommend AGAINST it because there is no known efficacy.

How often will you remind us?
It’s getting weird.

Then easily show me where I claimed Ivermectin was fda approved...it's simple...either you have proof I said that...or you're just a liar making sh!t up to be "right"...which is it?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I offered a bet, but now you want a different one.
OK. You seem to have a tighter budget, so we’ll do a flat $50,000. Name an attorney and I will make a call.
We will do ten out of ten, not best out of ten.
I will predict something that will happen, that is not guaranteed to happen, based on statistics and probability figures.

Statistics and probability maths that you insist cannot be used to accurately determine prior or future efficacy of things like vaccines, or seatbelts.

Is that acceptable, or do you want to change the game yet again?
It feels like you keep changing to avoid the outcome.

No ten out of ten. I gave you my terms. If you are a coward then phuck off and don't bother me again with your dumb *** 10 out of 10 bet shit you troll.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

No. The words were actually said by Trump. They were transcribed, and there is also full video of the speech.
I believe I even gave the time code for one of the quotes, so it could be cross-referenced.

If someone wants to argue that it was not really his speech, or the transcript was fraudulent, I’m not sure what to tell you.

Some people don’t believe their own senses, or the reality that surrounds them.

If they were said by Trump where are the quotation marks. No marks, he didn't say it. It's fun living by your rules.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Then easily show me where I claimed Ivermectin was fda approved...it's simple...either you have proof I said that...or you're just a liar making sh!t up to be "right"...which is it?

I’m agreeing that you weren’t trying to show it was approved.

You were showing us all that not only was it not approved, the FDA recommends AGAINST it.
Being a logical man, you would obviously think anyone who recommended it for COVID is a dumbass.

Cool.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

If they were said by Trump where are the quotation marks. No marks, he didn't say it. It's fun living by your rules.

Precisely. Spoke keeps insisting it was a quote.
I keep telling him no quotation marks exist.
He must see them on his device for some reason. No one else has chimed in to say they do, and I never typed any.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

No ten out of ten. I gave you my terms. If you are a coward then phuck off and don't bother me again with your dumb *** 10 out of 10 bet shit you troll.

I suggested the bet in the first place, but you want to set the terms of my bet?

That’s not how it works, kid. Have you ever bet before?

I’ll help you: The person who offers a bet is effectively “the house”. They state the parameters of the bet.
The “non house” person can accept, refuse, or ask for a modification. It’s up to “the house” to decide.

As “the house”, I accepted the change in the wager from a total of ~$511k to about $50k to fit your budget.
I do not accept you changing what the wager is OVER, which is whether or not stats and probability can be used to accurately predict an occurrence or outcome of a situation.

If you do not think you can win based on the original bet, then you can take a pass. Your choice.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

IRS agent fatally shot during a training exercise

The agents were participating in an exercise at a firing range, an IRS spokesperson said.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I’m agreeing that you weren’t trying to show it was approved

So you're admitting this is a lie:

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

So JK Rowling who defines a huge segment of our pop culture is shunned because she thinks biological *** is a reality.

J.K. Rowling removed from museum's exhibit over transphobic views

"There's a certain cold, heartless, joy-******* entity in the world of Harry Potter and, this time, it is not actually a Dementor"

www.salon.com

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Precisely. Spoke keeps insisting it was a quote.
I keep telling him no quotation marks exist.
He must see them on his device for some reason. No one else has chimed in to say they do, and I never typed any.

You said that Trump said it... that is now confirmed. There is no need for quotations. You admit that you said Trump said it.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I suggested the bet in the first place, but you want to set the terms of my bet?

That’s not how it works, kid. Have you ever bet before?

I’ll help you: The person who offers a bet is effectively “the house”. They state the parameters of the bet.
The “non house” person can accept, refuse, or ask for a modification. It’s up to “the house” to decide.

As “the house”, I accepted the change in the wager from a total of ~$511k to about $50k to fit your budget.
I do not accept you changing what the wager is OVER, which is whether or not stats and probability can be used to accurately predict an occurrence or outcome of a situation.

If you do not think you can win based on the original bet, then you can take a pass. Your choice.

Listen you old moron. I rejected your dumb asss bet and told you the terms of a bet I will accept. One that you can't back out of or claim some technicality. You, me, parking lot, no weapons. $50,000. You either will or you won't accept.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So you're admitting this is a lie:

View attachment 51685

Why would it be a “lie”? Your timing in the conversation and your general opinions about this stuff would place you squarely in the pro-Ivermectin camp.

For example, your support for Rogan and his doctor (both pro-Ivermectin) and inferring I was against Ivermectin because CNN told me to be (a lie on your part, since I don’t watch or read from CNN, except to research old info from them).

Not to mention that you selectively sort-of quoted the information by including this: “We report here that Ivermectin, an FDA-approved anti-parasitic previously shown to have broad-spectrum anti-viral activity in vitro, is an inhibitor of the causative virus (SARS-CoV-2), with a single addition to Vero-hSLAM cells 2 h post infection with SARS-CoV-2 able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in viral RNA at 48 hr”
but left out this: “The critical next step in further evaluation for possible benefit in COVID-19 patients will be to examine a multiple addition dosing regimen that mimics the current approved usage of ivermectin in humans. As noted, ivermectin was the focus of a recent phase III clinical trial in dengue patients in Thailand, in which a single daily dose was found to be safe but did not produce any clinical benefit.”

So, it was circumstantially logical that you were supporting the idea of using ivermectin for treatment, thereby supporting Ivermectin itself.

You’ve made it entirely clear that the circumstantial logic led to an incorrect conclusion, and that you indeed know that ivermectin is not efficacious to use.
Since you know this, you know that Rogan should not have been promoting it, and that his doctor should not have been prescribing it for his COVID infection.

I appreciate that we are on the same page.
But why the lie about me and CNN?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Listen you old moron. I rejected your dumb asss bet and told you the terms of a bet I will accept. One that you can't back out of or claim some technicality. You, me, parking lot, no weapons. $50,000. You either will or you won't accept.

So I offer a wager; you are afraid to accept and try to modify the finances of the wager. Then you want to change the basis of the bet itself.
You want to fight in a parking lot to prove that statistics can’t be used to accurately predict a future event or outcome. Makes sense.
/s

Then, you call me an “old moron” because you are afraid to take the original bet, and I won’t modify it to be YOUR bet.
What next? Tell me your dad can beat up my dad?

Let’s do the original bet, and then we can talk about your new one.