What is?

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Then why express distaste of blind acceptance. If you don't like it, then you obviously want others to not do it.


You simply refuse to ever answer any question that will show you are wrong, or don't know what you are talking about.
The second a challenge is put forth, you are bored, or don't care, or the discussion is no longer relevant, or everyone except you is an idiot, or you become focused on something else entirely.

So it's knowledge that YOU carry, but no one else anywhere has figured it out and blown it wide open the to the world?
Here's your chance for a Pulitzer. Get on the horn and get the ball rolling. You have cracked the case!

..

When are you going to admit you are wrong about all viruses being natural?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Then why express distaste of blind acceptance. If you don't like it, then you obviously want others to not do it.

I made a statement you turd. Show me where I expressed distaste.

You simply refuse to ever answer any question that will show you are wrong, or don't know what you are talking about.
The second a challenge is put forth, you are bored, or don't care, or the discussion is no longer relevant, or everyone except you is an idiot, or you become focused on something else entirely.

The questions are literally a setup for you to continue arguing.

So it's knowledge that YOU carry, but no one else anywhere has figured it out and blown it wide open the to the world?
Here's your chance for a Pulitzer. Get on the horn and get the ball rolling. You have cracked the case!

No, it's just information you have ignore, refuse to accept or haven't read.

..

Either publication retard. I don't read either publication.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

When the phuck have you been on a quest for either. When either has been presented to you it is ignored or argued immediately.

I'll freely admit I ignore bullshit.
You just made a pretty big post to prove the virus escaped the lab. The "proof" is offered by a guy who hadn't been there for at least 3, possibly 4 years before the pandemic hit.
By sheer coincidence, he had written a book that he needed to promote.

So you blindly accept the statement of a guy who hadn't been in the lab for at least 3 years as proof the virus was created AND escaped the lab.

Yet, you have a distaste for blind acceptance.

 

[djdilliodon!]

Anyone care to read and look at this

Hearing Wrap Up: Suppression of the Lab Leak Hypothesis Was Not Based in Science - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

oversight.house.gov

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I'll freely admit I ignore bullshit.
You just made a pretty big post to prove the virus escaped the lab. The "proof" is offered by a guy who hadn't been there for at least 3, possibly 4 years before the pandemic hit.
By sheer coincidence, he had written a book that he needed to promote.

So you blindly accept the statement of a guy who hadn't been in the lab for at least 3 years as proof the virus was created AND escaped the lab.

Yet, you have a distaste for blind acceptance.

Is that why I made the post? I didn't state why I made the post. Now you are just assuming which makes you an assshole. Your response though is proving that you don't want the virus to be proven that it came from a lab. You are fighting it tooth and nail. Your first and only instinct is to put down the post and discredit the person making the statements in the post. We see your goal Rob every day.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Is that why I made the post? I didn't state why I made the post. Now you are just assuming which makes you an assshole. Your response though is proving that you don't want the virus to be proven that it came from a lab. You are fighting it tooth and nail. Your first and only instinct is to put down the post and discredit the person making the statements in the post. We see your goal Rob every day.

OK.
So you posted it to show that there is no proof or evidence that the virus was mutated in the lab and released to the public from the lab.
Fair enough.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

HAHA @RobGMN wont acknowledge he was wrong about saying all viruses are natural. What a dumb f*ckwad troll.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

OK.
So you posted it to show that there is no proof or evidence that the virus was mutated in the lab and released to the public from the lab.
Fair enough.

It is a scientist that worked in the lab stating what he saw.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Anyone care to read and look at this

Hearing Wrap Up: Suppression of the Lab Leak Hypothesis Was Not Based in Science - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

oversight.house.gov

@RobGMN read this and tell us what you think.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I made a statement you turd. Show me where I expressed distaste.

Here you go.

So you can't explain... you have to blindly accept what the CIA is force feeding you. No thoughts of your own there Rob?

Bats in that area of China are carrying the SARS like coronavirus. SARS-CoV-2 has NOT been conclusively found in animals outside of the lab but was 100% in the Wuhan lab. SARS-CoV-2 is what infected humans. The CIA is doing a bang up job of investigating this huh.

The questions are literally a setup for you to continue arguing.

No, it's just information you have ignore, refuse to accept or haven't read

That doesn't speak to you forming you opinion based on blindly accepting what others have to say abou tit.
Sicne you didn't investigate hands-on, your opinion is blind acceptance?

.Either publication retard. I don't read either publication.

I ventured a guess that Buck would chime in with a link to an "article" from either of those communist supporting groups that would "prove" the theory.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Here you go.



That doesn't speak to you forming you opinion based on blindly accepting what others have to say abou tit.
Sicne you didn't investigate hands-on, your opinion is blind acceptance?

I ventured a guess that Buck would chime in with a link to an "article" from either of those communist supporting groups that would "prove" the theory.

When are you going to admit you are wrong about all viruses being natural?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Here you go.

Where is the disdain???? Distaste?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

It is a scientist that worked in the lab stating what he saw.

What he saw 3-4 years before the incident.
That would be "in the past" now, and "in the past" on the day patient zero got sick.

You consider the past irrelevant. Why is it suddenly relevant when you want to use it to prove your opinion?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

What he saw 3-4 years before the incident.
That would be "in the past" now, and "in the past" on the day patient zero got sick.

You consider the past irrelevant. Why is it suddenly relevant when you want to use it to prove your opinion?

When are you going to admit you are wrong about all viruses being natural?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I’m not caring of your opinion of what zerohedge is.

That's fine, but then don't "ask" to debate stuff based on Zerohedge article because 9 out of 10 times I'm not going to bother to click the link, Rob will probably dismiss it, etc.