Winners only.

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I think he was shooting more for sarcasm and showing how all the conspiracy fantasies start to interfere with each other, and cancel each other out.

As soon as you have to suspend disbelief in order for the conspiracy to be plausible, it all simply crumbles.

It's not sarcasm. It's an effort to point out how lazy the neocons are being with their deep state narrative. It took all of 2 minutes to neatly tie up the "why did the FBI/Deep State go after Hillary" question that's been hanging out there for year or so.

My "plausible scenario" makes more sense than the cookie cutter one @Buck and the neoconservatives are running with because mine closes the "why did the FBI to torpedo Hillary" hole in their story. At least I made the effort to address the major contradiction in their story and did so in a way that left all the major players in tact playing roughly the same roles as before.

I'd guess alot of the folks coming up with these conspiracy theories didn't take creative writing courses - too many unaddressed inconsistencies. Conspiracy theories aren't the same as fiction writing (or faith based novels) because you're asking people to accept a narrative as true. There is no mechanism for suspension of disbelief, therefore the bar for making the scenario plausible is higher than an episode of Star Trek.

People have been bringing up the FBI conveniently torpedoing Hillary ~1 week before the election and the neocons never address it; all the while pounding the table for an answer on why Hunter's investigation wasn't front and center in the 2020 election. All I'm saying is if you're trying to sell a certain narrative, put forth the effort to make it a working scenario. When somebody offers a legitimate critique of you narrative take a few minutes to make it work.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Hmmmm, it wasn't that long ago you were whining about your questions being "rhetorical". And then you were whining that your questions are sarcasm. With this one, you provided an answer to specifically make an inference.
If English is really this tough for you, maybe stick to just reading the posts here, instead of making your own.

You are telling ME I have a problem with English when YOU are the one who insist a question must be something else. Interesting.

A backpedal and spin after the fact. It doesn't change your post.

Because you declare it so it MUST be true.

A lame attempt. But now we have you again admitting to hitting women in the past, and still doing it.
Good job, scumbag.

Whatever you gotta tell yourself. I never said I didn't hit my sister, twice for disrespecting my mother. You are a bitch I'd hit for nothing at all.

And you are STILL confused about what an "internet troll" is.
troll - a person who intentionally tries to instigate conflict, hostility, or arguments in an online social community
Your posts are the epitome of you being the troll. You post shit that is contrary to fact, and claim that it is 100% accurate, and then continue to defend the lie even when you are proved irrefutably wrong. An obvious troll move.
If you need examples, there are tons.

This is what you do. The first part of the definition describes YOU. Troll.

In fact, you just made one: "The vaccine didn't cure COVID, stop the transmission of COVID, prevent the catching of COVID."
You "support" your argument by claiming statistics can't prove efficacy (or anything else, which is false), yet you have absolutely NOTHING to back up your claim, other than "because Thxone said so".
And you say so very likely because you heard it from someone or saw it in a meme.

Really.

Does the vaccine stop the transmission of the COVID-19 virus? - No.
Does the vaccine prevent death from the COVID-19 virus? - No.
Does the vaccine prevent you from catching the COVID-19 virus? - No.

These are not disputed statements and have been made by the CDC.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

If you knew anything, I wouldn’t have to explain it, lol. It’s funny how you lash out, when somebody responds to you in the same bullshit fashion you do to everyone

I’d rather you explain the connection between my questions, and your claim that I advocate for human trafficking.
Put it in words that us non-pure-energy humans who can’t explore the edges of the universe, and have never experienced brain death and risen from the dead would understand

Most people are coming here illegally to take advantage of our country. Most of these people aren’t seeking asylum, aren’t fleeing war zones. There’s a proper process for immigration into the US which isn’t being followed. The only reason you’d have any problem with what I said is if you support illegal immigration…living in a country that’s economically worse off doesn’t justify illegally invading our country. Most of these illegals are being pimped by the UN and our current administration. The cartels are making BILLIONS.

That doesn’t explain your theory that they are coming here to cause discord.
Stop moving the goalposts every time your inconsistencies in logic are pointed out.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I think he was shooting more for sarcasm and showing how all the conspiracy fantasies start to interfere with each other, and cancel each other out.

As soon as you have to suspend disbelief in order for the conspiracy to be plausible, it all simply crumbles.

It's not sarcasm. It's an effort to point out how lazy the neocons are being with their deep state narrative. It took all of 2 minutes to neatly tie up the "why did the FBI/Deep State go after Hillary" question that's been hanging out there for year or so.

My "plausible scenario" makes more sense than the cookie cutter one @Buck and the neoconservatives are running with because mine closes the "why did the FBI to torpedo Hillary" hole in their story. At least I made the effort to address the major contradiction in their story and did so in a way that left all the major players in tact playing roughly the same roles as before.

I'd guess alot of the folks coming up with these conspiracy theories didn't take creative writing courses - too many unaddressed inconsistencies. Conspiracy theories aren't the same as fiction writing (or faith based novels) because you're asking people to accept a narrative as true. There is no mechanism for suspension of disbelief, therefore the bar for making the scenario plausible is higher than an episode of Star Trek.

People have been bringing up the FBI conveniently torpedoing Hillary ~1 week before the election and the neocons never address it; all the while pounding the table for an answer on why Hunter's investigation wasn't front and center in the 2020 election. All I'm saying is if you're trying to sell a certain narrative, put forth the effort to make it a working scenario. When somebody offers a legitimate critique of you narrative take a few minutes to make it work.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I’d rather you explain the connection between my questions, and your claim that I advocate for human trafficking.
Put it in words that us non-pure-energy humans who can’t explore the edges of the universe, and have never experienced brain death and risen from the dead would understand

That doesn’t explain your theory that they are coming here to cause discord.
Stop moving the goalposts every time your inconsistencies in logic are pointed out.

The UN is using them to cause discord because of cultural differences. It’s not a difficult subject to understand

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You are telling ME I have a problem with English when YOU are the one who insist a question must be something else. Interesting.

So, a question can only be something that is looking for an answer? Then why did you say one of YOUR was rhetorical?
You bullshit so much, you can’t even keep track of yourself.

Because you declare it so it MUST be true.

Nope. My declarations are backed up by facts, proof, evidence. Always.

Whatever you gotta tell yourself. I never said I didn't hit my sister, twice for disrespecting my mother. You are a bitch I'd hit for nothing at all.

Not just your sister. And you still do it. You said do yourself. Trash.

This is what you do. The first part of the definition describes YOU. Troll.

Incorrect.

Really.

Does the vaccine stop the transmission of the COVID-19 virus? - No.
Does the vaccine prevent death from the COVID-19 virus? - No.
Does the vaccine prevent you from catching the COVID-19 virus? - No.

These are not disputed statements and have been made by the CDC.

Oh? Show us where the CDC has made those claims. Show us the datasets that prove it.
We can wait.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So, a question can only be something that is looking for an answer? Then why did you say one of YOUR was rhetorical?
You bullshit so much, you can’t even keep track of yourself.

You are the one who post statement after statement ending with a question mark then claim they were rhetorical. Perhaps YOUR memory is fading.

Nope. My declarations are backed up by facts, proof, evidence. Always.

You declared that the vaccine prevented people from this or that. Show me the facts, proof and evidence.

Not just your sister. And you still do it. You said do yourself. Trash.

Prove it. What other woman? Back it up Rob. Don't just sit there casting aspersions without proof.

Incorrect.

Correct.

Oh? Show us where the CDC has made those claims. Show us the datasets that prove it.
We can wait.

Yes, you can wait and will wait... and wait... and wait. Now which fallacy is it if I don't give you the proof you demand to which you will say my claim is false because I did not provide YOU with proof.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

It's not sarcasm. It's an effort to point out how lazy the neocons are being with their deep state narrative. It took all of 2 minutes to neatly tie up the "why did the FBI/Deep State go after Hillary" question that's been hanging out there for year or so.

My "plausible scenario" makes more sense than the cookie cutter one @Buck and the neoconservatives are running with because mine closes the "why did the FBI to torpedo Hillary" hole in their story. At least I made the effort to address the major contradiction in their story and did so in a way that left all the major players in tact playing roughly the same roles as before.

I'd guess alot of the folks coming up with these conspiracy theories didn't take creative writing courses - too many unaddressed inconsistencies. Conspiracy theories aren't the same as fiction writing (or faith based novels) because you're asking people to accept a narrative as true. There is no mechanism for suspension of disbelief, therefore the bar for making the scenario plausible is higher than an episode of Star Trek.

People have been bringing up the FBI conveniently torpedoing Hillary ~1 week before the election and the neocons never address it; all the while pounding the table for an answer on why Hunter's investigation wasn't front and center in the 2020 election. All I'm saying is if you're trying to sell a certain narrative, put forth the effort to make it a working scenario. When somebody offers a legitimate critique of you narrative take a few minutes to make it work.

Hillary did crimes. I’m not being lazy- she was found to have shared classified information. She should’ve been sent to prison, but the FBI didn’t charge her!

Nobody likes Hilldawg, not even many democrats:

https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/07/23/425385484/is-hillary-clinton-likable-enough

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/31/a-record-number-of-americans-now-dislike-hillary-clinton/

Exclusive | Spielberg tried – and failed – to make Hillary seem likeable

In his new book, “Unlikeable,” journalist Edward Klein unveils the lengths Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaign will go to avoid the mistakes of the 2008 race — when Obama famously said, “You’re likea…

nypost.com

That kunt has never been likable. The only reason she was the 2016 nominee is because they f*cked over Bernie Sanders:





Hillary torpedoed herself, constantly. She’s just so gross in every way imaginable.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 51099

Which one are you? Jim or Jeff?

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]