That’s not remotely close to the same thing. People not buying a product because they don’t like the product anymore isn’t the same as denying people business. That’s a dumb statement, IMO.If Bud Light can be destroyed because they sent a can of beer to an ***** person, then I guess anything goes.
Becasue I wouldn't violate law by refusing service to a mentally disabled person?See, just angry at everyone.
Afraid it pretty much is.That’s not remotely close to the same thing. People not buying a product because they don’t like the product anymore isn’t the same as denying people business. That’s a dumb statement, IMO.
The USSC has decided on the first two.To clarify: It's not OK to deny a customer based on religion (a protected class), but it's OK to deny based on ****** orientation (a protected class).
It's OK to deny someone happiness at their wedding, but it's not OK to deny millionaires a place to park their fortunes.
Do I have that correct?
I didn't say they're same, I'm saying it seems anything goes. And people didn't stop buying the product because they don't like Bud Light, they stopped buying Bud Light because they don't like the ***** community.That’s not remotely close to the same thing. People not buying a product because they don’t like the product anymore isn’t the same as denying people business. That’s a dumb statement, IMO.
There is no answer to a logical fallacy like you posited.It was a pretty clear question and a simple yes or no would cover the answer portion. But you aren't wired that way are you Rob.
Nature did. Coronavirus has been around since 1965.Really?
Rob, who made the virus that escaped the Wuhan Lab?
I called Trump about it. He's not taking calls. I tried Biden's office but the line is busy.It is clear you have no balls to argue with those directly responsible but would rather argue with people online and try to shame them about a vaccine that nobody would have to argue about if shady people weren't doing gain of function research in a lab with poor, little or no safety protocols..
You suggested hanging form a tall tree by a rope in response to having your arguments once again crushed.I will hold your hand once again you nitwit. You made a statement in which you surmised that I would rather fight intellect with physical harm. I said you should be safe what with you having no intellect. A point you just proved for me.
The unwarranted forcing of the LGBT agenda down their customers’ throats made their customer base not like Bud Light.I didn't say they're same, I'm saying it seems anything goes. And people didn't stop buying the product because they don't like Bud Light, they stopped buying Bud Light because they don't like the ***** community.
Ain't that something?The USSC has decided on the first two.
You are for sure not as smart as you think.There is no answer to a logical fallacy like you posited.
That fact you demand one speaks to your intellect.
Really, the virus that escaped the lab in Wuhan was the exact same form found in nature?Nature did. Coronavirus has been around since 1965.
Or are you suggesting they made it in 1965 in anticipation of using it to get Trump out of office?
Coward.I called Trump about it. He's not taking calls. I tried Biden's office but the line is busy.
What other direct contacts do you suggest? Do you have phone numbers?
You have missed the point twice. You should move on Gramps.You suggested hanging form a tall tree by a rope in response to having your arguments once again crushed.
Violence, anger, and hatred. It's all people like you have.
Bigot.Becasue I wouldn't violate law by refusing service to a mentally disabled person?
What would YOU do? Kick him out?
Why do you hate the disabled?
So it's not the product, but the beliefs of the people behind the product.The unwarranted forcing of the LGBT agenda down their customers’ throats made their customer base not like Bud Light.