Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Once in the stratosphere, these drones then face temperatures of minus 40 degrees Celsius as well as solar radiation, which their sophisticated electronics will be exposed to for months."

 
I never said they are just a theory. Stop lying Rob.
Try to remember your own posts, bud. Here are two:
1689340148141.png

1689340339706.png

Again, stop lying Rob.
You mean like you claiming you never said innervation of bone was just a "theory", despite proof that you did it?
Try to keep up, bud.

Not a statement I ever made. Stop lying Rob.
OK. WHO did you want drug tested, then? And for what purpose?
Do you think a positive test proves that someone left some medial coke behind?
An electronic bridge. Hey, you got one correct.
This continues to amuse. You gave a definition of bridge as a separate and distinct physical thing that crosses over between two other things. Now a bridge is when two things touch?

Do you comprehend the definition of perversion? Clearly you don't.
Another failed spin attempt. You use the word perversion to describe a *** act that doesn't result in procreation, but are not using the definition that describes things of a ****** nature.
All that so you can claim you are not **********. Weak.
This is true.

Does anything ever "CLICK" in your head? Do you ever have an "AH HA" moment or are you just mentally numb?
Ah ha moments happen all the time. It's too bad you've missed out on the experience with your excessive willful ignorance.
 
So then why do you make up your own definitions?
Still waiting for you to show where my quote wasn't verbatim.
Can you show me what was not verbatim about the quote, or not?
Lowering gas prices??? Really, you think that is an emergency??? Your other post would claim that gas prices over time have only risen by cents on the dollar. High gas prices in other countries is not an emergency and not what OUR SPR is for. It is for the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Given the amount of whining you did about gas prices, it sure seems important. But don't be half-assed about your complaint. It was also to address worldwide supply issues. You know, that whole supply & demand thing that you think has no effect on pricing.
"It is for the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA."
Do you mean it is only to be sold to, and used by Americans? if so, you may want to look at the CFR. it indicates you are wrong, just like you are wrong in claiming it was illegal for Biden to utilize the SPR. You can read the code yourself, since you'll likely say I am lying if i quote from it. It's 42 U.S. Code § 6234
Why else would you like girls?
Try to COMPREHEND when you read. I clearly said I didn't know why, I just knew that I was keen on girls when I was in second grade.
Why are you so focused on having *** with children, you pedo freak?
 
Try to remember your own posts, bud. Here are two:
View attachment 50309
View attachment 50310

You mean like you claiming you never said innervation of bone was just a "theory", despite proof that you did it?
Try to keep up, bud.
I know for a fact that comprehension eludes you and that any "knowledge" you have is obtained from the internet. ERGO, what you post can't be taken as fact. So, to be nice, your post are theories. You are not a medical professional so it would NOT be prudent to listen to you trying to explain information you borrow from the internet. Try again Gramps.
OK. WHO did you want drug tested, then? And for what purpose?
Do you think a positive test proves that someone left some medial coke behind?
Try to use tome brain power Rob and some common sense. Who do you think should be tested? I swear to god you have to be lying about being a fraud chaser.
This continues to amuse. You gave a definition of bridge as a separate and distinct physical thing that crosses over between two other things. Now a bridge is when two things touch?
It's ok Rob... keep picking different things to argue about. You know damn well what was being discussed. What you keep doing is being a little bitch and arguing because the bruises on your ego keep getting bigger.
Another failed spin attempt. You use the word perversion to describe a *** act that doesn't result in procreation, but are not using the definition that describes things of a ****** nature.
All that so you can claim you are not **********. Weak.
You have been divorced more than a few times huh?
Ah ha moments happen all the time. It's too bad you've missed out on the experience with your excessive willful ignorance.
Too bad.
 
I know for a fact that comprehension eludes you and that any "knowledge" you have is obtained from the internet. ERGO, what you post can't be taken as fact. So, to be nice, your post are theories. You are not a medical professional so it would NOT be prudent to listen to you trying to explain information you borrow from the internet. Try again Gramps.
You said innervation of bone is a theory. Then you claimed you never said that. And got proved wrong again. Stop trying to dance away from it. Own up to your mistake or your lie. It's one or the other.
Try to use tome brain power Rob and some common sense. Who do you think should be tested? I swear to god you have to be lying about being a fraud chaser.
YOU want people tested. Tell us who and why, and what would be done with the results.
It's ok Rob... keep picking different things to argue about. You know damn well what was being discussed. What you keep doing is being a little bitch and arguing because the bruises on your ego keep getting bigger.
Thxone POV, crossing the "bridge" from Utah to Arizona:
1689341779392.png

You have been divorced more than a few times huh?
Nope. No divorces, no annulments.
 
Still waiting for you to show where my quote wasn't verbatim.
Can you show me what was not verbatim about the quote, or not?
Sure, when you learn how to comprehend definitions.
Given the amount of whining you did about gas prices, it sure seems important. But don't be half-assed about your complaint. It was also to address worldwide supply issues. You know, that whole supply & demand thing that you think has no effect on pricing.
"It is for the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA."
Do you mean it is only to be sold to, and used by Americans? if so, you may want to look at the CFR. it indicates you are wrong, just like you are wrong in claiming it was illegal for Biden to utilize the SPR. You can read the code yourself, since you'll likely say I am lying if i quote from it. It's 42 U.S. Code § 6234
Damn shame Rob. You are a walking contradiction. You have no idea what an actual emergency is.
Try to COMPREHEND when you read. I clearly said I didn't know why, I just knew that I was keen on girls when I was in second grade.
Why are you so focused on having *** with children, you pedo freak?
We know what you meant. Perv.
 
You said innervation of bone is a theory. Then you claimed you never said that. And got proved wrong again. Stop trying to dance away from it. Own up to your mistake or your lie. It's one or the other.
I ask you to prove it but you really don't know what proof is.
YOU want people tested. Tell us who and why, and what would be done with the results.
Wow.
Thxone POV, crossing the "bridge" from Utah to Arizona:
View attachment 50311


Nope. No divorces, no annulments.
More lies.
 
Sure, when you learn how to comprehend definitions.
Here are the definitions. YOU use them to show where my quote was not verbatim:
verbatim - in a way that uses exactly the same words as were originally used
quote - to repeat (someone else's words) exactly
Stop droning on, sidestepping, backpedaling. Just provide the proof of your claim.

Damn shame Rob. You are a walking contradiction. You have no idea what an actual emergency is.
Stop sidestepping. Show us how Biden's use of the SPR was illegal.
Reference the CFR that he violated.
Still waiting.

Stop droning on, sidestepping, backpedaling. Just provide the proof of your claim.
We know what you meant. Perv.
You think so much about kids in that way, that you now assume everyone else thinks it?
You should seek help, you pedo freak.
 
Last edited:
Here are the definitions. YOU use them to show where my quote was not verbatim:
verbatim - in a way that uses exactly the same words as were originally used
quote - to repeat (someone else's words) exactly
You underlined originally. The word "Your" was used originally. To repeat my words exactly you need to repeat my words.... ALL OF THEM. Dumbasss.
Stop sidestepping. Show us how Biden's use of the SPR was illegal.
Reference the CFR that he violated.
Still waiting.
Then keep waiting.
You think so much about kids in that way, that you now assume everyone else thinks it?
You should seek help, you pedo freak.
That must be it Rob.
 
You underlined originally. The word "Your" was used originally. To repeat my words exactly you need to repeat my words.... ALL OF THEM. Dumbasss.
That's not how a quote works, and it's not how verbatim works. Before you call people dumbass, you should understand the subject you are arguing.
Here is a verbatim quote: "to be, or not to be"
Here is another one: "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
Yet another one: " all men are created equal"
All are quotes. All are verbatim. All of them do NOT contain every single word of the full texts they are from.
Then keep waiting.
Interesting, for the guy who accuses me of droning on and not answering questions.
So go ahead and explain how Biden's use of the SPR was illegal.
That must be it Rob.
The first step is admitting your problem. You've done it. Now you should seek help for it.
Lead infusion at high velocity may help.
 
That's not how a quote works, and it's not how verbatim works. Before you call people dumbass, you should understand the subject you are arguing.
Here is a verbatim quote: "to be, or not to be"
Here is another one: "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
Yet another one: " all men are created equal"
All are quotes. All are verbatim. All of them do NOT contain every single word of the full texts they are from.
Are these quotes being used in your sig to make it look like the author said something else?
Interesting, for the guy who accuses me of droning on and not answering questions.
So go ahead and explain how Biden's use of the SPR was illegal.
What you don't understand Rob is when someone engages you in conversation and they give you information, you start arguing from the word go. At this point no matter how much proof, how many facts you demand, the person you are arguing with knows you will not entertain or accept any proof or facts they give because you don't care about them. Your goal is to argue. So, keep waiting.
The first step is admitting your problem. You've done it. Now you should seek help for it.
Lead infusion at high velocity may help.
lol cute. Now, who do you talk to about your diick eating fetish?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,102,457
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top