Colorado law would have forced that, but the USSC stepped in. Personally, I don't think any business owner should be forced to take on work they don't want to do, but OTOH *****+ is a protected class, protected from discrimination. We'd all agree it would be uncool if the web designer made the decision to refuse to do mixed couple wedding sites. The *****+ community supposedly gets the same protections as racial minorities.So they should be forced to participated in something they don't believe in?
Christian/anti-***** people may flock to her business.The business owner is the one losing out...their reputation will be hammered...
And let's be honest there's more than 1 business providing the service...
"Protected class" is bs...they and any other group deemed that deserve no more protection than anyone else...Colorado law would have forced that, but the USSC stepped in. Personally, I don't think any business owner should be forced to take on work they don't want to do, but OTOH *****+ is a protected class, protected from discrimination. We'd all agree it would be uncool if the web designer made the decision to refuse to do mixed couple wedding sites. The *****+ community supposedly gets the same protections as racial minorities.
They are deemed a protected class, not to be discriminated against. It's a case of two laws conflicting (freedom of religion vs freedom from discrimination). The obvious comparison would be blacks not being served in businesses pre civil rights. I can't say I care one or the other much - the pretend gay couple can go anywhere for their website and assuming we forced the web designer to do gay websites is that really restricting her freedom of religion - God is there to forgive our trespasses."Protected class" is bs...they and any other group deemed that deserve no more protection than anyone else...
As far as the business goes...I don't agree with their stance...but if they want to take the revenue loss that's on them
That's how they turn Sleepy Joe into Lucid Joe.Who did it?
![]()
US Secret Service investigating as cocaine reportedly found in White House
It wouldn’t be the first time illegal drugs were brought into the president’s residencewww.theguardian.com
buzzloving.com
He can define woke. The problem with defining woke is that religion will closely resemble any definition of woke he comes up with as well. When politicians sound stupid they are either outright lying or tiptoeing around the whole truth. They aren’t stupid. It’s quite the oppositeOf course he can't define woke. He's just standing against any and everything the DNC is standing for.
![]()
DeSantis Struggles To Define "Woke" And Ends Up With "More Slogans And Scary Words," Proving Trump Right - BuzzLoving.com
Donald Trump went after DeSantis' whole brand, being anti-woke, by stating that half of people cannot define it. So, a reporter asked DeSantis just that.buzzloving.com