Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
'Seems it would be more an issue of allowing them to even BE instituted.
I am a full proponent of the right to bear arms, but I also accept that like many other rights, there can and should be restrictions on how they are exercised.

"After the details of Aldrich’s previous arrest was revealed following the shooting, the sheriff’s office said it would not have been able to seek a red flag order because of the 2021 arrest because the case had been sealed and there was no new evidence that they could use to prove that Aldrich posed a threat “in the near future.” "
 
You think a screen snip of your post is “saying completely different things” from what you posted?
Or are you suggesting you never advocated for government censorship of info and I just made that whole premise up?
(Not rhetorical questions. Go ahead and answer)
Even with a screen cap you say I said something different than what screen cap you post.
Sure do. That’s why I can remember stuff you posted months ago when you can’t recall and even deny stuff you posted days ago.
Idiot, a search button is not memory.
Of course not. Because an honest answer would ventilate your opinion that other information about criminals should be censored.

Seems like you are upset that your opinions get challenged when they are obviously ridiculous and contrary to even common sense.
Probably got a lot of participation trophies and expect everyone to applaud you for just opening your virtual mouth.
No, you're just a typical liberal idiot.
Ahh, resort to violence in the face of being challenged intellectually. Typical of your type.
What next? Tell me that your dad can beat up my dad?
Such a child.
My type? You mean someone who doesn't fall for you shit?
 
And now...back to the classic...





A13usaonutL._CLa_2140,2000_71a3H-GY5cL.png_0,0,2140,2000+0.0,0.0,2140.0,2000.0_AC_UX425_.jpeg
 
'Seems it would be more an issue of allowing them to even BE instituted.
I am a full proponent of the right to bear arms, but I also accept that like many other rights, there can and should be restrictions on how they are exercised.

"After the details of Aldrich’s previous arrest was revealed following the shooting, the sheriff’s office said it would not have been able to seek a red flag order because of the 2021 arrest because the case had been sealed and there was no new evidence that they could use to prove that Aldrich posed a threat “in the near future.” "

If anybody was a Red Flag, it was this guy. Dude was caught in possession of a ghost gun, kidnapped his grandparents, etc.

 
Even with a screen cap you say I said something different than what screen cap you post.
That makes no sense. Lemme guess, you think I Photoshop the screen caps?
Idiot, a search button is not memory.
Without the memory, how would I know what to search for?
Try to think about that for a minute.
No, you're just a typical liberal idiot.
Hmm, is it because I don't think information should be censored and controlled by the government?
Or is it because I ask questions that require you to be consistent in your opinions?
Or is it because I don't accept a repeated lie as if it were a truth?
Maybe because I ask people to back up their words facts when their words sound like bullshit?
People like you seem to be uncomfortable with facts and truths.

My type? You mean someone who doesn't fall for you shit?
Your type. As in: "Someone who responds to intellectual challenges with violence, because their intellect is too limited for anything else".
I could also say that I have seen a lot of right-wingers follow the same script, which would suggest you are a right-winger or at least share some similar philosophies. Are you a right-winger?
 
That makes no sense. Lemme guess, you think I Photoshop the screen caps?
I will say something, you will claim I said something else, I will call you a liar, you will post a screen cap of what I said and ask "didn't you say this?" Which at that point should clear up your confusion but somehow it doesn't because you still think the screen cap of what I actually said is what you said I said, which is different than the screen cap.
Without the memory, how would I know what to search for?
Try to think about that for a minute.
You remember my screen name. I'm sorry, was that not obvious to an intellectual such as yourself?
Hmm, is it because I don't think information should be censored and controlled by the government?
Or is it because I ask questions that require you to be consistent in your opinions?
Or is it because I don't accept a repeated lie as if it were a truth?
Maybe because I ask people to back up their words facts when their words sound like bullshit?
People like you seem to be uncomfortable with facts and truths.
I don't think the government should be censoring anything. Not one time did I say they should. Idiot.
Your type. As in: "Someone who responds to intellectual challenges with violence, because their intellect is too limited for anything else".
I could also say that I have seen a lot of right-wingers follow the same script, which would suggest you are a right-winger or at least share some similar philosophies. Are you a right-winger?
What you do is not intellectual. You're a novice at best. Moron.
 
Here is an example RobGMN...
I will say pink
You will say I said red
I call you a liar and say, I did not say red
You will screen shot my post and ask if I said it and I will say no, I said pink. You will post some googled shit that spins pink in some way stating that it is a variation of red and that my extensive knowledge of nerves in bones is somehow relevant to the conversation.

You diick eater.
 
Tyrone biggums skit in the making
View attachment 49475
That's a tricky one. Throw them in jail - that's expensive. Tell "just quit" - clearly not working. Enable them? Almost all other 1st world nations seem to have less of problem treating drug addiction as health issue. Then again other first world nations invest alot more in mental health, which probably reduces drug addiction in the first place, but that would be liberal socialism.
 
That's a tricky one. Throw them in jail - that's expensive. Tell "just quit" - clearly not working. Enable them? Almost all other 1st world nations seem to have less of problem treating drug addiction as health issue. Then again other first world nations invest alot more in mental health, which probably reduces drug addiction in the first place, but that would be liberal socialism.
Honestly I think just legalizing all of it and taxing the sh!t out of it to fund rehabs and mental health treatment would be something worth trying...all the money we throw at enforcement is doing fck all and we're just making the cartels and other extremely high level dealers rich...
 
I will say something, you will claim I said something else, I will call you a liar, you will post a screen cap of what I said and ask "didn't you say this?" Which at that point should clear up your confusion but somehow it doesn't because you still think the screen cap of what I actually said is what you said I said, which is different than the screen cap.
You're saying that I post a screen cap that proves I am lying? How would that make ANY sense? Anyone who looks at it would immediately be able to call me out on it.
Think about that along with the fact that every single time you accused me of altering your words, I have asked for proof of your accusation, and you've never been able to pony up.
You remember my screen name. I'm sorry, was that not obvious to an intellectual such as yourself?
And you think I read through every single post you have made so I MIGHT find something that will be relevant to the discussion?
I don't recall the post and then use search to find it?
Among all of the dumb ideas you have shared here, that's high on the list of dumbness.

I don't think the government should be censoring anything. Not one time did I say they should. Idiot.
Like Jimi said, you think they should censor, but not censor.
" I said if you really NEED the information you should/could be able to FOIA the information."
" The general public doesn't need to know."
" Could/should be able to get it through a foia request."

They should control the info and dole it out only by special request with a demonstrated need, but that is not "censoring", even though it fits the definition to a "t".
censor - to prevent part or the whole of a book, movie, work of art, document, or other kind of communication from being seen or made available to the public
'Sounds a lot like not releasing known information about a criminal except by special request.

Is this like your whole argument of "in" does not mean "in" when talking about nerves in bones? Just alter the definitions of words after you paint yourself into a logic corner?

What you do is not intellectual. You're a novice at best. Moron.
Could be, but I have run circles around you from the beginning.
Tell us more about how FOIA is information: "FOIA is PUBLIC INFORMATION DIPSHIT."
You think research is bad. You think learning is bad. You think that you "think out of the box" and "question things" by simply refusing to believe or learn. Sorry, those things require action, not just refusal to believe.
You get beyond your depth but refuse to admit you are drowning. It'd be funny if it wasn't actually kind of sad.
 
Last edited:
The ***** culture warriors seem to losing a lot of these cases. Are conservative judges trying to save conservatives from themselves after the abortion ban backlash? IMHO, the courts being this loaded with conservatives is a once in a lifetime opportunity. While I might disagree with their politics, if you're a neoconservative, you have small window to shove whatever you can shove down the throats of the liberals, so they should be pushing to get any and every case they can into the higher courts.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,097,980
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
20260423_214720.jpg

BP1Fanatic

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
20260419_124349.jpg

BP1Fanatic

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top