I will say something, you will claim I said something else, I will call you a liar, you will post a screen cap of what I said and ask "didn't you say this?" Which at that point should clear up your confusion but somehow it doesn't because you still think the screen cap of what I actually said is what you said I said, which is different than the screen cap.
You're saying that I post a screen cap that proves I am lying? How would that make ANY sense? Anyone who looks at it would immediately be able to call me out on it.
Think about that along with the fact that every single time you accused me of altering your words, I have asked for proof of your accusation, and you've never been able to pony up.
You remember my screen name. I'm sorry, was that not obvious to an intellectual such as yourself?
And you think I read through every single post you have made so I MIGHT find something that will be relevant to the discussion?
I don't recall the post and then use search to find it?
Among all of the dumb ideas you have shared here, that's high on the list of dumbness.
I don't think the government should be censoring anything. Not one time did I say they should. Idiot.
Like Jimi said, you think they should censor, but not censor.
" I said if you really NEED the information you should/could be able to FOIA the information."
" The general public doesn't need to know."
" Could/should be able to get it through a foia request."
They should control the info and dole it out only by special request with a demonstrated need, but that is not "censoring", even though it fits the definition to a "t".
censor - to prevent part or the whole of a book, movie, work of art, document, or other kind of communication from being seen or made available to the public
'Sounds a lot like not releasing known information about a criminal except by special request.
Is this like your whole argument of "in" does not mean "in" when talking about nerves in bones? Just alter the definitions of words after you paint yourself into a logic corner?
What you do is not intellectual. You're a novice at best. Moron.
Could be, but I have run circles around you from the beginning.
Tell us more about how FOIA
is information:
"FOIA is PUBLIC INFORMATION DIPSHIT."
You think research is bad. You think learning is bad. You think that you "think out of the box" and "question things" by simply refusing to believe or learn. Sorry, those things require action, not just refusal to believe.
You get beyond your depth but refuse to admit you are drowning. It'd be funny if it wasn't actually kind of sad.