Winners only.

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

This is what I believe. I believe it is pointless for the general public to know. There is nothing we can do with the information. Is there? It's not about censoring anything or not being transparent. It's just not important for the general public to know. If it is really that important that you just NEED to know then you should be able to get that information through a FOIA request. But tell me, how does it help you to know that shooter was a ***** person.

The last thing I would think anybody would want is a secretive gov't deciding which facts are the ones we need to know and which aren't.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

View attachment 49399

Some how this is the best we can do.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The last thing I would think anybody would want is a secretive gov't deciding which facts are the ones we need to know and which aren't.

So you think the government controls what the media covers and the information it shares?

I will ask you again though... how does knowing the shooters ****** orientation help you? Or the color of the persons skin or the persons race? How does any of that help you understand the crime in any way?

See if you can tell me why these people do these crimes:

White guy plows his SUV through a crowd of women. Motive?

Black guy plows his SUV through a crowd of women. Motive?

Chinese guy plows his SUV through a crowd of women. Motive?

A ***** Identifying mixed Black/White/Chinese woman plowed through a crowd of women. Motive?

Tell me what is relevant here... knowing what the criminal looks like or if the victims survived???

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

So you think the government controls what the media covers and the information it shares?

I will ask you again though... how does knowing the shooters ****** orientation help you? Or the color of the persons skin or the persons race? How does any of that help you understand the crime in any way?

See if you can tell me why these people do these crimes:

White guy plows his SUV through a crowd of women. Motive?

Black guy plows his SUV through a crowd of women. Motive?

Chinese guy plows his SUV through a crowd of women. Motive?

A ***** Identifying mixed Black/White/Chinese woman plowed through a crowd of women. Motive?

Tell me what is relevant here... knowing what the criminal looks like or if the victims survived???

I never said the gov't controls the media. As a matter fact I already mentioned the 1st amendment would hinder your "filtered media" world.

You said "they" need to filter the media, who would be in charge of the filtering? Every country that I can think of with a filtered media, it's the gov't doing the filtering. Are you suggesting that this power to filter our news be given to some sort of private business instead?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I never said the gov't controls the media. As a matter fact I already mentioned the 1st amendment would hinder your "filtered media" world.

You said "they" need to filter the media, who would be in charge of the filtering? Every country that I can think of with a filtered media, it's the gov't doing the filtering. Are you suggesting that this power to filter our news be given to some sort of private business instead?

No I didn't. I ask why we need to know the shooters ****** identity. So you're not going to answer the questions huh?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

No I didn't. I ask why we need to know the shooters ****** identity. So you're not going to answer the questions huh?

"It's just not important for the general public to know. If it is really that important that you just NEED to know then you should be able to get that information through a FOIA request."

You literally said if someone wants the info, they would have to get it through an FOIA.
That would mean the info is kept under lock and key by the gov't, to be released only when someone requests the info, even though the information should be public in the first place (5 U.S.C. § 552).

Maybe you did it unwittingly, but asking why anyone should see info without an FOIA is an express statement that you think the government should control the information shared by the media and by the people.
Unless the information is classified in some way or would violate a person's rights by public dissemination, there is no reason for our government to keep it under lock and key.

This is America, and that is one of the freedoms we get to have, whether people like it or not.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

'An oppressive society': Watch this humanoid robot reveal 'nightmare scenario' about AI taking over world

Will artificial intelligence and humanoid robots take over the world in the future? Why not ask them? That's exactly what tech experts did, and the response might terrify you.

studyfinds.org

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Former Google Exec Warns of Global AI Catastrophe Within Two Years

Former top Google exec Mo Gawdet says that AI is "beyond an emergency" and is "bigger than climate change, believe it or not."

futurism.com

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

This is America, and that is one of the freedoms we get to have, whether people like it or not.

That a quote from mein kampf

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

No I didn't. I ask why we need to know the shooters ****** identity. So you're not going to answer the questions huh?

You're certainly implying that somebody needs filter the media. Are you suggesting it's just going to stop someday without some organization stepping in?

Do we "need to know" that the guy that shot up the black church was a Nazi, no. I'll do you one better just keep the entire story out of the media altogether so the left doesn't get all riled up over gun control. They should have kept "the right" from reporting on all these drag queen shows - their was on need to know, just incensed the conservative culture warriors. And why are they reporting on the war in the Ukraine - doesn't affect my day to day life.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"It's just not important for the general public to know. If it is really that important that you just NEED to know then you should be able to get that information through a FOIA request."

You literally said if someone wants the info, they would have to get it through an FOIA.
That would mean the info is kept under lock and key by the gov't, to be released only when someone requests the info, even though the information should be public in the first place (5 U.S.C. § 552).

Maybe you did it unwittingly, but asking why anyone should see info without an FOIA is an express statement that you think the government should control the information shared by the media and by the people.
Unless the information is classified in some way or would violate a person's rights by public dissemination, there is no reason for our government to keep it under lock and key.

This is America, and that is one of the freedoms we get to have, whether people like it or not.

Again, no I didn't. Could/should be able to get it through a foia request.

What you are doing is arguing over a matter of it being convenient for you. You're being a clown. Don't ask any questions, just accept the way the media gives you the information they allow you to have. Don't do any leg work and request all the information... Which is public by the way.

One of the last freedoms? Nobody is talking about taking them away, you're being dramatic. The only freedom you could be talking about is the freedom to be lazy and just accept the narrative you are given.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

View attachment 49429

ESG, DEI, CEI social credit score implemented by WEF klaus schwab and global banking system

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

ESG, DEI, CEI social credit score implemented by WEF klaus schwab and global banking system

Klaus Schwab wants you to cut your junk off