Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I was so wrong. So I've been saying that transgender athletes can, could, should compete in an open division. Apparently that was an option for Lesley Mumford and Mumford chose to compete in the women's division, crushing the competition by 17 minutes. So much for my theory that former males could compete in some sort of open/genderless division.

OTOH, my kiddo got to be a ball boy (biological, cisgender, binary ball boy) at a professional women's soccer game last night between two women's teams comprised exclusively of biological women. Go XX chromosome.

 
Last edited:
I was so wrong. So I've been saying that transgender athletes can, could, should compete in an open division. Apparently that was an option for Lesley Mumford and Mumford chose to compete in the women's division, crushing the competition by 17 minutes. So much for my theory that former males could compete in some sort of open/genderless division.

Must be in his DNA to be the dominant ***. Looks like even when you chop it off your male dominance doesn't go away. Yay!!
 
Well it would appear they have more resources. I 100% doubt any party is winning anything legitimately these days.
So Trump stole the election? Interesting. So when the FBI torpedoed Hillary just prior to the election, they were on the GOP payroll that week and when they released a flimsy dossier on Trump, the Clintons had them back in their pockets? And I assume that means the jury was paid off in the ECJ case. I guess Fox got outbid in the Dominion defamation case by somebody else with rather deep pockets considering the size of the settlement.
 
So Trump stole the election? Interesting. So when the FBI torpedoed Hillary just prior to the election, they were on the GOP payroll that week and when they released a flimsy dossier on Trump, the Clintons had them back in their pockets? And I assume that means the jury was paid off in the ECJ case. I guess Fox got outbid in the Dominion defamation case by somebody else with rather deep pockets considering the size of the settlement.
Are you an extremist of some kind or what????
 
Seems to be the opposite. From most of the posts I see, he's been pretty unbiased on his views. An extremist would be someone that votes for Trump just to piss off the libs or vice versa
Everyone is an extremist now. That’s what hate causes. Blind allegiance to the power structure of whom you hope destroys the enemy of your ideas. Neither side is very informed aside from the facts they look up to troll people online. That’s how it’s possible that we elect orangutans and cantaloupes to run the most powerful country in the world, then continually defend them knowing they aren’t fit to run a lemonade stand. .
 
Last edited:
How are you so open minded to and accepting of anything that questions the legitimacy of a thing being a "conspiracy theory" but are so absolutely closed minded to the criminal nature of humans and the greed that goes along with it in getting something no matter what it takes even when it is done right in front of everyone. You, a person who claims to work finding fraud, the very thing I am talking about, are willing to make money from it but turn a blind eye to it when it is something you want. You are part of the problem Gramps.
That’s a lot of words to say there is absolutely no proof of this massive conspiracy you believe so heartily in.
None that can be found by a guy who was at one point one of the most powerful men on the planet, or by the party backing him.

Yeah, I work finding fraud. And I prosecute it based on Clear and Convincing evidence and testimony. I don’t get to say to a judge “I feel they committed fraud, and I feel they did it with intent. I have to present proof of what was done, and then show why it was intentional.

I am not turning a blind eye to anything, because not a shred of evidence has been presented by anyone yet.

If you want to claim there was massive voter fraud perpetrated, you have to prove it. Not with feelings, but with evidence.
Since you obviously can prove it, why not do so? Trump would probably pay you a VERY healthy finder’s fee.
In the meantime, share the evidence here.
 
That’s a lot of words to say there is absolutely no proof of this massive conspiracy you believe so heartily in.
None that can be found by a guy who was at one point one of the most powerful men on the planet, or by the party backing him.
Hmmm I guess it must not exist.
Yeah, I work finding fraud. And I prosecute it based on Clear and Convincing evidence and testimony. I don’t get to say to a judge “I feel they committed fraud, and I feel they did it with intent. I have to present proof of what was done, and then show why it was intentional.
In your interpretation of the "evidence" you have.
I am not turning a blind eye to anything, because not a shred of evidence has been presented by anyone yet.
Sure there has been. Just none that you will accept. I suspect you wouldn't accept it even if those who committed fraud came out and said "yeah, lol, we did steal the election".
If you want to claim there was massive voter fraud perpetrated, you have to prove it. Not with feelings, but with evidence.
Since you obviously can prove it, why not do so? Trump would probably pay you a VERY healthy finder’s fee.
In the meantime, share the evidence here.
Not my job.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,100,962
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_0710.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_0709.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top