Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Try comprehending my post before you respond to it. I didn’t say the word “care” will appear in the definition.
If you know the definition of the words that make up the definition, it boils down to caring.
You can’t be interested yet fully indifferent at the same time. Just not how it works.
Now you backpedal. Just go with what you said man. Nobody cares when you get stuff wrong but when you drone on and on it gets annoying.
I know our court system that we have used and accepted for 388 years works.
You feel the trial is bull shot because the jury judge in her favor.
You feel her testimony is bullshit without hearing it. You feel Trump should have won without even testifying on his own behalf. You feel his appeal is a guaranteed win because you feel the trial was rigged.
Lots of feelings based on feelings.
I don't care if it is Trump or Mr. Rodgers. It's a person some many many years later trying to convince everyone that someone did something because "They said so". You don't go for that shit here but like I said, it defames Trump so you are all in and will use the "It's our court system" bullshit to bolster your argument that you feel Trump deserves every last effort to keep him from being President again. Everyone here sees how far left you lean Rob. Nobody cares.
Obviously. Based on info already known, I’ll wager the appeal falls flat.
Cool. You wait for some appeal and I will wait for the counter suit which needs no appeals to happen.
 
Now you backpedal. Just go with what you said man. Nobody cares when you get stuff wrong but when you drone on and on it gets annoying.
No backpedal at all. Here are my words: “Read it again. Learn the definitions of the words used in the definition”
It’s interesting how you argue by doing anything you can to avoid the actual argument at hand.
I don't care if it is Trump or Mr. Rodgers. It's a person some many many years later trying to convince everyone that someone did something because "They said so". You don't go for that shit here but like I said, it defames Trump so you are all in and will use the "It's our court system" bullshit to bolster your argument that you feel Trump deserves every last effort to keep him from being President again. Everyone here sees how far left you lean Rob. Nobody cares.
So you don’t like it because it “defames Trump”. If it was a lawsuit against Biden, what would your opinion be then?
I’m sure you’ll now say “I would think it’s bullshit”, but your post history strongly suggests otherwise.
For example: you’re convinced Biden is a pedo when no accusations (legal or otherwise) have ever been made, but you think Trump is not a ****** predator when his own wife accused him of ****, he was accused of raping a 13 y.o. girl, and at least 22 other women have accused him.
But your feelings tell you it’s all bullshit.
Because it’s Trump.
Cool. You wait for some appeal and I will wait for the counter suit which needs no appeals to happen.
“Counter suit”? For what?
Is he going to sue her for winning a lawsuit in court against him?
That be like OJ suing the Goldman family for winning their lawsuit against him.
What is he going to sue her “strongly” for? What is going to sue Kaplan for?
 
Last edited:
No backpedal at all. Here are my words: “Read it again. Learn the definitions of the words used in the definition”
It’s interesting how you argue by doing anything you can to avoid the actual argument at hand.
First the backpedaling now a spin.

So you don’t like it because it “defames Trump”. If it was a lawsuit against Biden, what would your opinion be then?
I’m sure you’ll now say “I would think it’s bullshit”, but your post history strongly suggests otherwise.
For example: you’re convinced Biden is a pedo when no accusations (legal or otherwise) have ever been made, but you think Trump is not a ****** predator when his own wife accused him of ****, he was accused of raping a 13 y.o. girl, and at least 22 other women have accused him.
But your feelings tell you it’s all bullshit.
Because it’s Trump.
Maybe YOU should take more care when reading I said I don't care if it's Trump or Mr. Rogers. But look at you go listing a bunch of accusations. Do you even realize how much you hate Trump?
“Counter suit”? For what?
Is he going to sue her for winning a lawsuit in court against him?
That be like OJ suing the Goldman family for winning their lawsuit against him.
What is he going to sue her “strongly” for? What is going to sue Kaplan for?
Guess we will see huh?
 
That is by default supporting Trump to win.
If you don’t like Biden and don’t support Trump, then you should refrain from voting.
Nope you're making a judgement of my choice and telling me not exercise my right...how many people voted against trump....not because biden was so great but they hated trump...if they all didnt vote (like
your telling me i should do) there's a reasonable chance Trump would've won...
 
Last edited:
But that is an endorsement of Trump. Might not be an enthusiastic endorsement, but it's still an endorsement. Assuming it's Trump v Biden, I'll be voting 3rd party (yet again). Sleepy Joe is just too confused and woke for me. Trump OTOH, tried to steal an election by claiming it was being stolen from him and would start pardoning the rioters. Despite being more supportive of most Trump policies, I'd say his attempts to hijack the election kill any chance of me voting for him.
If Trump would let the nonsense go and just focus on policy...I might actively endorse him...maybe 😂
 
First the backpedaling now a spin.
You poor confused man. You still thinking a quote is "spin" and "changing words". Why do some people simply refuse to know, when information becomes more easily available by the second?
Maybe YOU should take more care when reading I said I don't care if it's Trump or Mr. Rogers. But look at you go listing a bunch of accusations. Do you even realize how much you hate Trump?
You SAY that, but far too many of your previous posts indicate it's a lie. And I provided a very clear example of the inconsistency.
Guess we will see huh?
That doesn't answer the questions posed of you. I'll ask again.
What is he going to counter sue for?
Is he going to sue her for winning a lawsuit in court against him?
 
Last edited:
Nope you're making a judgement of my choice and telling me not exercise my right...how many people voted against trump....not because biden was so great but they hated trump...if they all didnt vote (like
your telling me i should do) there's a reasonable chance Trump would've won...
It has nothing to do with judgment.
IF YOU VOTE FOR SOMEONE TO WIN, YOU ARE BY DEFAULT GIVING THEM YOUR SUPPORT.

It matters not a whit whether you like or dislike them, giving them your vote to win is giving them your support.
And if you think voting for one person to win is giving their opponent support, then you really shouldn't be voting. If that most simple of concepts escapes you, you are not qualified to cast an educated vote for anyone, be it 5th grade class president or POTUS.
 
Nope you're making a judgement of my choice and telling me not exercise my right...how many people voted against trump....not because biden was so great but they hated trump...if they all didnt vote (like
your telling me i should do) there's a reasonable chance Trump would've won...

If you took out the "anybody but Hilary votes," she would have won. Trump generates a lot of hate, which is ironically why neoconservatives love him.
 
If you took out the "anybody but Hilary votes," she would have won. Trump generates a lot of hate, which is ironically why neoconservatives love him.
Yep that was a thing too...I know a bunch of people who voted Trump over hilary (she's pretty much hated through most of arkansas) couldn't stand him...I promise if you heard them talk you would in no way think their vote was in anyway support for him 🤣
 
You poor confused man. You still thinking a quote is "spin" and "changing words". Why do some people simply refuse to know, when information becomes more easily available by the second?
No confusion here kid.
You SAY that, but far too many of your previous posts indicate it's a lie. And I provided a very clear example of the inconsistency.
Maybe you need some ginkgo biloba.
That doesn't answer the questions posed of you. I'll ask again.
What is he going to counter sue for?
Is he going to sue her for winning a lawsuit in court against him?
We will see huh?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,102,646
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top