Winners only.

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Obama was right. And arrests made under the Biden administration are higher than under Trump.
Why did Trump go easy on illegal immigrants?

There were less illegal immigrants under Trump, that means there were less to arrest. This DOES NOT mean he was easy on illegals.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Thx has the proof. He is holding out on us.

I apologize... I have been trying to find the actual study I read but it has been years since I read it. Here are some links to hold you over until when/if I can find the original study I read. The "Pubmed" link is in the contrary.

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/SORS-*****-May-2022.pdf

Homosexuals more likely to molest kids, study reports | Baptist Press

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (BP)--A social researcher who has studied ****** behavior for 24 years believes the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) has sound reasons for maintaining its prohibition against gay scoutmasters.

www.baptistpress.com

Are children at risk for sexual abuse by homosexuals? - PubMed

The children in the group studied were unlikely to have been molested by identifiably gay or lesbian people.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

https://www.regent.edu/acad/schlaw/student_life/studentorgs/lawreview/docs/issues/v14n2/Vol.%2014,%20No.%202,%203%20Baldwin.pdf

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

There were less illegal immigrants under Trump, that means there were less to arrest. This DOES NOT mean he was easy on illegals.

Border encounters skyrocketed during the Trump administration (~1,320%), but at best, apprehensions did little more than double.
Border encounters under Biden have only gone up about 50% under Biden, but apprehensions have almost doubled.
That's a big imbalance. If the roles were reversed, Conservapubs would be screaming that Biden went easy on illegal immigrants. So, what's the justification for Trump's failure to increase apprehensions to match encounters?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I apologize... I have been trying to find the actual study I read but it has been years since I read it. Here are some links to hold you over until when/if I can find the original study I read. The "Pubmed" link is in the contrary.

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/SORS-*****-May-2022.pdf

Homosexuals more likely to molest kids, study reports | Baptist Press

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (BP)--A social researcher who has studied ****** behavior for 24 years believes the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) has sound reasons for maintaining its prohibition against gay scoutmasters.

www.baptistpress.com

Are children at risk for sexual abuse by homosexuals? - PubMed

The children in the group studied were unlikely to have been molested by identifiably gay or lesbian people.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

https://www.regent.edu/acad/schlaw/student_life/studentorgs/lawreview/docs/issues/v14n2/Vol.%2014,%20No.%202,%203%20Baldwin.pdf

"Objective: To determine if recognizably homosexual adults are frequently accused of the ****** molestation of children.
Conclusions: The children in the group studied were unlikely to have been molested by identifiably gay or lesbian people."
I think this may contradict your statement that ***** are more likely to molest? But you may be supporting the idea that "homosexual adults are frequently accused of the ****** molestation of children" when you make that exact claim.

The Baptis press article may also refute your claim that ***** are more likely to molest.
Is that what you were shooting for?

"According to the FBI and several clinical studies published in reputable journals, gay men aren’t more likely to sexually abuse boys, she said.
In fact, the largest database of child molesters in the country shows that those who molest boys are over three times more likely to be heterosexual in their adult relationships than homosexual,” she said.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"Objective: To determine if recognizably homosexual adults are frequently accused of the ****** molestation of children.
Conclusions: The children in the group studied were unlikely to have been molested by identifiably gay or lesbian people."
I think this may contradict your statement that ***** are more likely to molest? But you may be supporting the idea that "homosexual adults are frequently accused of the ****** molestation of children" when you make that exact claim.

The Baptis press article may also refute your claim that ***** are more likely to molest.
Is that what you were shooting for?

"According to the FBI and several clinical studies published in reputable journals, gay men aren’t more likely to sexually abuse boys, she said.
In fact, the largest database of child molesters in the country shows that those who molest boys are over three times more likely to be heterosexual in their adult relationships than homosexual,” she said.

Hey, just pick through what you are reading. Clearly you did not read every article in its entirety.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Border encounters skyrocketed during the Trump administration (~1,320%), but at best, apprehensions did little more than double.
Border encounters under Biden have only gone up about 50% under Biden, but apprehensions have almost doubled.
That's a big imbalance. If the roles were reversed, Conservapubs would be screaming that Biden went easy on illegal immigrants. So, what's the justification for Trump's failure to increase apprehensions to match encounters?

View attachment 46032
View attachment 46033

Hmmm I wonder if the spikes coincide with when democrats were telling immigrants to come to the U.S.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Hey, just pick through what you are reading. Clearly you did not read every article in its entirety.

Are you suggesting the conclusion is contrary to the abstract?
Here is the entire abstract. Where does it support your thesis?

Abstract
Objective: To determine if recognizably homosexual adults are frequently accused of the ****** molestation of children.
Design: Chart review of medical records of children evaluated for ****** abuse.
Setting: Child ****** abuse clinic at a regional children's hospital.
Patients: Patients were 352 children (276 girls and 76 boys) referred to a subspecialty clinic for the evaluation of suspected child ****** abuse. Mean age was 6.1 years (range, 7 months to 17 years).
Data collected: Charts were reviewed to determine the relationships of the children to the alleged offender, the *** of the offender, and whether or not the alleged offender was reported to be gay, lesbian, or bisexual.
Results: Abuse was ruled out in 35 cases. Seventy-four children were allegedly abused by other children and teenagers less than 18 years old. In 9 cases, an offender could not be identified. In the remaining 269 cases, two offenders were identified as being gay or lesbian. In 82% of cases (222/269), the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Using the data from our study, the 95% confidence limits, of the risk children would identify recognizably homosexual adults as the potential abuser, are from 0% to 3.1%. These limits are within current estimates of the prevalence of homosexuality in the general community.
Conclusions: The children in the group studied were unlikely to have been molested by identifiably gay or lesbian people.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Hmmm I wonder if the spikes coincide with when democrats were telling immigrants to come to the U.S.

So, the spikes during the Trump administration are the Democrat's fault?
Can we then also say that because Trump went easy on illegal immigration, they felt empowered and are now doing it more during the Biden administration?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Are you suggesting the conclusion is contrary to the abstract?
Here is the entire abstract. Where does it support your thesis?

Abstract
Objective: To determine if recognizably homosexual adults are frequently accused of the ****** molestation of children.
Design: Chart review of medical records of children evaluated for ****** abuse.
Setting: Child ****** abuse clinic at a regional children's hospital.
Patients: Patients were 352 children (276 girls and 76 boys) referred to a subspecialty clinic for the evaluation of suspected child ****** abuse. Mean age was 6.1 years (range, 7 months to 17 years).
Data collected: Charts were reviewed to determine the relationships of the children to the alleged offender, the *** of the offender, and whether or not the alleged offender was reported to be gay, lesbian, or bisexual.
Results: Abuse was ruled out in 35 cases. Seventy-four children were allegedly abused by other children and teenagers less than 18 years old. In 9 cases, an offender could not be identified. In the remaining 269 cases, two offenders were identified as being gay or lesbian. In 82% of cases (222/269), the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Using the data from our study, the 95% confidence limits, of the risk children would identify recognizably homosexual adults as the potential abuser, are from 0% to 3.1%. These limits are within current estimates of the prevalence of homosexuality in the general community.
Conclusions: The children in the group studied were unlikely to have been molested by identifiably gay or lesbian people.

Did I not say that one was in the contrary? Do you again just want to argue? Jesus Christ man this is ALL YOU DO.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So, the spikes during the Trump administration are the Democrat's fault?
Can we then also say that because Trump went easy on illegal immigration, they felt empowered and are now doing it more during the Biden administration?

Can we say you support Schizophrenics grooming children?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Can we say you support Schizophrenics grooming children?

If you did, it wouldn't be the first time you'd be wrong or have lied. Go for it.

So, why are you blaming the Democrats for massive spikes in illegal border crossing attempts, but severe underperformance in apprehensions during the Trump administration?
I thought he was "tough on immigration". Numbers prove Biden is tougher.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

If you did, it wouldn't be the first time you'd be wrong or have lied. Go for it.

So, why are you blaming the Democrats for massive spikes in illegal border crossing attempts, but severe underperformance in apprehensions during the Trump administration?
I thought he was "tough on immigration". Numbers prove Biden is tougher.

What do you care. You are going to talk shit no matter what. You are going to argue NO MATTER WHAT. YOU ARE GOING TO IGNORE CONTEXT NO MATTER WHAT.

All you see are the end numbers. You don't care why they are what they are and if they support your views or narrative then you care even less why the numbers are what they are. All you care is that nobody can technically say you are wrong. Fuck morals, fuck ethics... as long as you can say "Technically, I am right". Just like earlier, you pull a piece out of several links that support YOUR need to argue and technically, you were right, for the stuff you posted.

Now go take your trophies and shove them where the sun don't shine. Troll.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

“It’s totally not slavery.”