What is?

Status
Not open for further replies.
So according to you, RobGMN, after this person died of ARDS he then died again of Pneumonia and then died yet again for the third and final time of COVID. Got it.
Your attempt at using semantics to prove you are right is a fail. Just like when you tried it with the nerves-in-bones discussion. Look at the death certificate snip. Look at the CDC guidelines on how they are to be filled out.

Explain to us and to the CDC, medical examiners, doctors, etc, how they are all wrong but you are correct. Just like the editors of the OED are wrong, the economists are wrong, Gray’s Anatomy is wrong.

Back it up with proof, not beliefs, opinions, or feelings.
 
Your attempt at using semantics to prove you are right is a fail. Just like when you tried it with the nerves-in-bones discussion. Look at the death certificate snip. Look at the CDC guidelines on how they are to be filled out.

Explain to us and to the CDC, medical examiners, doctors, etc, how they are all wrong but you are correct. Just like the editors of the OED are wrong, the economists are wrong, Gray’s Anatomy is wrong.

Back it up with proof, not beliefs, opinions, or feelings.
Will do... right after you explain to me how that person died from three things and not one.
 
Will do... right after you explain to me how that person died from three things and not one.
I’m not claiming or trying to prove that the methodology in place is wrong. I’m not claiming or trying to prove all of the people involved in creating the methodology are wrong.
That’s what YOU are trying to do. I accept the methods in place, and I accept that the professionals that have created them through history have done it right.

YOU want to dispute it, therefore YOU get to explain and/or prove your stance.
This is no different than if you decided to claim Pythagorus was wrong with his theorem.
Welcome to adulthood.
 
I’m not claiming or trying to prove that the methodology in place is wrong. I’m not claiming or trying to prove all of the people involved in creating the methodology are wrong.
That’s what YOU are trying to do. I accept the methods in place, and I accept that the professionals that have created them through history have done it right.

YOU want to dispute it, therefore YOU get to explain and/or prove your stance.
This is no different than if you decided to claim Pythagorus was wrong with his theorem.
Welcome to adulthood.
Cool story. So let me guess... I should ask YOU first when you will accept literal facts? Or would you rather ignore that for your views?

The man fell in the pool and drown. According to you, cause of death is he fell in the pool.
 
Cool story. So let me guess... I should ask YOU first when you will accept literal facts? Or would you rather ignore that for your views?

The man fell in the pool and drown. According to you, cause of death is he fell in the pool.
You’re tap dancing again. Stick to the argument. You claim death certificates are incorrect, and therefore the methodology of filling them out is incorrect.

Now, prove your thesis. Tell us how and why everyone who has been involved in getting us to the current methodology is incorrect.

Stay on topic.
 
Last edited:
You’re tap dancing again. Stick to the argument. You claim death certificates are incorrect, and therefore the methodology of filling them out is incorrect.

Now, prove your thesis. Tell us how and why everyone who has been involved in getting us to the current methodology is incorrect.

Stay on topic.
Wow... now I am "tap dancing"? You can use examples but I can't??? You are the one who is siting death certificates assclown, I didn't. I am telling you facts and your arrogant *** is arguing. If a person drowns in his own lung juice then cause of death is drowning. I don't care if they had COVID or not. They drown.

I suppose if a person shoots another person and that person dies you will claim that person died of a gunshot and not blood loss.
 
Wow... now I am "tap dancing"? You can use examples but I can't??? You are the one who is siting death certificates assclown, I didn't. I am telling you facts and your arrogant *** is arguing. If a person drowns in his own lung juice then cause of death is drowning. I don't care if they had COVID or not. They drown.

I suppose if a person shoots another person and that person dies you will claim that person died of a gunshot and not blood loss.

Nobody dies of gunshot wounds either. ;)
 
Wow... now I am "tap dancing"? You can use examples but I can't??? You are the one who is siting death certificates assclown, I didn't. I am telling you facts and your arrogant *** is arguing. If a person drowns in his own lung juice then cause of death is drowning. I don't care if they had COVID or not. They drown.

I suppose if a person shoots another person and that person dies you will claim that person died of a gunshot and not blood loss.
It’s not about whether you “care” or not, it’s about standards that are in place and put in place by the people who get to make the standards.

You have said they are wrong.
Now prove it.
 
Last edited:
F2442F2E-A3C5-4C1A-B309-3F54FF92B7C5.jpeg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Clifff150

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Clifff150
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
19,273
Views
815,348
Last reply date
Last reply from
administrator
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top