Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, I think voting for someone just because they are the same political affiliation as you is stupid. You want to talk about Voting Wrong... THAT is how you vote wrong.
NOW you are starting to understand!
And yet I hear something like "There are more Republicans here; there is no WAY a Democrat could win".

PEOPLE WHO VOTE WRONG SHOULD NOT VOTE AT ALL

The Republican party voter rolls dropped by 3% as of 2020. Democrat voter rolls increased by 1%.
Anyone think that could affect elections more than fraud?
Only the ones who have a clue.

"On December 17, 2020, Gallup polling found that 31% of Americans identified as Democrats, 25% identified as Republican"

How could the Democrats possibly outvote the Republicans? Must be...FRAUD!!!!
 
Last edited:
NOW you are starting to understand!
And yet I hear something like "There are more Republicans here; there is no WAY a Democrat could win".

PEOPLE WHO VOTE WRONG SHOULD NOT VOTE AT ALL

The Republican party voter rolls dropped by 3% as of 2020. Democrat voter rolls increased by 1%.
Anyone think that could affect elections more than fraud?
Only the ones who have a clue.
I see your point and I agree. If you are going to vote, be an educated and well informed voter. Don't just vote out of spite.
 
It's government work. For as much as I am sure they claim these printers cost I am sure they could have bought backups. Either way, why are they printing, shouldn't they be scanning?
Million dollar question. They had 2yrs to fix this. Maricopa 2nd largest county is heavy republicans boomers so in person voting was heavy and they ran out of paper at many location. #sharpiegate
 
Million dollar question. They had 2yrs to fix this. Maricopa 2nd largest county is heavy republicans boomers so in person voting was heavy and they ran out of paper at many location. #sharpiegate
Could be a "gate" if the entire process was run by Democrats. If the county is heavy Republican boomers, who runs the polls? Shouldn't the ratio of Republican to Democrat poll workers be high on the Republican side?
 
It's government work. For as much as I am sure they claim these printers cost I am sure they could have bought backups. Either way, why are they printing, shouldn't they be scanning?

I'm not sure what the printing is about. Maybe they're printing the voter's info onto the ballots when they arrive??? Scanners would be the #2 failure at work....

That said I do know that process is bipartisan (ie both parties have people there), so I'm not too worried about what happens behind door #3.
 
Could be a "gate" if the entire process was run by Democrats. If the county is heavy Republican boomers, who runs the polls? Shouldn't the ratio of Republican to Democrat poll workers be high on the Republican side?

It should always be bi/non partisan. Generally parties are equally represented to prevent shenanigans, then again if the county is already heavily GOP or DNC what shenanigans could they really pull since they'd already dominate the vote.
 
I'm not sure what the printing is about. Maybe they're printing the voter's info onto the ballots when they arrive??? Scanners would be the #2 failure at work....

That said I do know that process is bipartisan (ie both parties have people there), so I'm not too worried about what happens behind door #3.
When my brother and I voted for the Presidency in GA they used digital touch screen machines. No issues at all.
 


OMG, they can't figure out what caused that? It's either crap toner/printer cartridge's or the printer/cartridge needs cleaning. My guess is they had those things printing non-stop and they just needed some maintenance. Any number of solutions - extra printers that can be swapped out while maintenance does their thing, stick to OEM toner cartridges. I also question why the scanner can't read that particular ballot. OTOH, I suppose they used to preprint the ballots but after the "big lie" I'd guess that practice has gone away.
 
Isn't it funny how the "proof of the steal" that is being put up in various places is conveniently very blurry, or provides limited information that could be used to make a judgement?

Why would "proof" not be very clear and very descriptive? Seems fishy to me.
"Ignore the man behind the curtain. Nothing to see here"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,118,834
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top