Jimi77
Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Nah, you’re political or too biased, when you disregard what FL said about it. There’s a reason they said what they said, and a lot of other people are saying it, too. You’re brainwashed by media, if you think there aren’t both liberals and conservatives on both sides of the vax issue. People don’t want their kids injured. Don’t lecture me about facts, when you say FL recommending certain people not to get the vaccine, based on admitted side effects, is a political move. Science says there’s a lot of problems with these experimental genetic vaccines, and you’re the only one talking about politics here.
From what you said, sounds like when a dude got covid, that the vaccine didn’t protect him from getting, he had heart problems. Amazing. So how many people have heart problems after taking the vaccine and still catching covid there in your wife’s clinic? Might be a link there, and it’s not political. Quit bullshitting me; you’re making it politcal.
The problem with Florida's recommendation is twofold.
1) Lapado is DeSantis appointee and nobody has been more anti-covid policy than DeSantis.
2) Lapado is basing policy off a report that literally leaves out 1/2 the facts. At least they were honest enough to point out that vax risks should be weighted against covid risk. Too bad they chose to leave the stats regarding heart issues arising from covid. Maybe you don't think that's political, but clearly it is.
As for how brainwashed I've been by MSM and my liberal leanings, you want to review what I actually post here. I certainly don't post much CNN or MSNBC and if I do it's more likely to point out how full of shyt those offensive organizations are. IIRC, I linked you to the actual study that Lapado is using to support his weak position and to CDC data.
You can claim CDC is biased, but you would hard pressed to provide any evidence to support that position. As a matter of fact CDC has been "so neutral" that they don't even mount a defense to the misinformation campaigns from people like Tyler Durden. Almost all the factual data you guys post actually came from the CDC. 1/2 the facts come from studies done in Florida to prop up the "don't get the vax" politics that dominate that state and are helping fuel DeSantis's presidential run. Keep in mind this is the guy that forbade local schools from enacting their own mask mandates.
I'm not slinging BS, I'm just telling you the facts. What's BS about ~7x more heart problems from infection vs vaccination? Just because you don't like facts that don't fit your narrative doesn't mean they're BS. Just because you don't like that I counter balance the 1/2 the facts that are presented with the whole set of facts doesn't make them BS. If the vax mandate crowd were allowed to get away with presenting just 1/2 the facts they could very easily justify mandates. Would you allow Rob & Bobbi to pretend that only vaccinations create an immune response or that the vax immune response is superior to natural immunity? Would you allow me to pretend that covid is still in Delta phase and hasn't evolved into the much less deadly omicron variant? Would you allow us to pretend there is no such thing as breakthrough cases? So why I should I not bring up that the data shows actual covid adverse effects are far more likely than vax induced adverse effects? Why should I sit idly by when somebody (you?) posts that Pfizer hid 100% miscarriage rate in their trials?
You could safely assume that ~70-80% of my wife's clinic's patient have had the vax (general population is about ~70-80% vaxxed). Couldn't tell you what order they got covid, heart problems and vaxxed in, she's not in a research facility, she's in an outpatient clinic. I do know their #s were way up prior to the vax. Same group that's getting hit by the vax, younger males often athletic/fit. There is also the possibility that a vaxxed person had asymptomatic covid. BTW, I think the reason you're seeing so many fit/athletic people being affected is they're paying more attention to what's going with the hearts. There is another subset who do their hearts more harm than good - was it the case of Oreos or the vax or covid that did them in? It is logical assume that perhaps stacking the vax on top of covid (or vice versa) and then adding boosters into the mix could have an negative side effect in some people.
You also have pulmonary (lung) issues that are common with covid and can present as heart problems and cause heart problems including heart attack. Might there be some correlation, between getting both vaxxed and catching covid - sure. Is there evidence to support that yet? Ideally a peer reviewed study vs obviously biased reports issued to prop up (IMHO) politically motivated policy.
Luckily heart disease/issues have been well studied and they have a lot of solutions available whether covid or vax or some combination of factors lead to the heart issues. BTW, it should be noted that I initially wasn't going to get the vax. I got it in May after data started to come in and showed far better outcomes with the vax and limited serious side effects. I was lucky to be vaxxed just prior to the Delta surge. Again when it came to the kids, I was hesitant, but once I found out that at the onset of puberty both Covid and Vax became more likely to cause issues, we opted to get them vaxxed while they were still prepubescent.
Last edited:
