Winners only.

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

It’s amazing I get told I’m spreading misinformation, when the FBI purposefully lied about Hunter Biden’s laptop to help get Joe Biden elected, where the FBI told social media companies and news it was Russian propaganda or whatever; that’s direct election interference, and the censorship coming from that is the direct violation of Americans’ first amendment rights to free speech. Get the f*ck outta here with your dipshit judgements. It’s so stupid. The state and the media are the biggest propagators of lies for power and political gain.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So you are now OK with video evidence, and not having to witness the event?

What do you mean "now"? When it comes to ****, I have always been "ok" with video evidence.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

People are so stupid and hollow that they do the evil state’s work for them, like a free-working employee would do. Now we have hoards of blind and purpose-less morons parroting the state narrative like a bunch of lemmings. Totalitarianism never rises without hoards of useful idiots with no direction following the state for a sense of purpose.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

The US gov directly involved with the illegal censorship of free speech, just like the fascists they are:

‘“The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) reached out to Twitter, Google, Meta, and Microsoft following the botched rollout of DHS’ Disinformation Governance Board,” Schmitt wrote on Twitter, along with copies of the email. The board has since been disbanded.’

‘“We have already received a number of documents that clearly prove that the federal government has an incestuous relationship with social media companies and clearly coordinate to censor freedom of speech, but we’re not done,” the Missouri attorney general stated in a news release on Thursday. “The Department of Justice is cowering behind executive privilege and has refused to turn over communications between the highest-ranking Biden Administration officials and social media companies.”’

Big Tech met regularly with Biden officials to discuss what to censor: court documents - LifeSite

'On it,' a Facebook employee eagerly said after being asked to delete a parody Anthony Fauci account.

www.lifesitenews.com

So, please tell me how much misinformation or conspiracy theories I’m spreading, that way everyone can see how far into your soul that you’re able to deep throat the state’s cock.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What do you mean "now"? When it comes to ****, I have always been "ok" with video evidence.

Maybe semantics, but you demanded to “see” it.
With regards to Jan 6th, video was not good enough for you, which suggests it would not have been good enough to convict for ****.

Why would you accept crappy CCTV footage to convict a man of ****, but not accept private and professional footage of Jan 6th to accept it really happened?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Maybe semantics, but you demanded to “see” it.
With regards to Jan 6th, video was not good enough.

Why would you accept crappy CCTV footage to convict a man of ****, but not accept private and professional footage of Jan 6th to accept it really happened?

January 6th and a person being ***** are not the same thing. I explained the difference. I will not go round and round with you on it.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Trump is a BUSINESS MAN. He knows a lot of business people. He is going to have gobs of privileged information from these business people who may not necessarily share their information with life long government people.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

January 6th and a person being ***** are not the same thing. I explained the difference. I will not go round and round with you on it.

Of course they are not the same. But standards of evidence should be consistent.
You accept a lower standard of evidence for **** than you do to accept that the events of January 6th happened, but both require that you witness something to believe it is true.

On every level, that's pretty effing odd.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Of course they are not the same. But standards of evidence should be consistent.
You accept a lower standard of evidence for **** than you do to accept that the events of January 6th happened, but both require that you witness something to believe it is true.

On every level, that's pretty effing odd.

You're very good at coming up with your own conclusions about things. In the end, they are your opinions and you are entitled to them no matter how wrong they are.

I said I explained the difference in choosing one type of video over the other and that I will not go round and round with you on it. Look at you go though. Can't take no for an answer? You have already been told why I would choose one and not the other... did ya ignore that or do you just love hearing things repeated over and over? Is that why you are so far left... cause you love repeating things over and over and over?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 42337

And their dependence has been decreasing.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You're very good at coming up with your own conclusions about things. In the end, they are your opinions and you are entitled to them no matter how wrong they are.

I said I explained the difference in choosing one type of video over the other and that I will not go round and round with you on it. Look at you go though. Can't take no for an answer? You have already been told why I would choose one and not the other... did ya ignore that or do you just love hearing things repeated over and over? Is that why you are so far left... cause you love repeating things over and over and over?

It seemed that the discussion was still in full swing. Maybe all those recent posts were just reposts from the past?

Yes, I reach conclusions about things. It's what thinking people do. They look at facts and information, analyze, hypothesize, and reach conclusions and decisions.
Other people just go with a "feeling" about something and assume that their feeling must be correct because it's THEIRS.
They don't have a desire to be consistent because their feelings and beliefs rule how they act and react. Some people view it as hypocrisy. Others might view it as doing whatever is necessary to support one's narrative.
Maybe it's both.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

It seemed that the discussion was still in full swing. Maybe all those recent posts were just reposts from the past?

Yes, I reach conclusions about things. It's what thinking people do. They look at facts and information, analyze, hypothesize, and reach conclusions and decisions.
Other people just go with a "feeling" about something and assume that their feeling must be correct because it's THEIRS.
They don't have a desire to be consistent because their feelings and beliefs rule how they act and react. Some people view it as hypocrisy. Others might view it as doing whatever is necessary to support one's narrative.
Maybe it's both.

Jan 6th has been talked about, moved on from, brought back up, talked about, moved on from several times. The same things keep being said over and over and over. That is a fact. My FEELINGS about that fact are that the Jan 6th conversation is cyclic and accomplishes nothing.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

LOL