Why should he establish limits when the courts can do it for us?
Up next is our right to use birth control. Following that, maybe they can tell us what religion we have to follow.
Nothing like having the immoral minority decide what goes for the country:
“In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell,” he (Judge Clarence Thomas) wrote, referring to the Supreme Court cases that found a privacy-enshrined right to contraception, ****** contact with someone of the same ***, and same-*** marriage.”
He forgot to mention interracial relationships, which fall under the same legal principle.
Convenient. And rather selective.