What is?

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

You say it is chromosomes or *** organs that male a person male or female. And you have NOTHING to explain what happens when neither of those are present.

That’s just really not relevant to anything. The level of retardation is too much to unpack. Name one person you know in real life that doesn’t have either a sausage or some roast beef trucker flaps.

I will say, you may be right about what makes a man and a woman what they are. You might have a wiener, but you’re still a b*tch

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So again, you can't even back up your own thesis.

"I AM SPEAKING ON WHAT MAKES A MALE A MALE AND A FEMALE A FEMALE."
You say it is chromosomes or *** organs that male a person male or female. And you have NOTHING to explain what happens when neither of those are present.
You try so hard to appear knowledgeable, but you can't even support a thesis that YOU created.

Thxone's rule of "because I said so". Fvcking laughable.

Eat shit. I gave you responses. After I gave you scientific facts you launched into shit we weren't talking about.

RobGMN's rules of "If they actually answer you, throw a bunch of irrelevant to the conversation shit at them". Then it will seem like they never gave you answers and you can look like you accomplished something.

Go eat some diicks you hermaphrodite.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So again, you can't even back up your own thesis.

"I AM SPEAKING ON WHAT MAKES A MALE A MALE AND A FEMALE A FEMALE."
You say it is chromosomes or *** organs that male a person male or female. And you have NOTHING to explain what happens when neither of those are present.
You try so hard to appear knowledgeable, but you can't even support a thesis that YOU created.

Thxone's rule of "because I said so". Fvcking laughable.

If none of the chromosomes are present then you have a lump of clay.

It was your thesis and why would I need to back yours up?

It's not the brain -

"Do you think this difference in gene expression in the brain explains anything about gender identity?


About identity, it says nothing [yet]. It might say something. So those genes are differentially expressed between males and females early during development. They're certainly good candidates to look at to be influencing gender identity, but they're just goodcandidates." - 2007

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Again, this is Rob

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Again, this is Rob

That you think it’s an insult to infer someone is intelligent speaks volumes about you and your capabilities.
You are dim witted, and dislike smart people.
Well done.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

If none of the chromosomes are present then you have a lump of clay.

It was your thesis and why would I need to back yours up?

It's not the brain -

"Do you think this difference in gene expression in the brain explains anything about gender identity?


About identity, it says nothing [yet]. It might say something. So those genes are differentially expressed between males and females early during development. They're certainly good candidates to look at to be influencing gender identity, but they're just goodcandidates." - 2007

The “lump of clay” analysis. Peer-reviewed, I presume?
Wow, you work really hard to prove your ignorance.
Maybe spend the effort learning something instead.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

That’s just really not relevant to anything. The level of retardation is too much to unpack. Name one person you know in real life that doesn’t have either a sausage or some roast beef trucker flaps.

I will say, you may be right about what makes a man and a woman what they are. You might have a wiener, but you’re still a b*tch

I don’t know any billionaires, but they exist. I gave the statistics on the number of people out there that are as I described.
Their existence discredits Thxone’s thesis handily.

I’m sure you think it’s all lies made up by the medical community to push a Nazi 5G agenda with Bill Gates, but I can’t control that.

Like Thxone, you fallback on weak attempts at insults when you can’t support an argument. You guys have the same playbook?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The “lump of clay” analysis. Peer-reviewed, I presume?
Wow, you work really hard to prove your ignorance.
Maybe spend the effort learning something instead.

Stfu. You don't know anything you haven't googled so I don't want to hear it.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Stfu. You don't know anything you haven't googled so I don't want to hear it.

There’s the thing. I learn when I read, whether it’s a book, magazine, newspaper, online data.
You just live in your pathetic world, reveling in your ignorance, wearing stupidity like a badge of honor.
Zero point zero.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Chinese Officials Are Weaponizing COVID Health Tracker to Block Protests

Would-be protesters saw their health codes turn red and were forced into quarantine.

www.vice.com

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

There’s the thing. I learn when I read, whether it’s a book, magazine, newspaper, online data.
You just live in your pathetic world, reveling in your ignorance, wearing stupidity like a badge of honor.
Zero point zero.

Why, because I don't need to engage you in a conversation that wasn't relevant to the original topic after I gave you scientific facts? Why did that upset you?

Or is it because I told you no and your vag started bleeding and you kept nagging like a woman?

Here is a thing. How do you learn when you read if you can't comprehend what you are reading and put your own spin on it?

I would like it if from now on you read my post that you just take them for what they are, don't read into them, don't tell me what I meant, don't put your own spin on them. I am not posting puzzles for you to solve. If you feel that you need to do any of the things listed above... then you don't understand the post and at that point you should ask me to clarify. I will dumb it way down for you at that point. Toodles lil buddy.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Why, because I don't need to engage you in a conversation that wasn't relevant to the original topic after I gave you scientific facts? Why did that upset you?

Or is it because I told you no and your vag started bleeding and you kept nagging like a woman?

Here is a thing. How do you learn when you read if you can't comprehend what you are reading and put your own spin on it?

I would like it if from now on you read my post that you just take them for what they are, don't read into them, don't tell me what I meant, don't put your own spin on them. I am not posting puzzles for you to solve. If you feel that you need to do any of the things listed above... then you don't understand the post and at that point you should ask me to clarify. I will dumb it way down for you at that point. Toodles lil buddy.

Debated like a true child. “I am right because I said I am. Your facts mean nothing.”

Living in blissful ignorance got you where you are in life: nowhere.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Debated like a true child. “I am right because I said I am. Your facts mean nothing.”

Living in blissful ignorance got you where you are in life: nowhere.

That's your interpretation of it because you don't like the answers you got. So throw a fit. You call me a child but you're the one crying.

Tell me how a brain determines if the child in the womb will have testicles or not. Can you tell me that? You want to do this, let's do it genius.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Report: US Secretly Reviews and Approves Many Israeli Airstrikes in Syria - News From Antiwar.com

According to a report from The Wall Street Journal, Israel has been secretly coordinating with the US on many of its airstrikes in Syria, and senior officials at US Central Command have reviewed and approved many plans in recent years. Israel frequently bombs Syria and frames the operations as...

news.antiwar.com