What is?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, willing to concede. What makes them any more of an expert than me? They went to college and got degrees, so did I. I am sure we have learned many of the same things... so why am I different? Because I may have a different view or opinions? Are my thoughts not valid unless the fall in line with everyone else? No delusions here.
“What makes them any more an expert than” you? Uhhmmm, maybe the fact that they are EXPERTS in their field? A field you have NO expertise in? A field you know nothing about? Do you really think you are more an expert (or even equal to) than neuroscientists simply because you also have a college degree? Yeah, you’re delusional.

You are again veering off into psychological when I have made it clear I am speaking in the physical. The physical attributes that make a male a male and a female a female. I am not a psychologist and don't care to engage in the mental dysfunctions that allow these people to escape reality and call themselves something they are not. For whatever reasons they are making the choices to do so.
Gender is a societal and psychological construct. You WANT it to be purely physical, but it just isn’t. Biological sexuality is physical. Stop trying to claim gender is what YOU have decided it should be. It’s not YOUR decision to make. You want it changed? Convince all the “non-experts” that they have gotten it all wrong, but YOU are correct. Let us know their response. Let us know when the textbooks and reference manuals are recalled and updated.

I don't know any actual "African Americans" are you referring to Black Americans? If so, I think "fundamentally" they are also **** sapiens so sure, fundamentally the are the same.
I know plenty of African Americans. I also know German Americans, Irish Americans, Chinese Americans, Indian Americans, and many others. You want us to think you are world-wise, but you don’t even know a SINGLE African American? Wow. Do you ever venture more than a 15 mile radius from home?

I did answer the question on dual genitalia... I guess you want me to answer it again? Ok, I said I was not speaking on genetic defects and that science already has names for their disorders. Good enough? But if need be you can label them male or female by the *** chromosomes they have. How about now... good enough?
“Genetic defect” or not, ambiguous genitalia happens in 1% of all live births.
“Chromosomal abnormalities, such as a missing *** chromosome or an extra one, also can cause ambiguous genitalia”
So, there may be no chromosome to determine the ***. Given ambiguous genitalia and no chromosomes, what determines sexuality?
You don’t get to tap dance away from this, regardless of how few people it happens to. It actually happens to many (1.7% are born intersex, and 1 in 83,000 births is true hermaphroditism) and doesn’t fit YOUR definition of how things work.
So yes, I would like a legit answer to the question I asked: What determines sexuality when physical characteristics cannot? Is the person just not allowed to have any attraction to either ***, per YOUR rule?

The brain's role in sexualtiy: "****** differentiation of the human brain occurs during fetal and neonatal development and programs our gender identity—our feeling of being male or female and our ****** orientation as hetero-, h0mo-, or bisexual. This ****** differentiation process is accompanied by many structural and functional brain differences among these groups"
Hmmm, I could be wrong, but it almost seems that they are saying the brain determines our gender identity and ****** orientation. ?
 
Last edited:
Yes, willing to concede. What makes them any more of an expert than me? They went to college and got degrees, so did I. I am sure we have learned many of the same things... so why am I different? Because I may have a different view or opinions? Are my thoughts not valid unless the fall in line with everyone else? No delusions here.

You are again veering off into psychological when I have made it clear I am speaking in the physical. The physical attributes that make a male a male and a female a female. I am not a psychologist and don't care to engage in the mental dysfunctions that allow these people to escape reality and call themselves something they are not. For whatever reasons they are making the choices to do so.

I don't know any actual "African Americans" are you referring to Black Americans? If so, I think "fundamentally" they are also **** sapiens so sure, fundamentally the are the same.

I did answer the question on dual genitalia... I guess you want me to answer it again? Ok, I said I was not speaking on genetic defects and that science already has names for their disorders. Good enough? But if need be you can label them male or female by the *** chromosomes they have. How about now... good enough?

You have a degree? In what field? I know that it isn't in mathematics.
 
Yes, willing to concede. What makes them any more of an expert than me? They went to college and got degrees, so did I. I am sure we have learned many of the same things... so why am I different? Because I may have a different view or opinions? Are my thoughts not valid unless the fall in line with everyone else? No delusions here.
“What makes them any more an expert than” you? Uhhmmm, maybe the fact that they are EXPERTS in their field? A field you have NO expertise in? A field you know nothing about? Do you really think you are more an expert (or even equal to) than neuroscientists simply because you also have a college degree? Yeah, you’re delusional.

You are again veering off into psychological when I have made it clear I am speaking in the physical. The physical attributes that make a male a male and a female a female. I am not a psychologist and don't care to engage in the mental dysfunctions that allow these people to escape reality and call themselves something they are not. For whatever reasons they are making the choices to do so.
Gender is a societal and psychological construct. You WANT it to be purely physical, but it just isn’t. Biological sexuality is physical. Stop trying to claim gender is what YOU have decided it should be. It’s not YOUR decision to make. You want it changed? Convince all the “non-experts” that they have gotten it all wrong, but YOU are correct. Let us know their response. Let us know when the textbooks and reference manuals are recalled and updated.

I don't know any actual "African Americans" are you referring to Black Americans? If so, I think "fundamentally" they are also **** sapiens so sure, fundamentally the are the same.
I know plenty of African Americans. I also know German Americans, Irish Americans, Chinese Americans, Indian Americans, and many others. You want us to think you are world-wise, but you don’t even know a SINGLE African American? Wow. Do you ever venture more than a 15 mile radius from home?

I did answer the question on dual genitalia... I guess you want me to answer it again? Ok, I said I was not speaking on genetic defects and that science already has names for their disorders. Good enough? But if need be you can label them male or female by the *** chromosomes they have. How about now... good enough?
“Genetic defect” or not, ambiguous genitalia happens in 1% of all live births.
“Chromosomal abnormalities, such as a missing *** chromosome or an extra one, also can cause ambiguous genitalia”
So, there may be no chromosome to determine the ***. Given ambiguous genitalia and no chromosomes, what determines sexuality?
You don’t get to tap dance away from this, regardless of how few people it happens to. It actually happens to many (1.7% are born intersex, and 1 in 83,000 births is true hermaphroditism) and doesn’t fit YOUR definition of how things work.
So yes, I would like a legit answer to the question I asked: What determines sexuality when physical characteristics cannot? Is the person just not allowed to have any attraction to either ***, per YOUR rule?

The brain's role in sexualtiy: "****** differentiation of the human brain occurs during fetal and neonatal development and programs our gender identity—our feeling of being male or female and our ****** orientation as hetero-, h0mo-, or bisexual. This ****** differentiation process is accompanied by many structural and functional brain differences among these groups"
Hmmm, I could be wrong, but it almost seems that they are saying the brain determines our gender identity and ****** orientation. ?
Wow... so you just wanted to hear yourself speak yet again. I forgot for a moment what you do on this forum.

Twice I said I wasn't speaking on psychological disorders. Apparently you want to ignore that and focus on psychological disorders. You are right, psychologist know more about psychology than I do. You have made it clear though that you don't want to have a conversation on the same topic so I won't attempt it anymore.

I seriously don't know which parts if any of my post you actually read because some of your responses come off as you out right ignored shit I said because I stated the same things you did and agreed with you on others and you still argued.

For the third time, I am not speaking on genetic defects. Why are you pushing it as a topic? They have NOTHING to do with what determines what a male an female are that develop normally. I gave you my thoughts on what makes a male a male and a female a female and you launched into what if's, genetic defects, mental disorders and none of them change biological and scientific facts that human males produce sperm and human females produce the eggs which the sperm fertilizes to make another human. PERIOD. Human males CAN NOT CARRY A CHILD IN THEIR WOMBS because they don't have them and human females CAN NOT PRODUCE SPERM.

ANYTHING else that is used to try to change these biological and scientific facts is either going to be a physical defect or abnormality or a mental disorder. PERIOD. I am done arguing with you about this on topics that should not have even been brought up in this discussion.
 
Last edited:
You have a degree? In what field? I know that it isn't in mathematics.
Nope, wasn't in math. But it is a Science and it's about as much your business as me knowing your personal home address.

On your "African American" comment/response. I am not sure why you wanted to be a smart asss about it or why you call a person an African American just because they are black. Just because they are black doesn't mean they come from Africa and in fact I have only in my life ever spoken to one Black woman who actually came from a country in Africa. Nice lady too with some great stories. Kinda racist on your part to assume that they are African because they are black.

Growing up in Florida I was around many people from the islands... Didn't assume they were Africans just because they were black. Born in this country then they are Americans. Please stop being racist. If you want to be a bigot... be one towards far left liberals.
 
Wow... so you just wanted to hear yourself speak yet again. I forgot for a moment what you do on this forum.
I was replying to your post. Are we back to that shit where you are upset that your posts get responses that are something other than a participation trophy and a backslap? Grow the fvck up.

Twice I said I wasn't speaking on psychological disorders. Apparently you want to ignore that and focus on psychological disorders. You are right, psychologist know more about psychology than I do. You have made it clear though that you don't want to have a conversation on the same topic so I won't attempt it anymore.
"Psychological disorders". I guess you missed the part about the physical development of the brain having a ****** component, plus the fact that you don't understand gender versus *** versus sexuality, and so you use the terms interchangeably and in the incorrect context.
A hint: If you want to claim you know things, at least try to use the terms properly, in the correct context.


I seriously don't know which parts if any of my post you actually read because some of your responses come off as you out right ignored shit I said because I stated the same things you did and agreed with you on others and you still argued.

For the third time, I am not speaking on genetic defects. Why are you pushing it as a topic? They have NOTHING to do with what determines what a male an female are that develop normally. I gave you my thoughts on what makes a male a male and a female a female and you launched into what if's, genetic defects, mental disorders and none of them change biological and scientific facts that human males produce sperm and human females produce the eggs which the sperm fertilizes to make another human. PERIOD. Human males CAN NOT CARRY A CHILD IN THEIR WOMBS because they don't have them and human females CAN NOT PRODUCE SPERM.
The point is, you can't just ignore "genetic defects" when you make the absolute claim that the human brain does not determine someone's sexuality. The fact is, those "defects" are what invalidate your "scientific evaluation" regarding the brain. You can't do that. As soon as there is one example that invalidates your thesis, the thesis collapses.
You should know that with your advanced college degree and extensive knowledge that exceeds all the other experts in various fields.


ANYTHING else that is used to try to change these biological and scientific facts is either going to be a physical defect or abnormality or a mental disorder. PERIOD. I am done arguing with you about this on topics that should not have even been brought up in this discussion.
"Used to try to change these...facts". Uhmm like the fact that nature doesn't just follow along and make your thesis correct? Again, you can't create an absolute that is not absolute.
"EVERY human has two arms, two legs, two feet, two hand, ten fingers, ten toes". Except the ones that don't, which destroys the thesis. Your thesis is that the organs or the chromosomes determine sexuality and gender, not the brain. And you conveniently ignore the population that is born without the organs or the chromosomes that are needed to support your thesis.

And yes, you are done arguing. It's easier than trying to support your personal thesis that you have so far failed to. I do appreciate though that you aren't just falling back on the playground namecalling nonsense.
 
Nope, wasn't in math. But it is a Science and it's about as much your business as me knowing your personal home address.

On your "African American" comment/response. I am not sure why you wanted to be a smart asss about it or why you call a person an African American just because they are black. Just because they are black doesn't mean they come from Africa and in fact I have only in my life ever spoken to one Black woman who actually came from a country in Africa. Nice lady too with some great stories. Kinda racist on your part to assume that they are African because they are black.

Growing up in Florida I was around many people from the islands... Didn't assume they were Africans just because they were black. Born in this country then they are Americans. Please stop being racist. If you want to be a bigot... be one towards far left liberals.
What makes you think I assume everyone with dark skin is African American (even though all dark skin is ultimately traced back to that continent)? I don't call my Jamaican friend African American. He's Jamaican American. I don't call my Chinese coworker Japanese simply because she has Asian features.
I grew up very close to what is/was considered the melting pot of the US. There are very few nationalities I have not encountered. And I respect the heritage each person has.

Interesting that you deny someone's heritage simply because they are born here. "African American" means American of African descent. As does German American, Japanese American, Italian American.
Is it your personal rule as a college scholar and expert that American-born means heritage is erased or not allowed to be expressed? (Yes, I am totally busting your balls about your claim that your degree makes you as much an expert as anyone else in any field. Roll with it.)
 
Last edited:
Wow... so you just wanted to hear yourself speak yet again. I forgot for a moment what you do on this forum.
I was replying to your post. Are we back to that shit where you are upset that your posts get responses that are something other than a participation trophy and a backslap? Grow the fvck up.

Twice I said I wasn't speaking on psychological disorders. Apparently you want to ignore that and focus on psychological disorders. You are right, psychologist know more about psychology than I do. You have made it clear though that you don't want to have a conversation on the same topic so I won't attempt it anymore.
"Psychological disorders". I guess you missed the part about the physical development of the brain having a ****** component, plus the fact that you don't understand gender versus *** versus sexuality, and so you use the terms interchangeably and in the incorrect context.
A hint: If you want to claim you know things, at least try to use the terms properly, in the correct context.


I seriously don't know which parts if any of my post you actually read because some of your responses come off as you out right ignored shit I said because I stated the same things you did and agreed with you on others and you still argued.

For the third time, I am not speaking on genetic defects. Why are you pushing it as a topic? They have NOTHING to do with what determines what a male an female are that develop normally. I gave you my thoughts on what makes a male a male and a female a female and you launched into what if's, genetic defects, mental disorders and none of them change biological and scientific facts that human males produce sperm and human females produce the eggs which the sperm fertilizes to make another human. PERIOD. Human males CAN NOT CARRY A CHILD IN THEIR WOMBS because they don't have them and human females CAN NOT PRODUCE SPERM.
The point is, you can't just ignore "genetic defects" when you make the absolute claim that the human brain does not determine someone's sexuality. The fact is, those "defects" are what invalidate your "scientific evaluation" regarding the brain. You can't do that. As soon as there is one example that invalidates your thesis, the thesis collapses.
You should know that with your advanced college degree and extensive knowledge that exceeds all the other experts in various fields.


ANYTHING else that is used to try to change these biological and scientific facts is either going to be a physical defect or abnormality or a mental disorder. PERIOD. I am done arguing with you about this on topics that should not have even been brought up in this discussion.
"Used to try to change these...facts". Uhmm like the fact that nature doesn't just follow along and make your thesis correct? Again, you can't create an absolute that is not absolute.
"EVERY human has two arms, two legs, two feet, two hand, ten fingers, ten toes". Except the ones that don't, which destroys the thesis. Your thesis is that the organs or the chromosomes determine sexuality and gender, not the brain. And you conveniently ignore the population that is born without the organs or the chromosomes that are needed to support your thesis.

And yes, you are done arguing. It's easier than trying to support your personal thesis that you have so far failed to. I do appreciate though that you aren't just falling back on the playground namecalling nonsense.
I suppose we are back to it.

To your point that I am using the term interchangeably... That is an incorrect statement. YOURSELF and all the people with mental defects are using the term that way. Not me. Gender is Male or Female. Period. I can say this because I don't care if I hurt their feelings and I have no intentions of bowing to their mental issues because they couldn't cancel me if they tried.

What was the original question? Because this has gotten off course.

Was it not - What makes a male and female? <--- simplified question.

Can a man grow a baby inside him?
Can a man produce fertile eggs inside his body?

Can a woman sustain an erection and ejaculate from that erection?
Can a woman fertilize a human egg with her sperm?
 
Last edited:
What makes you think I assume everyone with dar'kl skin is African American (even though all dark skin is ultimately traced back to that continent)? I don't call my Jamaican friend African American. He's Jamaican American. I don't call my Chinese coworker Japanese simply because she has Asian features.
I grew up very close to what is/was considered the melting pot of the US. There are very few nationalities I have not encountered. And I respect the heritage each person has.

Interesting that you deny someone's heritage simply because they are born here. "African American" means American of African descent. As does German American, Japanese American, Italian American.
Is it your personal rule as a college scholar and expert that American-born means heritage is erased or not allowed to be expressed? (Yes, I am totally busting your balls about your claim that your degree makes you as much an expert as anyone else in any field. Roll with it.)
So by looking at a person you can determine if they are of African decent and if they are also American? Really? Presumptuous?

Also, how can I "Deny" someones heritage if I don't know what it is?

My family comes from mostly Native Americans... Dark skin... they did not come from Africa.
 
I suppose we are back to it.

To your point that I am using the term interchangeably... That is an incorrect statement. YOURSELF and all the people with mental defects are using the term that way. Not me. Gender is Male or Female. Period. I can say this because I don't care if I hurt their feelings and I have no intentions of bowing to their mental issues because they couldn't cancel me if they tried.

What was the original question? Because this has gotten off course.

Was it not - What makes a male and female? <--- simplified question.

Can a man grow a baby inside him?
Can a man produce fertile eggs inside his body?

Can a woman sustain an erection and ejaculate from that erection?
Can a woman fertilize a human egg with her sperm?
So all the experts in the fields that determine this stuff have mental defects and got it wrong, but YOU with all your vast knowledge and college diploma have it figured out right?
Sorry bub, but you truly do have delusions of grandeur. THAT is for sure a mental defect.

All of your examples speak to s physical trait determining sexuality, and ignoring the brain.

Answer my simple question: What determines the sexuality of a person born with ambiguous organs and no chromosomal determination of their ***?
Such people exist, and in far larger numbers than you care to believe.

Again, even the existence of ONE puts a d we not in your thesis. But go ahead and answer the question.
It should not be a problem for an expert such as yourself.
 
So by looking at a person you can determine if they are of African decent and if they are also American? Really? Presumptuous?

Also, how can I "Deny" someones heritage if I don't know what it is?


My family comes from mostly Native Americans... Dark skin... they did not come from Africa.
I am interested in you sharing where I made such a claim or such presumption.
Feel free to quote it.

“The evolution of dark skin is believed to have begun around 1.2 million years ago, in light-skinned early hominid species after they moved from the equatorial rainforest to the sunny savannas.”
Study hint: Look up where the savannas are. It ain’t Georgia or even Asia (where your ancestors migrated from).

Here's the thing: It seems to bug the shit out of you, Buck, Sluggo, etc. that I reference info from many sources that are public knowledge, verifiable, and found via Google. What you don't see is that a whole lot of the things I say are from memory, and if I question my memory at all, I check sources to make sure I am getting it right.
You have a habit of just slinging shit and you either believe it's right or hope it's right, yet still defend it to the death even when proved wrong. It can be admirable to fight for your beliefs, but it can also make you look REALLY dumb when you do it in the face of incontrovertible proof that you are wrong.
Like following the "winning" stock all the way to bankruptcy, and INSISTING you picked the right one.
 
Last edited:
So all the experts in the fields that determine this stuff have mental defects and got it wrong, but YOU with all your vast knowledge and college diploma have it figured out right?
Sorry bub, but you truly do have delusions of grandeur. THAT is for sure a mental defect.

All of your examples speak to s physical trait determining sexuality, and ignoring the brain.

Answer my simple question: What determines the sexuality of a person born with ambiguous organs and no chromosomal determination of their ***?
Such people exist, and in far larger numbers than you care to believe.

Again, even the existence of ONE puts a d we not in your thesis. But go ahead and answer the question.
It should not be a problem for an expert such as yourself.

You are speaking about how people look at themselves mentally and emotionally. I am not. I don't care how or why a person who is a biological female calls themselves a boy. I am not a psychologist. I do not care to discuss these mental disorders and they are mental disorders. Defend them all you want. It will not change the fact that no matter how much they wish to be a boy, biologically she is a girl.

Since you are being an assshole, why don't you go fuuck yourself.
 
I am interested in you sharing where I made such a claim or such presumption.
Feel free to quote it.

“The evolution of dark skin is believed to have begun around 1.2 million years ago, in light-skinned early hominid species after they moved from the equatorial rainforest to the sunny savannas.”
Study hint: Look up where the savannas are. It ain’t Georgia or even Asia (where your ancestors migrated from).

Here's the thing: It seems to bug the shit out of you, Buck, Sluggo, etc. that I reference info from many sources that are public knowledge, verifiable, and found via Google. What you don't see is that a whole lot of the things I say are from memory, and if I question my memory at all, I check sources to make sure I am getting it right.
You have a habit of just slinging shit and you either believe it's right or hope it's right, yet still defend it to the death even when proved wrong. It can be admirable to fight for your beliefs, but it can also make you look REALLY dumb when you do it in the face of incontrovertible proof that you are wrong.
Like following the "winning" stock all the way to bankruptcy, and INSISTING you picked the right one.
Do you sit and practice all this shit? Or have you just puked it out enough on many forums that it's like second nature to you?

Ok, I will bite. Who were you talking about when you ask this question?

"Does this also apply to recent changes, such as African Americans no longer being considered fundamentally different from caucasians?" Were you talking about the white ones, black ones, Ethiopians, those from the Congo.... which "African American's" were you speaking on?
 
Nope, wasn't in math. But it is a Science and it's about as much your business as me knowing your personal home address.

On your "African American" comment/response. I am not sure why you wanted to be a smart asss about it or why you call a person an African American just because they are black. Just because they are black doesn't mean they come from Africa and in fact I have only in my life ever spoken to one Black woman who actually came from a country in Africa. Nice lady too with some great stories. Kinda racist on your part to assume that they are African because they are black.

Growing up in Florida I was around many people from the islands... Didn't assume they were Africans just because they were black. Born in this country then they are Americans. Please stop being racist. If you want to be a bigot... be one towards far left liberals.

Nice racist try. When did I say African American?
 
You are speaking about how people look at themselves mentally and emotionally. I am not. I don't care how or why a person who is a biological female calls themselves a boy. I am not a psychologist. I do not care to discuss these mental disorders and they are mental disorders. Defend them all you want. It will not change the fact that no matter how much they wish to be a boy, biologically she is a girl.

Since you are being an assshole, why don't you go fuuck yourself.
In other words, the human brain has no relevance to who we are, because you don’t care for it to, and don’t care what the experts say.
Amazing bit of entitlement there.

Yep. The “go fuuck yourself” stance. A stronghold of the well-educated argument, posited by a self-proclaimed expert.
Mmm hmmm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Clifff150

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Clifff150
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
19,273
Views
797,464
Last reply date
Last reply from
administrator
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top