What is?

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I am gonna go out on a limb and just "guess" that you don't get this because you are unaware of RobGMN's reference to the brain controlling gender. So I will pass on an insult.

It's amazing that you know more than all the scientists, psychologists, psychiatrists, and other experts out there. A century or more of studies, but YOU know they are all wrong.
And, you are an expert in multiple fields! First it was etymology, then mathematics, now it's the psychology of the human brain.
Amazing.

Lemme guess: you "did your own research"?
Yeahhhh, THAT'S it.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

It's amazing that you know more than all the scientists, psychologists, psychiatrists, and other experts out there. A century or more of studies, but YOU know they are all wrong.
And, you are an expert in multiple fields! First it was etymology, then mathematics, now it's the psychology of the human brain.
Amazing.

Lemme guess: you "did your own research"?
Yeahhhh, THAT'S it.

No, I don't want to step on toes. Clearly the expert labels fall on your shoulders since everyone YOU speak to is wrong and apparently YOU know it.

I will just sit back with my paper from college happy in the knowledge that I am right that the brain does not determine gender. Hey, Rob... is Biology a science?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

No, I don't want to step on toes. Clearly the expert labels fall on your shoulders since everyone YOU speak to is wrong and apparently YOU know it.

I will just sit back with my paper from college happy in the knowledge that I am right that the brain does not determine gender. Hey, Rob... is Biology a science?

Ohhh, you wrote a paper in college? Well shit, I had no idea! You should probably submit it to OED, AMA, APA, ISC, ICM at the very least. I'm sure they will all bow down to your knowledge and admit everything prior to your PAPER was wrong.

I assume you're also able to refute known knowledge of physics?

BTW - You should look up what the word gender actually means. Using it in the context you have here makes you wrong TWICE, lol. Biology is a science. And gender is not determined with biology.
Maybe you need to go back to school and write a paper that doesn't get a failing grade.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Ohhh, you wrote a paper in college? Well shit, I had no idea! You should probably submit it to OED, AMA, APA, ISC, ICM at the very least. I'm sure they will all bow down to your knowledge and admit everything prior to your PAPER was wrong.

I assume you're also able to refute known knowledge of physics?

BTW - You should look up what the word gender actually means. Using it in the context you have here makes you wrong TWICE, lol. Biology is a science. And gender is not determined with biology.
Maybe you need to go back to school and write a paper that doesn't get a failing grade.

Did I say I wrote a paper? My paper, as in my degree. I am sure you are smarter than those who taught me.

You gonna try to tell all the world the penis has nothing to do with biology? You gonna tell the world that the human with a penis is a goat or something because his brain is telling him that? Do me a favor and don't speak about context anymore since you fail to get it right every time you argue with anyone.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Did I say I wrote a paper? My paper, as in my degree. I am sure you are smarter than those who taught me.

You gonna try to tell all the world the penis has nothing to do with biology? You gonna tell the world that the human with a penis is a goat or something because his brain is telling him that? Do me a favor and don't speak about context anymore since you fail to get it right every time you argue with anyone.

Ahhh, "degree". I usually call a degree "a degree". A "paper" is something I wrote and submitted to a professor. And I got a grade (not a "letter").

No. I said biology is a science and biology doesn't determine gender. HERE is the context YOU placed the terms in. YOUR words: "I am right that the brain does not determine gender. Hey, Rob... is Biology a science? "

Are you going to backpedal and claim these are two completely separate thoughts, not related, and that you weren't inferring that biology determines one's gender?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Ahhh, "degree". I usually call a degree "a degree". A "paper" is something I wrote and submitted to a professor. And I got a grade (not a "letter").

No. I said biology is a science and biology doesn't determine gender. HERE is the context YOU placed the terms in. YOUR words: "I am right that the brain does not determine gender. Hey, Rob... is Biology a science? "

Are you going to backpedal and claim these are two completely separate thoughts, not related, and that you weren't inferring that biology determines one's gender?

Rob, "Gender" has only recently been altered in it's definition. It does still mean Male and Female though. I would be willing to concede that there are two main "genders" now with many subcategories for all of the people with mental issues. Because even though they want to be unique they are still grouping themselves. But this is what happens when you cater to peoples emotions just for votes.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Rob, "Gender" has only recently been altered in it's definition. It does still mean Male and Female though. I would be willing to concede that there are two main "genders" now with many subcategories for all of the people with mental issues. Because even though they want to be unique they are still grouping themselves. But this is what happens when you cater to peoples emotions just for votes.

You are “willing to concede” to what the experts say, even though you are the penultimate expert based on getting a college degree?
Wow. Delusions of grandeur much?

So let me ask this, which votes were being garnered during the past 100 years of study of psychology, sexuality, and brain function?

Does this also apply to recent changes, such as African Americans no longer being considered fundamentally different from caucasians?

And, when are you going to answer to the question of people who are born with dual genitalia, or no genitalia? Who or what makes the decision as to what *** they are?
It’s a big part of your claim that the brain does not determine one's sexuality.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You are “willing to concede” to what the experts say, even though you are the penultimate expert based on getting a college degree?
Wow. Delusions of grandeur much?

So let me ask this, which votes were being garnered during the past 100 years of study of psychology, sexuality, and brain function?

Does this also apply to recent changes, such as African Americans no longer being considered fundamentally different from caucasians?

And, when are you going to answer to the question of people who are born with dual genitalia, or no genitalia? Who or what makes the decision as to what *** they are?
It’s a big part of your claim that the brain does not determine one's sexuality.

Yes, willing to concede. What makes them any more of an expert than me? They went to college and got degrees, so did I. I am sure we have learned many of the same things... so why am I different? Because I may have a different view or opinions? Are my thoughts not valid unless the fall in line with everyone else? No delusions here.

You are again veering off into psychological when I have made it clear I am speaking in the physical. The physical attributes that make a male a male and a female a female. I am not a psychologist and don't care to engage in the mental dysfunctions that allow these people to escape reality and call themselves something they are not. For whatever reasons they are making the choices to do so.

I don't know any actual "African Americans" are you referring to Black Americans? If so, I think "fundamentally" they are also **** sapiens so sure, fundamentally the are the same.

I did answer the question on dual genitalia... I guess you want me to answer it again? Ok, I said I was not speaking on genetic defects and that science already has names for their disorders. Good enough? But if need be you can label them male or female by the *** chromosomes they have. How about now... good enough?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

'At the crossroads of chemistry, electronics, mechanical engineering, polymer science, biology, tissue engineering, computer science, and materials science, electrical devices are currently being engineered that blend directly within organs and tissues. These sophisticated devices are mediators, recorders, and stimulators of electricity with the capacity to monitor important electrophysiological events, replace disabled body parts, or even stimulate tissues to overcome their current limitations. They are therefore capable of leading humanity forward into the age of cyborgs, a time in which human biology can be hacked at will to yield beings with abilities beyond their natural capabilities.'

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/advs.201700931

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

'For all cell types tested mRNA was transfected more readily than DNA, and its expression was highly uniform in cell populations. Even cell types relatively resistant to transfection with DNA could express transfected mRNA well. The level of mRNA expression could be controlled over a wide range by changing the amount of input RNA. Cells could be efficiently and simultaneously loaded with several different transcripts.'

Synthetic messenger RNA as a tool for gene therapy - PubMed

Transfection of human cells with DNA in biomedical applications carries the risk of insertional mutagenesis. Transfection with mRNA avoids this problem; however, in vitro production of mRNA, based on preliminary DNA template cloning in special vectors, is a laborious and time-consuming...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

‘For many years, it was generally accepted that mRNA is too unstable to be efficiently used for gene therapy purposes. In the last decade, however, several research groups faced this challenge and not only proved the feasibility of mRNA-mediated transfection with surprising results regarding transfection efficiency and duration of protein expression, but also were able to demonstrate major advantages over the use of pDNA…..Finally, it covers recent literature describing specific applications for mRNA based gene delivery, showing that until now most attention has been paid to vaccination strategies.’

mRNA as gene therapeutic: how to control protein expression - PubMed

For many years, it was generally accepted that mRNA is too unstable to be efficiently used for gene therapy purposes. In the last decade, however, several research groups faced this challenge and not only proved the feasibility of mRNA-mediated transfection with surprising results regarding...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

'Biological engineers design RNA circuits that enable precise control over the dose of therapeutic protein a patient receives...

To help make RNA-based gene therapy more effective, the MIT team set out to precisely control the production of therapeutic proteins once the RNA gets inside cells. To do that, they decided to adapt synthetic biology principles, which allow for precise programming of synthetic DNA circuits, to RNA.

The researchers’ new circuits consist of a single strand of RNA that includes genes for the desired therapeutic proteins as well as genes for RNA-binding proteins, which control the expression of the therapeutic proteins.

“Due to the dynamic nature of replication, the circuits’ performance can be tuned to allow different proteins to express at different times, all from the same strand of RNA,” Becraft says..."'

This RNA-based technique could make gene therapy more effective

MIT biological engineers have devised a way to regulate the expression of messenger RNA once it gets into cells, giving them more precise control over gene therapy treatments for cancer and other diseases.

news.mit.edu

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

‘Moderna MRNA announced that it has initiated a phase I/II study to evaluate its seasonal influenza vaccine candidates, mRNA-1020 and mRNA-1030. Both candidates have been designed to include mRNAs to target both hemagglutinin and neuraminidase, two major surface glycoproteins that help the influenza virus to infect.’

MSN