Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You’d have to provide proof to make anyone look anything.
A claim without proof isn’t enough to make anyone form an opinion or make a decision.

Hell, I provided court documentation to you and you of something and you refused to believe it. Yet you think your word is gospel “because you said so”.
Entitled child. Demand participation trophies much?
Was this the BS Massachusetts Supreme Court vaccine documents you tried to pass off as proving your point? Proof doesn’t mean very much when we all just look for the facts in order to destroy someone in an internet argument.
 
Was this the BS Massachusetts Supreme Court vaccine documents you tried to pass off as proving your point? Proof doesn’t mean very much when we all just look for the facts in order to destroy someone in an internet argument.
So, proof and facts mean nothing when backing up a claim? Interesting way to view things.

It was the court documents regarding **** accusations against Trump. Could also be the video of the insurrection that he claimed was not real b/c he was not there (a stance he has since reversed). Could also be a definition from the OED that he claims is wrong because he knows definitions better.
Or MANY other examples.

If you’re trying to defend him, you’re backing a fool.
 
So, proof and facts mean nothing when backing up a claim? Interesting way to view things.

It was the court documents regarding **** accusations against Trump. Could also be the video of the insurrection that he claimed was not real b/c he was not there (a stance he has since reversed). Could also be a definition from the OED that he claims is wrong because he knows definitions better.
Or MANY other examples.

If you’re trying to defend him, you’re backing a fool.
I'm not defending anyone. I just don't like you anymore than I like Trump. Your facts are gathered to prove an already preconceived world view. Facts in your hands is a weapon, not a quest for truth. You looking for facts is a total waste if time.
 
You’d have to provide proof to make anyone “look” anything.
A claim without proof isn’t enough to make anyone form an opinion or make a decision.

Hell, I provided court documentation to you and you of something and you refused to believe it. Yet you think your word is gospel “because you said so”.
Entitled child. Demand participation trophies much?
Wrong. Like usual, I will explain for you.

You, Rob, try to make claims about me all the time. You have no proof mind you, just your FEELINGS and OPINIONS. But YOU try to pass of your accusations as facts.

What I have just stated is based on actual statements you have made about me. These actions make YOU, Rob, a hypocrite. That is not something one should strive to be. Now go sit down and shut up. Dummy.
 
So, proof and facts mean nothing when backing up a claim? Interesting way to view things.

It was the court documents regarding **** accusations against Trump. Could also be the video of the insurrection that he claimed was not real b/c he was not there (a stance he has since reversed). Could also be a definition from the OED that he claims is wrong because he knows definitions better.
Or MANY other examples.

If you’re trying to defend him, you’re backing a fool.
I haven't reversed anything. I was not at the Capitol on Jan 6th. Neither were you. This means NEITHER one of us can say "I know it happened for fact". I said the left caused an insurrection to trigger you. Which it did. You are too dumb to know when people are fuucking with you because you are so geared up for trigger words so you can argue that all common sense has left your brain. Idiot.

For someone who wants proof and facts you sure seem to flop a lot. A woman says she was *****... Rob just accepts that as facts and proof. Why? Because the accused is Trump? What if you were the accused... would you like someone to get the facts and prove it wasn't you or would you just accept that you are going to jail for ****? Yeah, shut up dummy.

I did not say the definition was wrong, I said the grammar they used was wrong. You may have a mental, retention issue there pal. Have yourself submitted for test. Moron.
 
Apparently Rob has made a list of rules and has brought them to Caraudio.com deep into the Thunderdome and demands that we follow HIS rules and if anyone speaks they MUST provide proof or be shamed. Sounds EXACTLY like the current presidential administration.

Go eat a diick Rob.
Hmmm, pretty sure the rule of “if you claim it, YOU prove it” has been around since long before any of us were alive, and mist certainly before I joined this forum.
Heck, anti-libel LAW has been around since the 1700’s, and the scientific method since the 16th or even 15th century.
Providing what you claim is not a new concept
Except maybe for you.

Everthing I have said about you can be verified with quotes of your own posts. Unless you want to claim your account was taken over and posts were being made without your knowledge, then those posts are proof.

You, explaining how the OED is wrong and you are not:
37944
 
Last edited:
Hmmm, pretty sure the rule of “if you claim it, YOU prove it” has been around since long before any of us were alive, and mist certainly before I joined this forum.
Heck, anti-libel LAW has been around since the 1700’s, and the scientific method since the 16th or even 15th century.
Providing what you claim is not a new concept
Except maybe for you.
Good thing for all of us is this is a car audio web site so who cares what you demand everyone to do when they speak.
 
I haven't reversed anything. I was not at the Capitol on Jan 6th. Neither were you. This means NEITHER one of us can say "I know it happened for fact". I said the left caused an insurrection to trigger you. Which it did. You are too dumb to know when people are fuucking with you because you are so geared up for trigger words so you can argue that all common sense has left your brain. Idiot.

For someone who wants proof and facts you sure seem to flop a lot. A woman says she was *****... Rob just accepts that as facts and proof. Why? Because the accused is Trump? What if you were the accused... would you like someone to get the facts and prove it wasn't you or would you just accept that you are going to jail for ****? Yeah, shut up dummy.

I did not say the definition was wrong, I said the grammar they used was wrong. You may have a mental, retention issue there pal. Have yourself submitted for test. Moron.
You can't see nitrogen, so I guess it'll never be a fact that it exists and you breathe it 24/7. You can't see and never will electricity going through the wires in your car audio "build", so I guess there is no proof electricity even exists. You've never seen a **** happen, so I guess you will never believe one actually did happen. You've never seen a billion dollars in person, so I guess there is no proof that such money exists. You didn't see your laptop being assembled, so there is no proof it ever actually was.

Jeez, you are a fvcking weird kid.
 
You can't see nitrogen, so I guess it'll never be a fact that it exists and you breathe it 24/7. You can't see and never will electricity going through the wires in your car audio "build", so I guess there is no proof electricity even exists. You've never seen a **** happen, so I guess you will never believe one actually did happen. You've never seen a billion dollars in person, so I guess there is no proof that such money exists. You didn't see your laptop being assembled, so there is no proof it ever actually was.

Jeez, you are a fvcking weird kid.
Ahhh the old foolosopher.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,094,759
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top