Winners only.

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Looks like Rob the diick eater still has free time. Okay....

99.4% of a person. You can't.

2.3 Kids. You can't. It's a made up statistic.

48% lefties is possible if the total number of person in the group is an even number.

Backpedaling. I do know what it is... it's that thing you are about to do.

Dog fuucker.

A “made up statistic”? You mean you can’t average 2.3 kids per family if there are 230 kids across 100 families?
Very similar to “average gas prices are only used to tell if prices are going up or down”.

Wow. Math has been wrong all these years? Good thing you arrived to correct it!
Can’t wait for the backpedal on THIS one.
Maybe it’ll be “I just said that to test you”.
It certainly couldn’t be “You just don’t understand metaphor” or “Learn to know when I’m being facetious”.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I have been looking and looking and looking. I cannot find one family in all the world with 2.3 kids. They either have 2 kids (whole humans) or 3 kids (whole humans). Even a kid with half a body is still a whole human... 1 person.

No backpedaling needed. If you are counting a person as part of a person then you are doing it to serve some need. Why would someone need to count only part of someone or some thing if it isn't to manipulate an outcome?

It IS a made up statistic. Go blow a large chili fart out of your asss while blowing that puppy.

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

I have been looking and looking and looking. I cannot find one family in all the world with 2.3 kids. They either have 2 kids (whole humans) or 3 kids (whole humans). Even a kid with half a body is still a whole human... 1 person.

No backpedaling needed. If you are counting a person as part of a person then you are doing it to serve some need. Why would someone need to count only part of someone or some thing if it isn't to manipulate an outcome?

It IS a made up statistic. Go blow a large chili fart out of your asss while blowing that puppy.

Shiver brain rob probably counts as .3 kid if it's based on brain function.

 

[SlugButter]

Rob is still writing his retard political thesis on a car audio forum? That’s cute….

 

[SlugButter]

We need world war 3 immediately. Time for the weak to perish…….Rob.

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

We need world war 3 immediately. Time for the weak to perish…….Rob.

I don't know how serious you are. The thought of WW3 is rather terrifying, as it would almost certainly be a nuclear war. I'm fine with a man-to-man armed conflict, but random nuclear strikes leaves everyone vulnerable.

 

[SlugButter]

I don't know how serious you are. The thought of WW3 is rather terrifying, as it would almost certainly be a nuclear war. I'm fine with a man-to-man armed conflict, but random nuclear strikes leaves everyone vulnerable.

I half am kidding, but I’m also half serious. We are about to watch 30 million Ukrainian citizens starve to death while getting shelled and slaughtered on live TV. Seems like a better war than Afghanistan was to me. We are cowards if we don’t stop Russia from doing this. We stop them and take the chance they start nuclear war. That’s my position.

 

[SlugButter]

Our dumbass politicians made millions of dollars over the years in Ukraine, now we will just sit by and watch Russia kill their children. What a waste of a good military we have if we can’t use it to do what’s right.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

The fact the Metalhead and Sluggo actually agree that you can’t get an average of 2.3 kids if there are 230 kids across 100 families speaks VOLUMES about their intelligence.

Let’s try a simple test, guys: If there are two families living in a duplex and one has 2 kids and the other has 3, guess what the average number of kids per family is?
2.5! Yes, it’s 2.5 kids average per family!

How is this possible, you ask? It’s called MATHEMATICS!
3 kids + 2 kids = 5 kids
5 kids / 2 families = 2.5 kids per family.
Mindblowing, huh?

Here’s the average number of kids per family in the US for some past years.
If you look closely, you’ll see they are NOT while numbers.
Amazing.
Morons.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Our ******* politicians made millions of dollars over the years in Ukraine, now we will just sit by and watch Russia kill their children. What a waste of a good military we have if we can’t use it to do what’s right.

Is this your retard political thesis, genius?’
They’re already activating Air National Guard members.
That doesn’t sound like we’re sitting by and doing nothing, does it?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

We need world war 3 immediately. Time for the weak to perish…….Rob.

Don’t blame me. Maybe if you had put some effort into life, you’d make it through.
But we’ll ultimately be stronger without you anyway.
Darwinism.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The fact the Metalhead and Sluggo actually agree that you can’t get an average of 2.3 kids if there are 230 kids across 100 families speaks VOLUMES about their intelligence.

Let’s try a simple test, guys: If there are two families living in a duplex and one has 2 kids and the other has 3, guess what the average number of kids per family is?
2.5! Yes, it’s 2.5 kids average per family!

How is this possible, you ask? It’s called MATHEMATICS!
3 kids + 2 kids = 5 kids
5 kids / 2 families = 2.5 kids per family.
Mindblowing, huh?

Here’s the average number of kids per family in the US for some past years.
If you look closely, you’ll see they are NOT while numbers.
Amazing.
Morons.
View attachment 36218

Nobody said you can't do it. What is being said is that it is technically inaccurate. Like you stated, one family HAS 2 kids the other HAS 3. Just because your math shows an average doesn't now make it true that the first family gained half a child while the second lost half a child. Your average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means.

Put some of this on the diick you're licking and make your nose run.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Nobody said you can't do it. What is being said is that it is technically inaccurate. Like you stated, one family HAS 2 kids the other HAS 3. Just because your math shows an average doesn't now make it true that the first family gained half a child while the second lost half a child. Your average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means.

Put some of this on the diick you're licking and make your nose run.

Actually, YOU said you can't do it. Post #6855: "2.3 Kids. You can't. It's a made up statistic." You spew so much bullshlt, you can;t even remember your own posts. Idiot.

“Technically inaccurate” for “nefarious means”?
Ya gotta’ fuggin’ be kidding me. Have you actually never learned about mathematical averaging?
That post alone suggests your IQ is in the range known as “dull”.

Describing averages as “technically inaccurate”. Holy fvcking shlt, you are an example of an education fail.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

“Technically inaccurate” for “nefarious means”?
Ya gotta’ fuggin’ be kidding me. Have you actually never learned about mathematical averaging?
That post alone suggests your IQ is in the range known as “dull”.

Describing averages as “technically inaccurate”. Holy fvcking shlt, you are an example of an education fail.

Idiot... remember the comprehension conversations... what am I saying, of course you don't. You are an idiot. All that went right over your diick licking head. Everybody knows what averages are moron. Nobody is disputing what an average is. You are not supposed to put the q-tip inside the ear. Cherry picking knob gobbler.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The sad thing is you actually believe the shit you are saying. "Dull IQ", really? So are you going to now say that your mathematical average really does make half a child appear and disappear? Prove to me how, I'll wait. I do like magic.