Winners only.

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

are you autistic?

He lost his soul. He has no creativity, no point, no d*ck.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

are you autistic?

Nope. Not on the spectrum.
Type A with tons of energy and ability to multitask like a machine though.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

He lost his soul. He has no creativity, no point, no d*ck.

Ahhh, the conservative arguing with history and facts, eh?
How's that working out for you?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Careful... he can't comprehend metaphors or satire. His go to when he is stumped is that you will somehow be backpedaling.

You claimed you were speaking with metaphor and whimsy.
You've never done either.
Like that time you claimed 99.4% of a million was not possible.
Good stuff.

"You literally have no clue how to comprehend when people speak metaphorically.
You literally have no clue that your views are not the only prudent views.
You literally think you know better than everyone else.
You literally have no clue how different people speak or how to take their meanings.
You literally have no clue how to know when someone is being facetious."

"Prudent", huh?
Share some of your "prudent" thoughts with us.
Do you speak prudently with metaphor and whimsy?
"How to take their meanings"? YOU are the one constantly whining that people don't interpret your drivel correctly. Speak literally, and no one has to interpret your shlt.

 

[Kayge 10+ year member]

Ahhh, the conservative arguing with history and facts, eh?
How's that working out for you?

why do you even assume that everyone who disagrees with you is a conservative?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

why do you even assume that everyone who disagrees with you is a conservative?

Logical progression. Everyone who argues against me declares I am a Liberal Democrat. If they are arguing against me with that claim, then they must be Conservative Republicans.

Or is that another one-way street like "Trump won. Get over it" which has now turned into "Trump lost but I won't get over it!".

 

[Kayge 10+ year member]

Logical progression. Everyone who argues against me declares I am a Liberal Democrat. If they are arguing against me with that claim, then they must be Conservative Republicans.

Or is that another one-way street like "Trump won. Get over it" which has now turned into "Trump lost but I won't get over it!".

i never once defended trump or said i liked him

you want to be sniffed by Biden

your a libtard even if you dont want to be one

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

i never once defended trump or said i liked him

you want to be sniffed by Biden

your a libtard even if you dont want to be one

Funny, that you ask about why I think people are conservative, when in multiple direct responses to my posts, you insinuate I'm a liberal. A complete assumption on your part.

So, you can assume I'm a liberal, but it is unfair of me to assume you are a conservative who can't spell?

"you want to be sniffed by Biden
your a libtard even if you dont want to be one"
Is this where you "argue with history and facts"?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You claimed you were speaking with metaphor and whimsy.
You've never done either.
Like that time you claimed 99.4% of a million was not possible.
Good stuff.

"You literally have no clue how to comprehend when people speak metaphorically.
You literally have no clue that your views are not the only prudent views.
You literally think you know better than everyone else.
You literally have no clue how different people speak or how to take their meanings.
You literally have no clue how to know when someone is being facetious."

"Prudent", huh?
Share some of your "prudent" thoughts with us.
Do you speak prudently with metaphor and whimsy?
"How to take their meanings"? YOU are the one constantly whining that people don't interpret your drivel correctly. Speak literally, and no one has to interpret your shlt.

Hey, dog fuucker... you lost. Just stfu. I did no such claim that I was "speaking with metaphor and whimsy" YOU DID. I said... mind you, you have quoted EXACTLY what I said. I said that YOU LITERALLY... see quote. These things are prudent diick eater and are very important in comprehending conversations. For the last damn time. . . ... . . . . 99.4% of 1 million IS POSSIBLE... .. . . . Now listen one last time glass licker. I said you cannot vaccinate PART OF A PERSON... a SINGLE PERSON. I know this because it is IMPOSSIBLE TO VACCINATE PART OF ONE PERSON. IS THAT CLEAR!!!!! GET OFF MY DIICK, IT IS NOT FOR YOU!!!

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So how much time does the current administration need to fix the gas prices? Since Republicans didn't screw it up it should be pretty quick right. Just here in my area gas has jumped $.50 a gallon for 87 in 4 days.

Gas cost more...
Businesses charge more for products to compensate for fuel cost...
Everybody pays more for everything...

#winning?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I am waiting for this rise in COL pay that diickless talks about to mirror the rising price of everything.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Hey, dog fuucker... you lost. Just stfu. I did no such claim that I was "speaking with metaphor and whimsy" YOU DID. I said... mind you, you have quoted EXACTLY what I said. I said that YOU LITERALLY... see quote. These things are prudent diick eater and are very important in comprehending conversations. For the last damn time. . . ... . . . . 99.4% of 1 million IS POSSIBLE... .. . . . Now listen one last time glass licker. I said you cannot vaccinate PART OF A PERSON... a SINGLE PERSON. I know this because it is IMPOSSIBLE TO VACCINATE PART OF ONE PERSON. IS THAT CLEAR!!!!! GET OFF MY DIICK, IT IS NOT FOR YOU!!!

I quoted your post, dumbass.
Lemme guess: you don’t classify yourself as a member of “people” when you post a list of things people do?
It’s about all people but you?

As for vaccines, the news report spoke about “more than 99% of people”. NO ONE ever said more than 99% of a PERSON.
YOU saw “more than 99%” and immediately thought you were smart and were going to prove the media wrong. “How can it be more than 99% but less than 100%? You can’t vaccinate PART of a person”.

Only a total fvcking dunce with no common sense could ever read “more than 99% of people” and think they mean only a PORTION of each individual person in a huge group is vaccinated.

Only a total fvcking dunce would think we are “energy independent” when we can’t produce our daily consumption of oil by a shortfall of 8MILLION barrels per day.

Only a total fvcking dunce would think he knows definitions better than the Oxford English Dictionary but Nader the guise that “people are fallible”.

Only a total fvcking dunce would think you can’t calculate 40% of 90, because “you need ten more to make it a hundred”.

Don’t pay yourself on the back when you think you’ve proved yourself right, but have only given more evidence that you are wrong.

This list could be a lot longer.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I quoted your post, *******.
Lemme guess: you don’t classify yourself as a member of “people” when you post a list of things people do?
It’s about all people but you?

As for vaccines, the news report spoke about “more than 99% of people”. NO ONE ever said more than 99% of a PERSON.
YOU saw “more than 99%” and immediately thought you were smart and were going to prove the media wrong. “How can it be more than 99% but less than 100%? You can’t vaccinate PART of a person”.

Only a total fvcking dunce with no common sense could ever read “more than 99% of people” and think they mean only a PORTION of each individual person in a huge group is vaccinated.

Only a total fvcking dunce would think we are “energy independent” when we can’t produce our daily consumption of oil by a shortfall of 8MILLION barrels per day.

Only a total fvcking dunce would think he knows definitions better than the Oxford English Dictionary but Nader the guise that “people are fallible”.

Only a total fvcking dunce would think you can’t calculate 40% of 90, because “you need ten more to make it a hundred”.

Don’t pay yourself on the back when you think you’ve proved yourself right, but have only given more evidence that you are wrong.

This list could be a lot longer.

Look at the diickless dog fuucker backpedal. LOL Eat a DIICK Rob lol

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Look at the diickless dog fuucker backpedal. LOL Eat a DIICK Rob lol

I haven't lost anything... neither you are him has answered my question. How do you vaccinate part of a person? As in there is 1 person he is 99.4% vaccinated. Justify that.

Uhhh, how do you vaccinate 99.4% of a person?

Uhhh, how does a family have 2.3 kids? Do they cut off an arm and a leg from one?

Uhhh, how can 48% of people be left handed? Does that mean they are missing fingers?

Do you even KNOW what backpedaling is? You fvcking got THAT accusation wrong too!

Fvcking idiot.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Looks like Rob the diick eater still has free time. Okay....

99.4% of a person. You can't.

2.3 Kids. You can't. It's a made up statistic.

48% lefties is possible if the total number of person in the group is an even number.

Backpedaling. I do know what it is... it's that thing you are about to do.

Dog fuucker.