Winners only.

[hispls 5,000+ posts]

has been proven to be SO incorrect that it almost immediately gets flagged or deleted on social media.

If the premise of your silly doomsday cult is so thin that it requires censorship that may be because it doesn't hold up well to scrutiny.

Augustine of Hippo is reported to have said that "The truth is like a lion, it doesn't need defending, let it out and it can defend itself".
I would challenge you to name 5 other things that are so obviously not true that they must be completely censored.

This "science juice" fits the definition of vaccine that has existed LONG before "this summer".

I guess I must have a defective memory or didn't get the latest newspeak dictionary because up until this year "vaccine" used to be defined as something containing a dead or weakened form of the disease. That is absolutely NOT what people are injecting themselves with right now.

science is REACTIONARY because it HAS to be

Again, my newspeak dictionary is way out of date, because that's not how the scientific method worked back when I was in school. What this looks like to me is a doomsday cult where the priests demand sacrifices and performing the correct rituals to avoid some catastrophe which will happen at some ever-changing but near date if the edicts of the priest caste are not obeyed.

These are interesting graphs and I'd like to learn more about them.

So type www.google.com into a web browser and search for "Polio rates by year", "polio deaths", or "polio paralysis" or whichever disease, click the "images" tab and take your pick of sources. Then you can open another web browser and type "what year was ____ vaccine invented" and see where that date fits in on the graphs.
Again, there is strong evidence that the dead/weakened organism, oldspeak definition of "vaccine", is effective in preventing infections and there is enough data to quantify the risks associated and make informed decisions, but it is interesting that most of these real serious pandemics throughout history either sorted themselves out without human intervention or were on a down and out trend before human intervention.

You also failed to make a prediction on when all of this will be over. Are you OK with having to go out and get COVID boosters every 4-6 months for the rest of your life if that's what """science""" tells you to do?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Trump literally said fight with your words and fight peacefully. The people arguing these facts are doing it just to argue. Some because they have no common sense. Some because they don't comprehend the spoken words. Some because they are biased. Many because they are just that blind.

Arguing back and forth about what was said be it by those of us who comprehend and understood what he said or by those who are biased against him will not turn back time or make anyone look more right or more wrong than the other person.

One thing for sure is people need to hold the same standards for the people they support as they do against the people they talk smack about. All this hypocrisy is getting old as phuck because both side are dry dogging us with no lube but you all would rather bicker about who's lube is better rather than stop getting plowed.

Hint: There is no lube.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

If the premise of your silly doomsday cult is so thin that it requires censorship that may be because it doesn't hold up well to scrutiny.
Augustine of Hippo is reported to have said that "The truth is like a lion, it doesn't need defending, let it out and it can defend itself".
I would challenge you to name 5 other things that are so obviously not true that they must be completely censored.

It HAS been scrutinized and is being censored because it is false and dangerous info to spread. Kind of like yelling "b0mb" during a concert, and causing a stampede. When people overdose b/c a POTUS lies about a "miracle drug" they took "successfully", it's obvious (and PROVED) that false info on social media can cause major problems.



I guess I must have a defective memory or didn't get the latest newspeak dictionary because up until this year "vaccine" used to be defined as something containing a dead or weakened form of the disease. That is absolutely NOT what people are injecting themselves with right now.

The medical field also used to think the vaccine was what killed the virus. Scientists also used to think the sun revolved around the Earth. Are you suggesting that a definition should not be changed as new knowledge is gained? I suppose in your mind a solar eclipse is the gods being angry, because that is what the definition USED to be?

Again, my newspeak dictionary is way out of date, because that's not how the scientific method worked back when I was in school. What this looks like to me is a doomsday cult where the priests demand sacrifices and performing the correct rituals to avoid some catastrophe which will happen at some ever-changing but near date if the edicts of the priest caste are not obeyed.

1) make an observation that describes a problem, 2) create a hypothesis, 3) test the hypothesis, and 4) draw conclusions and refine the hypothesis
This is the scientific method. Which part is not being followed with regard to this virus and the vaccine? What is YOUR scientific method to determine the vaccine is bogus? I'll assume you did 1 & 2. Whatprocedure did you use to TEST your hypothesis? Human studies? Lab rats? Computer simulation? Or was it that you read a meme from a website that uses "alternate information" (their words) and came to a conclusion?


So type www.google.com into a web browser and search for "Polio rates by year", "polio deaths", or "polio paralysis" or whichever disease, click the "images" tab and take your pick of sources. Then you can open another web browser and type "what year was ____ vaccine invented" and see where that date fits in on the graphs.
Again, there is strong evidence that the dead/weakened organism, oldspeak definition of "vaccine", is effective in preventing infections and there is enough data to quantify the risks associated and make informed decisions, but it is interesting that most of these real serious pandemics throughout history either sorted themselves out without human intervention or were on a down and out trend before human intervention.

What is interesting is that the vast majority of people who get polio and the other diseases are unvaccinated. That's a really weird coincidence. The thing is, science doesn't go for coincidence. Science looks at correlation and causation. For example, if you flip a coin 300x and it comes up tails 250x, science tells us there is something wrong. It's no coincidence; something has affected the test. Then science figures out what it is.
The fact that the very vast majority of people who get an illness are unvaccinated is not a coincidence. it has a cause. Science has determined that the lack of vaccine is the common factor and the cause. That has NOTHING to do with historical polio deaths. It has to do with the here and now.
Kind of like automotive deaths. They dropped over the years, and then we got seatbelts and they dropped more. With your meme's logic, seatbelts don't help reduce deaths becasue death rates were dropping anyway.
Your meme is trying to tie two dissimilar metrics together to reach a conclusion. Due diligence shows that. But most people don't practice due diligence. You should try it.

You also failed to make a prediction on when all of this will be over. Are you OK with having to go out and get COVID boosters every 4-6 months for the rest of your life if that's what """science""" tells you to do?

When this all started and Trump said it would be over in a month or two, many doctors were saying "18 months or more". Who was right? I'll take a medical professional's advice and knowledge over a POTUS's, or someone on a social media platform.
If I have to get a booster to prevent what could be a life-threatening illness (like our soldiers do regularly so they don't get sick and don't bring disease back here), I would do it. If I was traveling somewhere where Polio was active and I might get exposed, I'd get a booster. If I had to take anti-rejection meds for life, I'd do it.
Are you all-in? Are you anti-all-medicine, or just the ones that have been tied to politics? If you got cancer, would you refuse the MRNA treatment, or accept it since there is no politics directly tied to it?
How strong are your convictions?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Trump literally said fight with your words and fight peacefully. The people arguing these facts are doing it just to argue. Some because they have no common sense. Some because they don't comprehend the spoken words. Some because they are biased. Many because they are just that blind.

Arguing back and forth about what was said be it by those of us who comprehend and understood what he said or by those who are biased against him will not turn back time or make anyone look more right or more wrong than the other person.

One thing for sure is people need to hold the same standards for the people they support as they do against the people they talk smack about. All this hypocrisy is getting old as phuck because both side are dry dogging us with no lube but you all would rather bicker about who's lube is better rather than stop getting plowed.

Hint: There is no lube.

Trump literally said he was going to the Capitol. If he was literal about peace, why lie about a short journey?
You and others are trying to play both sides of the coin. Commit, or don't. Stop vacillating.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Trump literally said he was going to the Capitol. If he was literal about peace, why lie about a short journey?
You and others are trying to play both sides of the coin. Commit, or don't. Stop vacillating.

Just because he said he was going somewhere doesn't mean Secret Service is going to let him. Use your brai....

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Just because he said he was going somewhere doesn't mean Secret Service is going to let him. Use your brai....

Hmmm, why would the SS be afraid to let him go to the Capitol for "wearing hats and flag waving"?
Why would they consider that a potentially dangerous situation and a place he should not be, when he had just finished a public rally?
Did they perhaps know that security had been inexplicably reduced?
Did he have other plans but his incredible brain forgot and he just rambled nonsense about going? If that was just rambled nonsense, what ELSE was rambled nonsense?

Commit, or don't. You can't have it both ways.

“These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!”

His choice of words. "These are the things that happen..." So he KNEW that this was going to happen.
Interesting.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Hmmm, why would the SS be afraid to let him go to the Capitol for "wearing hats and flag waving"?
Why would they consider that a potentially dangerous situation and a place he should not be, when he had just finished a public rally?
Did they perhaps know that security had been inexplicably reduced?

Seriously? Rob... let go of the constant need you have to argue and just think. If the President says aloud in a public forum where he is going to be then anyone looking to do him harm would know where to find him. The Secret Service knows this. Their job is to protect the POTUS.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

How much poo is in Joe Biden's tighty whities right now?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Seriously? Rob... let go of the constant need you have to argue and just think. If the President says aloud in a public forum where he is going to be then anyone looking to do him harm would know where to find him. The Secret Service knows this. Their job is to protect the POTUS.

Great logic. So...no one knew where the rally would be that day. No schedule. No advance notice.
His followers all just happened to show up by coincidence?

Yet, there is concern that if he says "We are leaving here and going to the Capitol," someone will formulate and execute a short-notice plan to do him harm.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Great logic. So...no one knew where the rally would be that day. No schedule. No advance notice.
His followers all just happened to show up by coincidence?

Yet, there is concern that if he says "We are leaving here and going to the Capitol," someone will formulate and execute a short-notice plan to do him harm.

Stop being argumentative for phucks sake. When the Secret Service knows ahead of time where the POTUS will be they can plan their security. I swear you are doing this just to phuck with people. Go ******** research why the Secret Services doesn't just let the POTUS go wherever they want. You don't believe anyone when they talk so go phuck off and get your information elsewhere.

 

[Jonnyswboy]

Anecdotes aren't science, but yes, show me some actual science which uses the scientific method to back of any of these claims. Also you are aware that whatever this science juice is isn't a "vaccine" by any definition prior to this summer, right? Why did we have to change the definition of "vaccine"? Science?


CDC is already talking about 4th dose "booster". I suppose this is all part of science though and if you only had 2 you're not even """fully vaccinated""" anymore. https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/17/world/coronavirus-newsletter-intl-17-11-21/index.html
My theory is that this shit will continue indefinitely where every 4-6 months we will have a new wave or variant and big pharma will need to sell everybody boosters. Why don't you tell us when "science" thinks this will end and we can compare notes at some future date?


Took oxycodone for 3 days after surgery this year. Not sure what the **** that has to do with injecting myself with some experimental RNA cocktail and apart from that and 3 days worth of narcotics for a serious injury 4 years ago I've managed to go my entire adult life without taking any drugs whatsoever and am extremely cautious about what I put into my body.


So once you've had the polio vaccine and boosters can you still get polio? Can you still spread polio? Is the polio vaccine a dead or weakened form of the virus or some MRNA spike proteins? Evidence is rather thin that vaccinations even had a lot to do with endemic diseases coming and going in the past, but I'd say there's at least a strong body of evidence that they can be effective. Though again, please link to any randomized control studies that prove any of this stuff you claim and do please provide your prediction on where and when this all ends.

View attachment 33751

This picture is retarded. Why is accurate information always in low resolution images with all caps? Look at literally any other source retard.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Stop being argumentative for phucks sake. When the Secret Service knows ahead of time where the POTUS will be they can plan their security. I swear you are doing this just to phuck with people. Go ******** research why the Secret Services doesn't just let the POTUS go wherever they want. You don't believe anyone when they talk so go phuck off and get your information elsewhere.

I don't believe people who just spew shlt without having any knowledge as to what they are saying.
You posted that they wouldn't let him go b/c he SAID he was going to go, and "anyone looking to do him harm would know where to find him". You can't reconcile that claim with the fact that every one of his rallys is announced well in advance.

Why would the SS think there would be a problem with him, caused by his own followers (the people who would know where he was going), unless there was a problem expected at the Capitol in the first place? Like, maybe some kind of violence to "fight like hell" and "stop the steal"?
Your argument that he was being protected leads to the logical conclusion that they knew sh't was going to go down.

As for "stop being argumentative": You're kind of missing the point of debate, discussion, and argument. If you think that you get to say "Accept what I say and do not argue what you perceive as BS", you are sadly mistaken.
I am not a student listening to a teacher; I am not a child listening to a parent.

You want to avoid argument? Post stuff that you can back with more than feelings.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I don't believe people who just spew shlt without having any knowledge as to what they are saying.
You posted that they wouldn't let him go b/c he SAID he was going to go, and "anyone looking to do him harm would know where to find him". You can't reconcile that claim with the fact that every one of his rallys is announced well in advance.

Why would the SS think there would be a problem with him, caused by his own followers (the people who would know where he was going), unless there was a problem expected at the Capitol in the first place? Like, maybe some kind of violence to "fight like hell" and "stop the steal"?
Your argument that he was being protected leads to the logical conclusion that they knew sh't was going to go down.

You are so damn clueless it's embarrassing.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I don't believe people who just spew shlt without having any knowledge as to what they are saying.
You posted that they wouldn't let him go b/c he SAID he was going to go, and "anyone looking to do him harm would know where to find him". You can't reconcile that claim with the fact that every one of his rallys is announced well in advance.

Why would the SS think there would be a problem with him, caused by his own followers (the people who would know where he was going), unless there was a problem expected at the Capitol in the first place? Like, maybe some kind of violence to "fight like hell" and "stop the steal"?
Your argument that he was being protected leads to the logical conclusion that they knew sh't was going to go down.

The President is NOT ALLOWED TO JUST GO WHEREVER HE WANTS JUST BECAUSE HE SAYS HE IS GOING. The SS is charged with his protection period. Unless they have plans in place prior to him going somewhere, HE IS NOT GOING FOR HIS OWN PROTECTION. Going to the Capitol was not on his list of approved places to go and therefore the people who's job it is to protect him WILL NOT ALLOW HIM TO GO. It has NOTHING to do with your narrative on the "insurrection" no matter how much you want to talk about Jan. 6th. Stop being retarded.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

The President is NOT ALLOWED TO JUST GO WHEREVER HE WANTS JUST BECAUSE HE SAYS HE IS GOING. The SS is charged with his protection period. Unless they have plans in place prior to him going somewhere, HE IS NOT GOING FOR HIS OWN PROTECTION. Going to the Capitol was not on his list of approved places to go and therefore the people who's job it is to protect him WILL NOT ALLOW HIM TO GO. It has NOTHING to do with your narrative on the "insurrection" no matter how much you want to talk about Jan. 6th. Stop being retarded.

In which case, he knowingly lied in his rally speech.

How do you know his list of approved places if the SS doesn't want anyone to know here he will be?

Corner. Painted yourself in. Again.