F*ck Facebook and the Cuckerberg

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I see your points here however, facts and evidence can be altered. Case in point: Jan. 6th video of Trumps Rally vs Unedited video of the Rally. Democrats have used CNN's video as "evidence" that Trump incited an insurrection on the Capitol Building when competent minds viewing the unedited video know what his message was and understood what he said.

There is a difference between "quoting" and "editing" as you infer it.
If they took his speech, chopped it and rearranged it to say something entirely different, then you'd have a point. if they took partial phrases or sentences out of context, then that it a problem too. Quoting the repetition of key words or phrases when they are used repetitively in a speech, especially when those words speak to the larger context and potential intent? NOT "altering of evidence".

Watch the entire video of his rally speech (and others). Watch what happened at the Capitol immediately after he gave the "stop the steal" speech at the rally. Watch the video of the actual events that then occurred when the "tourists" were just wanting to "wear hats and wave flags" but somehow ended up climbing the walls, assaulting police, getting killed trying to break into the chamber.

It is disingenuous if not completely ignorant of anyone to claim that the rally/s and the coup attempt are not directly related to each other, ESPECIALLY the same people who scream about the recent "race riots" being "caused by Democrat leaders".

A "stop the (vote) steal" rally immediately followed by an attempt to prevent an Electoral college vote from being completed?
Hmmmmm.

 

[Jesus Christ]

STFU! you minimize everything! and then twist and switch it around so it fits your agenda, your good with words not facts

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

There is a difference between "quoting" and "editing" as you infer it.
If they took his speech, chopped it and rearranged it to say something entirely different, then you'd have a point. if they took partial phrases or sentences out of context, then that it a problem too. Quoting the repetition of key words or phrases when they are used repetitively in a speech, especially when those words speak to the larger context and potential intent? NOT "altering of evidence".

Watch the entire video of his rally speech (and others). Watch what happened at the Capitol immediately after he gave the "stop the steal" speech at the rally. Watch the video of the actual events that then occurred when the "tourists" were just wanting to "wear hats and wave flags" but somehow ended up climbing the walls, assaulting police, getting killed trying to break into the chamber.

It is disingenuous if not completely ignorant of anyone to claim that the rally/s and the coup attempt are not directly related to each other, ESPECIALLY the same people who scream about the recent "race riots" being "caused by Democrat leaders".

A "stop the (vote) steal" rally immediately followed by an attempt to prevent an Electoral college vote from being completed?
Hmmmmm.

This exactly what CNN and other left leaning news sources did. I watched the unedited rally in its entirety and watched the chopped up versions narrated by biased reporters.

When Trump spoke he was "encouraging his people to be violent" but when your party speaks it's "The summer of love" as building burn, monuments fall, people are *****, people are murdered, businesses are destroyed and looted and peoples lives are ruined all in the name of smearing the acting president. I am not sorry to say but if there was an insurrection against this country it was encouraged over and over by the party you mindlessly support.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

This exactly what CNN and other left leaning news sources did. I watched the unedited rally in its entirety and watched the chopped up versions narrated by biased reporters.

When Trump spoke he was "encouraging his people to be violent" but when your party speaks it's "The summer of love" as building burn, monuments fall, people are *****, people are murdered, businesses are destroyed and looted and peoples lives are ruined all in the name of smearing the acting president. I am not sorry to say but if there was an insurrection against this country it was encouraged over and over by the party you mindlessly support.

Comparing the attempted coup to keep Trump in office to riots resulting from the murder of a black man by law enforcement is honestly a fool's folly.

It's as apples to oranges as you can get.
Speak to the situations in the context of what they are. it makes a lot more sense.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Comparing the attempted coup to keep Trump in office to riots resulting from the murder of a black man by law enforcement is honestly a fool's folly.

It's as apples to oranges as you can get.
Speak to the situations in the context of what they are. it makes a lot more sense.

So is continuing to think the riots had anything to do with a known drug addicted felon. These riots were literally opportunities for the criminal elements to do what they do best, break laws. There is a reason why stereotypes happen.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Facebook can go f*ck itself. They have no liability for following their own rules; they falsely claim "to keep people safe" while simultaneously deleting people's accounts for no explanation, whatsoever.

Everybody that works at Facebook can burn in hell. F*ck you techno-tyrants.

That is all.

I'll throw @Buck a bone.

 

[SlugButter]

I'll throw @Buck a bone.

View attachment 32618

It’s like getting kicked out of church. Having to read 2 opinions is way too much for people like Rob to deal with.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

It’s like getting kicked out of church. Having to read 2 opinions is way too much for people like Rob to deal with.

I try to read all opinions, genuinely. That's how I got to be this way; no thought or info was off limits. I put everything in a pot on boil, and all the BS burned off, and that's how I'm Buck.

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

Comparing the attempted coup to keep Trump in office to riots resulting from the murder of a black man by law enforcement is honestly a fool's folly.

It's as apples to oranges as you can get.
Speak to the situations in the context of what they are. it makes a lot more sense.

You're just wrong, and you're definitely a pot-stirrer.

By definition, it wasn't a coup. Trump was still in office. Those who stormed the capitol shouldn't have done it, but there was and are reasons to question the 2020 election's integrity, so their actions weren't unfounded.

George Floyd was a piece of shit. I believe "murder" means one person killing another. Floyd's death would be considered a *******, as nobody forced him to ingest a lethal amount of drugs, and his death was self-induced. I have nothing against addicts, as addiction itself is a victimless crime, but people who choose to indulge in drugs accept the risk when they put chemicals in their body. Home invasion, on the other hand, is a horrible crime that nobody with any decency would commit. The intent is to directly terrify other people and directly take away from others' earned wealth. The riots were completely unfounded; I've never lost someone and felt the need to steal things to help me get past it. How does that make any sense? "Someone I don't know died... better burn buildings and steal things I can't afford!"

You're right, it is apples and oranges, just not the way you think it is.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So is continuing to think the riots had anything to do with a known drug addicted felon. These riots were literally opportunities for the criminal elements to do what they do best, break laws. There is a reason why stereotypes happen.

Then the insurrection must have been the same? Simply a bunch of Republican criminals trying to overthrow our government?
They waited all these years for Trump to be their scapegoat excuse…

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Then the insurrection must have been the same? Simply a bunch of Republican criminals trying to overthrow our government?
They waited all these years for Trump to be their scapegoat excuse…

Why is it just Republicans are criminals?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You're just wrong, and you're definitely a pot-stirrer.

By definition, it wasn't a coup. Trump was still in office. Those who stormed the capitol shouldn't have done it, but there was and are reasons to question the 2020 election's integrity, so their actions weren't unfounded.

George Floyd was a piece of shit. I believe "murder" means one person killing another. Floyd's death would be considered a *******, as nobody forced him to ingest a lethal amount of drugs, and his death was self-induced. I have nothing against addicts, as addiction itself is a victimless crime, but people who choose to indulge in drugs accept the risk when they put chemicals in their body. Home invasion, on the other hand, is a horrible crime that nobody with any decency would commit. The intent is to directly terrify other people and directly take away from others' earned wealth. The riots were completely unfounded; I've never lost someone and felt the need to steal things to help me get past it. How does that make any sense? "Someone I don't know died... better burn buildings and steal things I can't afford!"

You're right, it is apples and oranges, just not the way you think it is.

It was an attempted coup.And the actions of the traitors who did it were ENTIRELY unfounded, borne of mob mentality created by lies. Lies spoken by a facking sitting president.

For the love of Christ, would someone PLEASE share all this goddamn evidence that the election was rigged/tampered/stolen? I can’t count how many times I’ve heard or read this bullshlt, yet no one, EVEN THE EX-PRESIDENT, can provide proof.
For **** sake, Fox even stopped making the claims to avoid lawsuits because THERE IS NO PROOF.
Like I said to Buck, if YOU have the proof you should be sharing it with a federal judge. Maybe the one who demanded the proof from Trump. That he cannot provide.

If you are really that confused about what happened with Floyd and are blaming him for his own death, you are simply a ******* idiot who is too dumb to be a member of society.

Why is it just Republicans are criminals?

You think Democrats were trying to attempt an insurrection in order to prevent the electoral college vote from confirming Biden won the election?
That would be pretty counterproductive.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

It was an attempted coup.

For the love of Christ, would someone PLEASE share all this goddamn evidence that the election was rigged/tampered/sti

You think Democrats were trying to attempt an insurrection in order to prevent the electoral college vote from confirming Biden won the election?
That would be pretty counterproductive.

I am off to bed but I will leave you with these thoughts...

Riddle me this. If the "Trump supporters" were indeed attempting an insurrection as you say, what stopped them? They were in the Capitol Building in overwhelming numbers. Why go that far with so many people with the same goal to stop the electoral college from confirming Biden only to walk away without completing the goal set forth upon them by President Trump? Did they all have the same change of heart right at the end or is it more plausible that it never was the goal and the Democratic party through their propaganda convinced you to believe their ruse?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I am off to bed but I will leave you with these thoughts...

Riddle me this. If the "Trump supporters" were indeed attempting an insurrection as you say, what stopped them? They were in the Capitol Building in overwhelming numbers. Why go that far with so many people with the same goal to stop the electoral college from confirming Biden only to walk away without completing the goal set forth upon them by President Trump? Did they all have the same change of heart right at the end or is it more plausible that it never was the goal and the Democratic party through their propaganda convinced you to believe their ruse?

The fact that you think it is all a hoax means you are too facking stupid to even discuss it.
Honestly, not a goddam brain cell in your head.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The fact that you think it is all a hoax means you are too facking stupid to even discuss it.
Honestly, not a goddam brain cell in your head.

I ask questions. I did not make statements on my opinions. The fact that you can't answer those questions shows the answers never entered your mind and that you are 100% behind what your party told you happened. This means you are making a choice to believe them without question. They could tell you anything and as long as it opposes the republican party, you will go along with it. You are as biased as they come.

Why discuss anything political with you when you will always follow, believe or stick to what your party has told you and not be open minded? Your actions give you only one response when talking politics and that is to argue... hey, you do that already. Go figure.