Which states have had mass mail-voting for a decade? Your post and its conclusions make very little sense in relation to what I said. But to continue on your tangent...
A bipartisan commission in 2005 (Commission on Federal Election Reform) headed by Jim Baker and Jimmy Carter found that "Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud." -
https://www.thenationalsentinel.com...-the-largest-source-of-potential-voter-fraud/
And yet, going into the counting process of this election which democrats knew would be contentious, they see no problem sending Trump observers home for the night and then finding a 150k ballot dump that's 97% for Biden, or covering the windows of the counting room so public observes cannot watch the process unfold. The now third flashdrive found in Georgia from a pro-Trump district that was "forgot to be uploaded", etc. Suddenly the party of 'Russia hacked the 2016 election" is now the party of "the election is unhackable".
Taking a look at Oregon's election records over the past 30 years could get rid of other state's vote by mail fears.
www.opb.org
"Oregon voters finally settled the matter in 1998 when they overwhelmingly voted to expand mail-in voting to primary and general elections. Two years later, Oregon became the
first state in the U.S. to conduct a presidential election with mail-in voting. That election saw a whopping 79% voter turnout, according to an
Oregon secretary of state's office timeline.
So since Oregon is a vote-by-mail veteran, there’s probably been years of voter fraud recorded in the state too, right?
According to Keisling, not so much."
If they're the largest source of potential voter fraud then you're still talking less than .0025% because those are just the numbers... Most fraud claims are contested and found to be false, even before Trump started sounding the bullhorn on every single one of them like they were investigated facts.
The Trump observers were never sent home, if they left it's their own fault. They covered the windows because the people were harassing them, people by the way that had no right to observe. The Trump team's observers were in there with them and it was their job. The observation argument has already been thrown out of court in more than one state when it was made clear they were given ample opportunity to observe. The late "ballot dumps" for Biden are the result of Trump rattling on for months to scare his voters away from mail in voting so that the red mirage would be even stronger than it was already going to be. So he could then stand on this soapbox and spread lies... Many states weren't allowed to start counting mail in votes until the in person votes were counted.. is it really surprising to you that most mail in votes went to Biden? Honestly? Also, 97%? I doubt it, source for that needed... The missing votes were from Trump counties that it was human error. The audit would have caught it regardless of the lawsuits. It wasn't democrats controlling those stations, it's just people who failed to submit them when they thought they had. Some have been rightfully fired over that, but as I said, it wouldn't affect the final tally because every state is audited and that's exactly what they're looking for during those: missing precincts.
I don't think Russia hacked the election in 2016 except for potentially miami-dades county. Regardless I'm smart enough to understand it wouldn't have made a difference if Hillary got Florida because addition isn't very hard. They certainly attempted to play a role, but I think all they really succeeded at is making people mad and exhausted with the election online (but so did the media) and probably influencing Trump quite a bit.. But hacking the election results themselves? Nah.. They harvested data using hacks, that's different imo. Democrats do a lot of stupid shit, it doesn't make you any less wrong when you're wrong, even if some of them are hypocrites.
