- Thread Starter
- #916
I grabbed my girlfriend by the *****. She consented. That's now ****? Try not to let your bias overrule logic.Trump literally said he grabs women by the ***** #raper
I grabbed my girlfriend by the *****. She consented. That's now ****? Try not to let your bias overrule logic.Trump literally said he grabs women by the ***** #raper
Next time a black person is released from jail for murdering another black person, rehabilitate them in your home because "black lives matter."I mean, you're focusing on all of the things related to the protest except the actual protest and the death of George, so count me as doubtful. Black lives matter.
Do you even know how qualified immunity works? Have you read the code and the interpretation via case law?All lives matter man, nobody is saying anything different on here. But, revoking qualified immunity isn't going to change shit. Just like the severe penalties for committing serious crimes hasn't stopped criminals from committing them. Hopefully, cops will be forced to wear body cameras and be held more accountable for excessive force on any race of people.
Immunity within reason. As it stands, it's far too broad. LEO shouldn't be able to violate your rights knowingly, claim qualified immunity because of their complacency, and then have the town pay out hundreds of thousands of dollars to settle a lawsuit.Well first, friend, we have to get ignorant people to STOP BREAKING THE LAW!!!
I will say it again, it is sad that we have to babysit all these criminals.
I am not a government official. They are elected to make these decisions, create these laws for us for the greater good of ALL citizens. When you have people constantly violating the law with no regard for other citizens then there will be tension for everyone. What we don't need is a bunch of ******* coddling these criminals because the interactions with them may get rough. Police should have some immunity as it is necessary to do their job. Use your common sense.
Most crimes are committed by what race? That is not racial profiling, those are statistics.
Inner city crimes are more common. Most inner city residence are what color? This too is not racial profiling, these are statistics.
Describing a suspect and including skin color is not racial profiling, this is called a description of a suspect.
I never once mentioned 1966. The wild west was between the 1860's and 1890's.
Right? Where else would you virtue signal to make up for your insecuritiesOh yeah, and no interwebs.
I literally have zero insecurities bro. Not a one.Right? Where else would you virtue signal to make up for your insecurities
Your inability to admit you have insecurities is an insecurity in itself.I literally have zero insecurities bro. Not a one.
Your inability to realize I have no insecurities obviously makes you insecure as fuck, doesn't it my little beta friend. What do I have to be insecure about? Worrying is a waste of time.Your inability to admit you have insecurities is an insecurity in itself.
So been waiting for this. I got you broNow they are wanting funding cut for law enforcement. L.A. has said sure, that's a good idea, let's do it. Other citys have also said ok, let's do it.
Prediction: Crime Rates Rise.