- Thread Starter
- #886
You don't think the Clinton's are bad? You protect rapists?Bruh really. Clinton woman bad, lol
You don't think the Clinton's are bad? You protect rapists?Bruh really. Clinton woman bad, lol
I'm here for the **** bro. As well as you. I'm mean you do support the ****** in chiefYou don't think the Clinton's are bad? You protect rapists?
Name one man who hasn't. It would be #******Trump literally said he grabs women by the ***** #raper
See half of being intelligent is having a good memory. And well you don't my friend. When this first dropped. You where quick to post how no one speaks like that.Name one man who hasn't. It would be #******
My memory is fine. I don't often make it a point to focus on irrelevant things.See half of being intelligent is having a good memory. And well you don't my friend. When this first dropped. You where quick to post how no one speaks like that.
My memory is fine. I don't often make it a point to focus on irrelevant things.
That's because ignorant criminals breaking the law have nothing to do with George Floyd now do they?I mean, you're focusing on all of the things related to the protest except the actual protest and the death of George, so count me as doubtful. Black lives matter.
That's because ignorant criminals breaking the law have nothing to do with George Floyd now do they?
If you ***** can actually read I addressed the actual crime against Mr. Floyd and said that his family should at minimum be compensated. That's the problem with blind people, they only see what they want to see and comment accordingly.
Not blind at all bro, I just think black lives matter. It's okay if you don't, you should still want qualified immunity revoked regardless. We don't need to agree on anything except for that. Should the police be more immune than soldiers in a warzone? Should police be immune from prosecution so long as they "were scared"?
You never answered my questions before, which is why I'm going to be short with you now.
They should be forced to wear body cams, of course (plus it'll save their department money in the long run). How exactly do you think they should be held more accountable though without a punishment shift? Ultimately it's a legal issue. The police department fired them almost immediately, it's about the law not holding them accountable. Before their indictments they could have easily gotten another job at a different police station nearby.All lives matter man, nobody is saying anything different on here. But, revoking qualified immunity isn't going to change shit. Just like the severe penalties for committing serious crimes hasn't stopped criminals from committing them. Hopefully, cops will be forced to wear body cameras and be held more accountable for excessive force on any race of people.