After looking real hard at there line its hard to decide out of the 2 choices. Can any of you testify as to which is the better. I'm looking at using a smaller 2 ch and a larger 4 ch. If money was not the deciding factor, which would you choose?
What the hell are you basing that on? "Probably in the same price range" would indicate that you've never owned one and have therefore never done side by side tests and even if you had it would have been a "This amp fit my needs better" rather than an all encompassing statement.yup, Arc xxks are better than Zapco References and probably in the same price range, just not as flexible as the C2ks
Yes I've have played enough with References- my brother in law matter a fact runs a 1100.1 and a 360.4 in his Honda Passport THAT I GOT FOR HIM through my dealer!!!!What the hell are you basing that on? "Probably in the same price range" would indicate that you've never owned one and have therefore never done side by side tests and even if you had it would have been a "This amp fit my needs better" rather than an all encompassing statement.
I have never played with an arc amp, so if what you say is true, and I have no reason to doubt you, then you have exponentially more experience on the subject than I. I would like to point out, however, that the zapco amps have a balanced input and from what I can tell on the arc website the xxks do not. So, maybe the arc 'sounds better', can push 1000 watts x 4 into 4 ohms stereo, have a 72db/octave crossover and cost $10. That's great and 99% of the people in the world would want to buy one but there is also going to be that 1% that want to run a fully balanced setup and the arc just isn't going to be able to do that for them. That's all I was saying.Yes I've have played enough with References- my brother in law matter a fact runs a 1100.1 and a 360.4 in his Honda Passport THAT I GOT FOR HIM through my dealer!!!!So F$%& OFF, and please throw in your OWN 0.02 cents