Xtant vs Phoenix Gold

[bikeboy24]

I'm debating whether I want to change my current setup. Right now, I'm only using the front channels of my Xtant 603x (pre mitek), to power my Focal 165k2's in the front.

I have the option of getting a Xenon 100.4.

How will these compare sq wise? I think the PG Xenon will put out a bit more power.

Click to read more...

 

[John3000 10+ year member]

Both amps would be great, personally I would go with the xenon just in case you ever switch setups 1-4 ohm stable is a nice feature. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[bikejunkie223 10+ year member]

Keep the Xtant, it's a much cleaner amp, and you already own it. If you want to try something new you can, but I'd just run what you have as it's a real nice peice.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

get a xenon

 

[squeak9798 5,000+ posts]

Keep the Xtant.

Power differences are minimal, and you won't hear a difference between them SQ wise.

 

[bikejunkie223 10+ year member]

Xtant's have the stainless steel thing going too (teh hotness!)

 

[iagrdshaka 5,000+ posts]

Keep the Xtant. No hassle then

 

[denim 5,000+ posts]

Keep the Xtant.
Power differences are minimal, and you won't hear a difference between them SQ wise.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 

[Mike75 10+ year member]

What do you guys think about the Phoenix Gold R15.0:1 Octane-R 15.0:1 amp? What is better the Phoenix Gold series or Xenon series?...Also, what do you guys think about the Audiobahn A8000T...The Audiobahn is $150, and the PG is $250...The Audiobahn says 800 watts rms @ 2 ohms, and the PG says 1000 watts rms @ 2 ohms...I am needing to power 2 Boston Acoustic G5-10" subs, each needing 450 watts rms (as Boston says)....If anyone could give me any info I would greatly appreciate it..Thanks