Currently have one 10" Alpine SWS-1043D (300W RMS/ 900W max) in 1 cu-ft sealed box ...
... powered by my Alpine PDX-5's sub channel rated at 300W with birth sheet showing 424W.
I had planned to add the 2nd SWS-1043D that I bought at the same time in a 2nd similar box, but with limited space I'm now thinking of just putting in a replacement single sub: a 12" Alpine SWR-1222D (500W RMS/ 1500W max; power range 200W-500W).
The weird thing is, Alpine's manual calls for a sealed box smaller than the 10" SWS I have now.
Alpine says the 10" SWS's optimum sealed box is 1.0 cu-ft , whereas the 12" SWR optimum sealed box is only 0.85 cu-ft.
Isn't that strange? A bigger sub needing to go in a smaller box??
If I went with the 12" SWR, would this pound noticeably harder than the 10" SWS, powered by my "424" watt sub channel? ... or would I just be wasting my $??
Thanks as always ...
... powered by my Alpine PDX-5's sub channel rated at 300W with birth sheet showing 424W.
I had planned to add the 2nd SWS-1043D that I bought at the same time in a 2nd similar box, but with limited space I'm now thinking of just putting in a replacement single sub: a 12" Alpine SWR-1222D (500W RMS/ 1500W max; power range 200W-500W).
The weird thing is, Alpine's manual calls for a sealed box smaller than the 10" SWS I have now.
Alpine says the 10" SWS's optimum sealed box is 1.0 cu-ft , whereas the 12" SWR optimum sealed box is only 0.85 cu-ft.
Isn't that strange? A bigger sub needing to go in a smaller box??
If I went with the 12" SWR, would this pound noticeably harder than the 10" SWS, powered by my "424" watt sub channel? ... or would I just be wasting my $??
Thanks as always ...
