Winners only.

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

👁

“Across eight experiments, Cutright and Mustafa Karataş of Nazarbayev University, found that “actively thinking about God” promotes acceptance of AI recommendations in a variety of contexts, including in the choice of movies, financial products, dental treatments and romantic partners.

“Thinking about God affects how we see things in our environment and our decision-making,” Cutright said. “One day it hit me that AI and technology are similar in a lot of ways to religion, in that both of them are often seen as diminishing the role of humans. We wanted to see if the salience of God affects how people rely on AI.””

““Counter to most people’s intuition, areas with more religious populations may be good places to start with AI-based recommendations,” she said.”

God & AI: Believe in the former, more trust in the latter, says Duke researcher | WRAL TechWire

Research suggests thinking about God makes people more likely to trust AI recommendations. So says Duke Professor Keisha Cutright who found a link between religion and greater reliance on AI recommendations

wraltechwire.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Am I a "doctor" no. Relevant training... uh, yeah, I have some. Did I use that professionally? Yup, for a time, I sure did. Was experience had from it. Sure was. Do I still get asked for my opinions from old co-workers still in the field? Yup, sure do.

You are speaking from ignorance again Rob.

You treated patients? Or were you virology and immunology research?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

My skills are fine.

Which means you are OK with it.

You admit to seeing welfare fraud occur but choose not to act, so you must be OK with it.

You'd rather I just piss straight in your mouth then?

BINGO. You see that act the same as pissing in a billion gallons of water.
Probably why you think any presidential election in your lifetime was decided by one vote.
You claim extensive science knowledge but don’t know dilution?
Oof.

Does that 1% rate bother you? Of course it does... you claimed it was much higher didn't ya?

No, I didn’t. I provided a chart that showed the stats over time.
Math is obviously very confusing to you.
Maybe avoid arguing what you don’t understand.

LOL Look at you. You don't even put a number to the amount of fraudulent votes. Your left leaning brain downplays even that to "a few bad votes". You don't even call them fraudulent, you called them "bad" as if they are discarded food. You're pathetic.

They would have to be 3 million to matter.
Show me where the number found even broke the 500 mark. M
STATISTICALLY insignificant.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Welcome to the world of sarcastic jokes. Apparently you never get them what with your "literal" view of the world.

All of your drivel up to now has just been “sarcastic jokes”?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You treated patients? Or were you virology and immunology research?

What if I did?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You admit to seeing welfare fraud occur but choose not to act, so you must be OK with it.

Do I have the authority to detain and then prosecute these people? Perhaps you people should have better securities in place.

BINGO. You see that act the same as pissing in a billion gallons of water.
Probably why you think any presidential election in your lifetime was decided by one vote.
You claim extensive science knowledge but don’t know dilution?
Oof.

That is 3 claims YOU are making telling me what I think.

No, I didn’t. I provided a chart that showed the stats over time.
Math is obviously very confusing to you.
Maybe avoid arguing what you don’t understand.

Yes you did. Stop lying. Liar.

They would have to be 3 million to matter.
Show me where the number found even broke the 500 mark. M
STATISTICALLY insignificant.

See, you are admitting you are ok with voter fraud up 2,999,999 votes. That should be enough to swing any election in the favor of the left huh

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

All of your drivel up to now has just been “sarcastic jokes”?

As much as your facts are I guess.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What if I did?

Then you would have the med background you claim to have when questioning all of medical science.

Otherwise you’re just some guy who has an uneducated opinion contrary to medical science, and insists he is right without any way to support his claim.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Do I have the authority to detain and then prosecute these people? Perhaps you people should have better securities in place.

So you’re OK with people committing fraud because you don’t want to make even the smallest effort to stop it. Not even a 2-minute phone call.
Got it.

That is 3 claims YOU are making telling me what I think.

YOU are the guy who tells us we should know what he thinks or means just by reading his posts.
If you don’t like it, then stop requesting it.

Yes you did. Stop lying. Liar.

Afraid I did. And there was a good bit of discussion amongst those who understood the chart/graph, and those who didn’t.

See, you are admitting you are ok with voter fraud up 2,999,999 votes. That should be enough to swing any election in the favor of the left huh

Admitting the existence of inconsequential voter fraud is not saying I am “OK” with it, any more than admitting you hit women is me saying I am “OK” with it.
I don’t like either situation, but I am unable to effect change about them.

YOU however, can actually do something to prevent welfare fraud, but refuse to. So, you must be OK with it continuing to happen.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Then you would have the med background you claim to have when questioning all of medical science.

Otherwise you’re just some guy who has an uneducated opinion contrary to medical science, and insists he is right without any way to support his claim.

So your question was pointless. Got it.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So you’re OK with people committing fraud because you don’t want to make even the smallest effort to stop it. Not even a 2-minute phone call.
Got it.

What, and put you out of a job??? Come on man.

YOU are the guy who tells us we should know what he thinks or means just by reading his posts.
If you don’t like it, then stop requesting it.

If you want to use words like that... I'd just say this "I'd like you to give a shit enough to attempt to comprehend what you read". I like mine better.

Afraid I did. And there was a good bit of discussion amongst those who understood the chart/graph, and those who didn’t.

Now you are saying you did. Got it.

Admitting the existence of inconsequential voter fraud is not saying I am “OK” with it, any more than admitting you hit women is me saying I am “OK” with it.
I don’t like either situation, but I am unable to effect change about them.

Oh Rob, it's hard to argue with me when I play by your rules huh. Now you lash out with a personal attack. Make sure you get it right. It was one woman, my sister. I know you want to make it more dramatic by saying women and you seem to be OK with lying... like you are when you molest 2nd graders. Yeah, we get it Rob.

YOU however, can actually do something to prevent welfare fraud, but refuse to. So, you must be OK with it continuing to happen.

It's not my job. You want me to do something about it then pay me money. I don't work for free.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What, and put you out of a job??? Come on man.

Sounds like an excuse to do nothing while complaining. Hypocrite.

If you want to use words like that... I'd just say this "I'd like you to give a shit enough to attempt to comprehend what you read". I like mine better.

Then stop being obtuse. Say what you mean.

Now you are saying you did. Got it.

Oh Rob, it's hard to argue with me when I play by your rules huh. Now you lash out with a personal attack. Make sure you get it right. It was one woman, my sister. I know you want to make it more dramatic by saying women and you seem to be OK with lying... like you are when you molest 2nd graders. Yeah, we get it Rob.

A personal attack? No, it’s just facts. And it was your sister, another woman, and you said earlier you still do it.
Why do you consider facts about you a “personal attack”?
You must realize those facts are not good, huh?

It's not my job. You want me to do something about it then pay me money. I don't work for free.

So then you’re obviously OK with it happening if you don’t spend even two minutes to take action against it, when you COULD.
Hypocrite.