Stop trying to simplify what I have said in order to support your narrative.So if on average men hold a biological advantage...why the fck would you support biological men in women's sports...
I’ll say it yet again because you are being obtuse (and I’m not talking about angle measurements): PEOPLE OF SIMILAR ABILITIES SHOULD COMPETE SIMILARLY.
A PLAYER WHO IS 5’7” and 140 LBS SHOULD NOT BE ON THE FIELD OR COURT WHEN EVERYONE ELSE IS 6’+ AND OVER 200 LBS
SIMILARLY, A PLAYER WHO IS 6’+ AND OVER 200 LBS SHOULD NOT BE ON THE FIELD WHEN EVERYONE ELSE IS IN THE RANGE OF 5’7” AND 140 LBS.
THEY WON’T LET GUYS WRESTLE WHEN THEY ARE 6 OUNCES OUT OF THEIR WEIGHT CLASS. THEY WON’T LET BOXERS BOX WHEN THEY ARE OUT OF THEIR WEIGHT CLASS.
IF TRANSGENDERISM IS SUCH A HUGE CONCERN, FIGURE IT THE FVCK OUT. IT ISN’T BRAIN SURGERY.
YOU ARE THE ONE WHO SAID CAPABLE WOMEN ATHLETES ARE NOT THE NORM. GUESS WHAT? TRANSGENDER ATHLETES ARE EVEN LESS THE NORM.
IF BEYOND-NORMAL WOMEN ATHLETES ARE NOT A CONCERN, THEN WHY THE HUGE UPROAR OVER THE STATISTICALLY VERY RARE ***** ATHLETE?
IF THE CONCEPT CONFUSES ANYONE THAT MUCH, THEY MIGHT BE A FVCKING MORON.
Last edited:
