Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
So if on average men hold a biological advantage...why the fck would you support biological men in women's sports...
Stop trying to simplify what I have said in order to support your narrative.

I’ll say it yet again because you are being obtuse (and I’m not talking about angle measurements): PEOPLE OF SIMILAR ABILITIES SHOULD COMPETE SIMILARLY.
A PLAYER WHO IS 5’7” and 140 LBS SHOULD NOT BE ON THE FIELD OR COURT WHEN EVERYONE ELSE IS 6’+ AND OVER 200 LBS

SIMILARLY, A PLAYER WHO IS 6’+ AND OVER 200 LBS SHOULD NOT BE ON THE FIELD WHEN EVERYONE ELSE IS IN THE RANGE OF 5’7” AND 140 LBS.

THEY WON’T LET GUYS WRESTLE WHEN THEY ARE 6 OUNCES OUT OF THEIR WEIGHT CLASS. THEY WON’T LET BOXERS BOX WHEN THEY ARE OUT OF THEIR WEIGHT CLASS.

IF TRANSGENDERISM IS SUCH A HUGE CONCERN, FIGURE IT THE FVCK OUT. IT ISN’T BRAIN SURGERY.

YOU ARE THE ONE WHO SAID CAPABLE WOMEN ATHLETES ARE NOT THE NORM. GUESS WHAT? TRANSGENDER ATHLETES ARE EVEN LESS THE NORM.
IF BEYOND-NORMAL WOMEN ATHLETES ARE NOT A CONCERN, THEN WHY THE HUGE UPROAR OVER THE STATISTICALLY VERY RARE ***** ATHLETE?

IF THE CONCEPT CONFUSES ANYONE THAT MUCH, THEY MIGHT BE A FVCKING MORON.
 
Last edited:
These biological males are taking opportunities away from women...whether it be scholarships or endorsements...that's an opportunity lost...
THAT is your big concern? Scholarships?
OK. Good. Tell us how many of the 180,000+ NCAA scholarships given out each year are being stolen by transgender athletes, and in which sport it's happening.
And tell us how the endorsement deals are similarly being stolen.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't matter if it's 1 scholarship lost...there are potential financial benefits to competing in any athletic event...putting men in women's competitions takes away not only a slot a woman should've had to compete but also skews the odds of a biological woman actually winning ffs...
 
It doesn't matter if it's 1 scholarship lost...there are potential financial benefits to competing in any athletic event...putting men in women's competitions takes away not only a slot a woman should've had to compete but also skews the odds of a biological woman actually winning ffs...
OK. Good. Present the evidence that a scholarship was "stolen" by a transgender athlete, be it a male who transitioned to female, OR female who transitioned to male.

Provide the physical stats on the athlete/s who did this.
 
Women fought to have their leagues,events, competitions...why is it so wrong for ***** people to put in the fckn effort to create their own...
You describe women athletes who can compete at the same level as men as "the exception". There are FAR less transgender athletes than superior women athletes, but now you want them to make their own league?
Your argument is self-defeating.

You're using the exception as the rule ffs...the more you "prove" your point on this...the more ignorant you sound 🤣
You don't like using the exception as the rule, but for ***** people you want to use the exception as the rule.
 
Last edited:
It's obvious you haven't spent much time looking into any of this...I'll admit my interest in the ***** athletic stuff is purely selfish...I have several young girls I'm my family that love playing sports...and if they wanted to compete against men then that's their choice...but to compete in a woman's competition and have to compete against men is trash...and frankly anyone that's cool with that is trash...
 
It's obvious you haven't spent much time looking into any of this...I'll admit my interest in the ***** athletic stuff is purely selfish...I have several young girls I'm my family that love playing sports...and if they wanted to compete against men then that's their choice...but to compete in a woman's competition and have to compete against men is trash...and frankly anyone that's cool with that is trash...
In other words, you don't care whether the players are comparable in ability and physique, you just don't want them to compete against someone who has been surgically altered from male to female genitalia, or is a male being allowed to play on a female team.
Accurate?
 
It's kinda funny that this stuff is getting the neocon's panties in a bunch. Ever been to Disneyland or Disneyworld? It was a Pridefest long before chopping off you wiener became sound medical practice.
Its been over +30yrs so I’m good, but its when I learned Walt Disney made
na zi propaganda films for Germany that was no go. Also learn a lot hidden ****** stuff that’s programmed into its cartoons. Now It’s turn Marvel into woke feminist propaganda so I guess it’s not too from its founders roots.
 
In other words, you don't care whether the players are comparable in ability and physique, you just don't want them to compete against someone who has been surgically altered from male to female genitalia, or is a male being allowed to play on a female team.
Accurate?
Or it's just acknowledging males have a built advantage over females in athletic endeavors, which is why we separate them in the first place. It's also acknowledging, that just because somebody chops off Mr Happy doesn't make that advantage disappear. Then there's the whole title ix issue.

But let's explore what would be the outcome of your approach. We'd have an all male team A and an all male team B and maybe by the time we get team C some women might start making the team. There would be no such thing as women's sports team. All to accommodate some fellas who feel that they're really women (but they aren't) and should be treated like women in each every way (even though they are not women).

If we keep going down this rabbit hole of insanity we eventually end up with professors claiming there is no such thing as "biological gender." Not as conspiratorial as QAnon, but equally as crazy. The funny thing is these ***** folks claim gender isn't binary, but then they insist they belong on the binary woman's team.
 
So you think two people of similar abilities are not capable of competing against each other becasue one was born with a pen*s, and one with a vag*na?
Maybe you were too young for Billie Jean vs Bobby. Ever hear of Jackie Tonawanda? 2nd round knockout against a male boxer. Danica Patrick? Race car driver and Indy winner. Carissa Moore? beat men in professional surfboard competitions.

But yeah, men are inherently superior against women who are similarly built and have the same abilities. It's especially evident when female arm wrestlers go up against males.

Riggs was 55 when he lost to 29 yr old Billie Jean. Race car driving doesn't really qualify since it's the car doing the heavy lifting. You want to start throwing women into the ring with men?
 
These biological males are taking opportunities away from women...whether it be scholarships or endorsements...that's an opportunity lost...

It could be whole leagues. Imagine what the WNBA or WNLS will look like in ~5 years if ***** athletes are allowed in their leagues. Like I said, there is a simple solution, you're not really a woman just because you "feel" you are, so here's a new league for you...
 
Ahhh, so you ARE just like Thxone. Completely ignore any factors that contradict your theory.
He did that with his "choice but not a choice" theory.

You are saying that women who have similar capabilities to men are the exception, therefore they do not exist and all men are superior to women in all sports.
Pretty scientific conclusion there, bud.

It's comical how people like you (anti-maskers, anti-vaxxers, science deniers) come up with all these theories that collapse under even the most simple scrutiny or challenge, yet you hang onto them for dear life while shouting "everyone else is making decisions based on their feelings!".
Ironic.

Women's sports would be completely gutted using "your rules." Women athletes get the short end of the stick enough as it is, lets not completely destroy their opportunities because a small group of guys think they're women and are willing to chop off Mr Happy, but still aren't comprehending there's a big difference between a "real woman" and "modified male."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,113,894
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top