Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I never claimed he did. YOU claimed the "release of COVID" and the "faked mail-in votes". You get to prove that. But...you only need to prove the amount Trump LOST by are faked.
That's only 3,000,000.

So, tell us all how it was done, by whom, and why the GOP is so inept they haven't figured it out or gotten any proof yet.
Did you get word of the day toilet paper or something? You really keep pushing that word "inept" like you want it to catch on desperately. Of course Democrats released COVID so they could use mail in voting to steal the election in the night. How else were they going to win the election? This wasn't a scheme they just cooked up for Trump, they have been doing election fraud for years and years. It helps when you can sway all but 1 or 2 news sources to the far left too. Control what is said on the news, control what is said on private social media sites. 81,000,000 votes. I'm sure :rolleyes:

NOTHING TO SEE HERE!!!

"I get to prove that" No, you get to disprove it. You are the one calling B.S. all the time so clearly you know better than all of us... so prove it.
 
41418


41419
 
Did you get word of the day toilet paper or something? You really keep pushing that word "inept" like you want it to catch on desperately. Of course Democrats released COVID so they could use mail in voting to steal the election in the night. How else were they going to win the election? This wasn't a scheme they just cooked up for Trump, they have been doing election fraud for years and years. It helps when you can sway all but 1 or 2 news sources to the far left too. Control what is said on the news, control what is said on private social media sites. 81,000,000 votes. I'm sure :rolleyes:

NOTHING TO SEE HERE!!!

"I get to prove that" No, you get to disprove it. You are the one calling B.S. all the time so clearly you know better than all of us... so prove it.
Inept is one of the best words, given the light you paint them in. Incompetent is another. Most other synonyms (inexpert, unskilled, amateurish) don't convey the right meaning.

There you go again, thinking repetition of the fantasy makes it a truth. Instead of repeating your dreams, TELL US HOW IT WAS DONE.

Yes, you "get to prove that". it's called the "burden of proof", and here's a great little quote from an entire writeup about it:

"Most people as young children appear to have a “commonsense” understanding of the burden of proof. When young people hear a claim being made and it is, in their minds and experience, an extraordinary claim being made, quite often the response is one of asking for something to support the claim. The most common retorts are along the line of “Prove it”, “What makes you say that”, “Show me” or something like “Oh, yeah?”. Somewhere along the way too many humans lose that sense and too often suspend their inclination to accept the principles underlying the “Burden of Proof”.

"The burden of proof is always on the person making an assertion or proposition. Shifting the burden of proof, a special case of argumentum ad ignorantium, is the fallacy of putting the burden of proof on the person who denies or questions the assertion being made. The source of the fallacy is the assumption that something is true unless proven otherwise. "


YOU have made the outrageous claim that COVID was "released" by Democrats to influence the vote, AND that it was done by fraudulent mail-in votes. The burden of proof is on YOU.

Welcome to a concept you should have learned as a child, that is old enough to have a Latin name: Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat
 
Inept is one of the best words, given the light you paint them in. Incompetent is another. Most other synonyms (inexpert, unskilled, amateurish) don't convey the right meaning.

There you go again, thinking repetition of the fantasy makes it a truth. Instead of repeating your dreams, TELL US HOW IT WAS DONE.

Yes, you "get to prove that". it's called the "burden of proof", and here's a great little quote from an entire writeup about it:

"Most people as young children appear to have a “commonsense” understanding of the burden of proof. When young people hear a claim being made and it is, in their minds and experience, an extraordinary claim being made, quite often the response is one of asking for something to support the claim. The most common retorts are along the line of “Prove it”, “What makes you say that”, “Show me” or something like “Oh, yeah?”. Somewhere along the way too many humans lose that sense and too often suspend their inclination to accept the principles underlying the “Burden of Proof”.

"The burden of proof is always on the person making an assertion or proposition. Shifting the burden of proof, a special case of argumentum ad ignorantium, is the fallacy of putting the burden of proof on the person who denies or questions the assertion being made. The source of the fallacy is the assumption that something is true unless proven otherwise. "


YOU have made the outrageous claim that COVID was "released" by Democrats to influence the vote, AND that it was done by fraudulent mail-in votes. The burden of proof is on YOU.

Welcome to a concept you should have learned as a child, that is old enough to have a Latin name: Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat
We get it, you like to Google and repeat other peoples words.

You have made the claim that there was no significant voter fraud... Prove it. It's still a claim even if it is opposite of mine however you call bullshit on anything opposing your claim so PROVE IT.
 
So he pleaded the 5th for 6 hours. What do you care if he uses his constitutionally protected rights?
Do as I say, not as I do?

"Trump has had a lot to say about the Fifth Amendment in the past.
“You see the mob takes the Fifth,” he said. “If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”

Another time, he said, “Fifth Amendment. Fifth Amendment. Fifth Amendment. Horrible.
During a presidential debate, he said,
When you have your staff taking the Fifth Amendment, taking the Fifth, so they’re not prosecuted, when you have the man that set up the illegal server taking the Fifth, I think it’s disgraceful."
 
You posted names kid. Post some links where it shows that they pleaded the fifth for six hours under oath. Is that too hard for you? You said it now prove it. It's that easy. Your lack of facts amazes me lol.

pleading the 5th is pleading the 5th. why does it matter if they did it once in a trial or for 24 hours? does it make it worst the longer you plead the 5th?? lmao

and I gave you their names. I assume you have google. otherwise, if you don't even know who i'm talking about, you should just close your mouth and find something else to do with your day.

and props to Trump and his lawyers for pleading the 5th. Fukk those Feds.
 
Do as I say, not as I do?

"Trump has had a lot to say about the Fifth Amendment in the past.
“You see the mob takes the Fifth,” he said. “If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”

Another time, he said, “Fifth Amendment. Fifth Amendment. Fifth Amendment. Horrible.
During a presidential debate, he said,
When you have your staff taking the Fifth Amendment, taking the Fifth, so they’re not prosecuted, when you have the man that set up the illegal server taking the Fifth, I think it’s disgraceful."
Irrelevant. It IS his protected right to plead the 5th. You don't have to like it, most control freaks don't.
 
We get it, you like to Google and repeat other peoples words.

You have made the claim that there was no significant voter fraud... Prove it. It's still a claim even if it is opposite of mine however you call bullshit on anything opposing your claim so PROVE IT.
BURDEN OF PROOF, CHIEF.
You claimed a conspiracy, now provide the proof of it.
Still waiting.
Got nothing?
 
Is this what you do when you can't back up your own views? Burden of proof applies to everyone but you? Was it the vaccine that gave you immunity to burden of proof? Are you special?
I'm sorry you still can't understand a concept most people innately know from childhood on. Maybe you cauld ask your babysitter to explain it to you?

NO ONE was walking around saying "there is no evidence of massive voter fraud" until the big orange idiot claimed it, and all you simpletons believed him and started parroting it.

That puts YOU in the driver's seat as far as the burden of proof goes. YOU parrot the claim, YOU get to prove it. SANE people get to demand the proof of the claim.

No matter how hard you try to spin it, that's how things work when it comes to presenting a previously unfounded claim.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,106,927
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top