Are all those things just general happenings, or do you think they are specific, happened only to Trump, and targeted at Trump?
- Status
Lame Rob
Let me help you....1000's of actual funny memes, dont let your head explode
politicsTOO Memes & GIFs - Imgflip
PoliticsTOO is Imgflip’s flagship liberal stream: where progressive, liberal,...
well i would say that spying on a presidents campaign then paying for a fake dossier to fraudulently launch a fake investigation then bring up articles of impeachment for not cooperating with said fake investigation was pretty targeted and aimed directly at Trump
leftys constantly throw his impeachments and crap up as a negative. . . but its really not if its not costing him any supporters.
Oh absolutely. Everything was fake. A huge set of conspiracies that everyone was involved in just to make Trump look bad. Fake impeachments for fake abuse of power and fake obstruction of justice, voted on and approved by fake Democrats and Republicans.
And no one has spilled the beans on all this fakery yet. All in perfect collusion with each other.
If the investigation was "fake" then why did he feel the need to obstruct? "Let them look. They will find nothing." should have been his answer instead of fighting against it.
it was proven that the dossier was false and paid for by the Clintons
the Fisa warrant was granted under the pretense of a fake dossier
the investigation had absolutely no merit and in the end it only proved that the REAL collusion was between the Clintons and Russia
and the first impeachment was for not cooperating with the fake investigation.
i wouldn't have cooperated either
you have a better argument for the second impeachment i suppose.... but still a mostly partisan impeachment that did little in dissuading his supporters
two of the republicans who voted to impeach trump in the second impeachment has already conceded defeat ..... guess the Trumpers remembered????
bunch of try-hards failing at everything really.
He was impeached for abuse of power and obstruction, not for the dossier.
He was impeached for incitement.
Impeachments aren't like a small-town council vote on getting a new water fountain.
Of course it was partisan. Were you awake or did you miss what happened with ANYONE who dare speak against him, even when totally valid?
Does it also upset you that the Clinton impeachment was partisan? And Nixon's?
And..the Steele Dossier was of little relevance to the impeachment. But of course, since much of it was discredited, Trump will tell you it was the ONLY thing. That's how it works.
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
Still running your mouth. Go fake like you care about something you nitwit.
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
Your whole facade is fake. Everyone on every forum you have been on knows you are a troll.
it has been proven the first impeachment had no merit and was just a leftists attack plain and simple. All the FACTS about that investigation just led to it all being complete and utter bullshit.
like i said, you could make more of a case for the second impeachment. . but meh, he basically got impeached for not doing something that he COULD have done. Im personally not convinced that he actually incited a riot on the capitol and I think most of the evidence against him was circumstantial and easily manipulated . . . but whatever
that's over simplifying it, the first impeachment was more of an attempted political hit job.
not much of any of it was valid lol
nope. their cases were more clear cut
again, i dont agree. without the dossier, there would have been no warrant. It was key to the entire thing.
i don't like or really listen to what comes out of Trumps mouth. I feel his policies were good for the most part, but his inability to filter himself or resist spewing things that can be weaponized and used against him was pretty embarrassing for a leader of the free world
with all that said. give me Trump over Creepy Joe any day of the week
Go tell everyone your dad and uncleS were in the military, as if it gives you some cachet, you fvcking borrowed-valor poseur.
it has been proven the first impeachment had no merit and was just a leftists attack plain and simple. All the FACTS about that investigation just led to it all being complete and utter bullshit.
Did he obstruct justice or not? Simple YES or NO question.
If this was just an attack, do we consider the impeachment of Clinton for a blowie an attack?
like i said, you could make more of a case for the second impeachment. . but meh, he basically got impeached for not doing something that he COULD have done. Im personally not convinced that he actually incited a riot on the capitol and I think most of the evidence against him was circumstantial and easily manipulated . . . but whatever
that's over simplifying it, the first impeachment was more of an attempted political hit job.
not much of any of it was valid lol
nope. their cases were more clear cut
again, I dont agree. without the dossier, there would have been no warrant. It was key to the entire thing.
No, it wasn't. Aside from the few proved facts, it was summarily dismissed.
i don't like or really listen to what comes out of Trumps mouth. I feel his policies were good for the most part, but his inability to filter himself or resist spewing things that can be weaponized and used against him was pretty embarrassing for a leader of the free world
Agreed.
with all that said. give me Trump over Creepy Joe any day of the week
Disregarding the person and looking at the state of the country with either one in power, I'll take Biden.
Funny that he is "Creepy Joe" when Trump has multiple **** accusations against him, including one by his now dead ex-wife, and another by a 13 y.o., along with many accusations, and even a self-admittance of ****** impropriety, not to mention the very public payoff of a hooker.
Did he obstruct justice or not? Simple YES or NO question.
If this was just an attack, do we consider the impeachment of Clinton for a blowie an attack?
like i said, you could make more of a case for the second impeachment. . but meh, he basically got impeached for not doing something that he COULD have done. Im personally not convinced that he actually incited a riot on the capitol and I think most of the evidence against him was circumstantial and easily manipulated . . . but whatever
that's over simplifying it, the first impeachment was more of an attempted political hit job.
not much of any of it was valid lol
nope. their cases were more clear cut
again, I dont agree. without the dossier, there would have been no warrant. It was key to the entire thing.
No, it wasn't. Aside from the few proved facts, it was summarily dismissed.
i don't like or really listen to what comes out of Trumps mouth. I feel his policies were good for the most part, but his inability to filter himself or resist spewing things that can be weaponized and used against him was pretty embarrassing for a leader of the free world
Agreed.
with all that said. give me Trump over Creepy Joe any day of the week
Disregarding the person and looking at the state of the country with either one in power, I'll take Biden.
Funny that he is "Creepy Joe" when Trump has multiple **** accusations against him, including one by his now dead ex-wife, and another by a 13 y.o., along with many accusations, and even a self-admittance of ****** impropriety, not to mention the very public payoff of a hooker.
Last edited:
honkyg^2
these all go to 11
- Status
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
About this thread
- Start date
- Participants
- Who Replied
- Replies
- 33,976
- Views
- 1,103,706
- Last reply date
- Last reply from
- Buck
