Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
It wouldn't matter if it was sold at a profit...that isn't what the strategic reserve is for...

So we were just supposed to sit on the reserve indefinitely??? Did oil prices drop in response to the sale/exchange of SPR stockpiles??? Seems like a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. If he doesn't use the SPR as intended, then oil prices stay high and Biden is the devil for not doing anything about oil prices. If Biden sells/exchanges SPR and the capitalist market we live in takes advantage of that and ships some of it overseas then Biden is a bastard for "selling oil to China." If Biden restricts what the free market does with the oil, then he's a commie or fascist or risks the oil not going to market in which case "you guys" would be laughing at his lack of business acumen.
 
39949
 
Again the nature of the reserves aren't to lower prices, send to other countries, or to turn a profit...they are an emergency stockpile for emergency usage like war or actual shortages (like during the Carter presidency)...crude oil has a very long shelf life...so it wasn't going bad anytime soon...
 
Excellent question. It's answered in an interview. Basically, he doesn't have the smoking gun. Here's my Reader Digest version based on what I could find. True the Vote (allegedly) gets a whistle blower calling them about this ballot box scam. Unfortunately, the whistle blower won't come forth, so he could be a GOP plant, a fictitious character or the real deal.

True the Vote then acquires geolocations of cell phones in areas of question and isolates cell phones that were in the area of 10+ ballot boxes. However, this is where it gets a little "grey" if you will. True the Vote used a 100 ft geofence and the geolocating was only accurate to within 30 feet, so I think what we really have is not people visiting 10+ ballot boxes but people that were within 130ft of 10+ ballot boxes. Being within 130 feet of 10+ ballot boxes is certainly a red flag and worth looking into.

However, that brings up some more issues. The majority of the boxes were at libraries, so could this be people who work for the library system, maybe a delivery guy who delivers to the libraries, etc. Could have been the guy in charge of picking up the ballots. I doubt that would account for 2000 people, but I wouldn't be surprised if it accounted for big chunk of that 2000; maybe there were mules, but only 1000 of them.

So this is where the video surveillance comes in. They have videos of individuals dropping off ballot(s) at a ballot box that they claim time corresponds to the geolocation of a mule. However, the alleged mule could be 130 feet away. As far as I can tell True the Vote hasn't released the geolocation data they have, although they've shared it with local authorities who've declined to follow-up.

So that's a considerable amount of "fishiness" for sure. But what I also find pretty fishy is that we have 2000 (alleged) mules at 10+ ballot boxes, but a not single one of them is caught on camera a second time. The other thing that strikes me as fishy is it's a huge operation to harvest the hundreds of thousands maybe ~million ballots to pull this off. Plus all the forgers you would need. So hundreds of thousands of people have kept quiet about this operation; that strikes me as highly unlikely. Furthermore, the checks and balances they have in place are good at filtering out multiple votes, dead voters, etc. So even if you crammed 1m fake votes into the system how many would actually end up getting toward Biden? And who is to say that some of these alleged mules weren't GOP operatives either attempting to sow distrust or stuffing the ballot box for Trump?

Here's where I distilled most of the information from. It's a Wash Post interview with D'Souza. Earlier I cited a D'Souza/Carlson interview, but there seems to be some rift between the two and I'm not sure if that interview actually ever took place, so I might have been the victim of biased liberal news reporting or maybe I just scrambled some stuff in my mind.

I agree. There's no way they found 2000 volunteer mules, which means the mules can be bought. Why not pay mules to recount their story anonymously? It would add a lot to the film.
 
So we were just supposed to sit on the reserve indefinitely??? Did oil prices drop in response to the sale/exchange of SPR stockpiles??? Seems like a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. If he doesn't use the SPR as intended, then oil prices stay high and Biden is the devil for not doing anything about oil prices. If Biden sells/exchanges SPR and the capitalist market we live in takes advantage of that and ships some of it overseas then Biden is a bastard for "selling oil to China." If Biden restricts what the free market does with the oil, then he's a commie or fascist or risks the oil not going to market in which case "you guys" would be laughing at his lack of business acumen.
He could use the strategic reserves to make gas cheaper for americans. Seems kinda obvious.

Option B is don't deplete stategic reserves. Nobody even weighed they were on the table until white horse (armageddon reference!) brought it up. This isn't a strategic problem.
 
Again the nature of the reserves aren't to lower prices, send to other countries, or to turn a profit...they are an emergency stockpile for emergency usage like war or actual shortages (like during the Carter presidency)...crude oil has a very long shelf life...so it wasn't going bad anytime soon...
“SPR oil is sold competitively when the President finds, pursuant to the conditions set forth in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), that a sale is required.”
This was done long before Biden became POTUS.

 
He didn't get us out while he was in office like he promised. He lied and Biden had to get us out of there. That's simple history.

He set a date 4 months into Biden's Presidency. I'm sure Trump had every intention of being around to oversee that particular project to it's end. You're really stretching the truth to get in a shot at Trump; just take a shot at him for things he really did: built the wall, tightened border security, massive deficit spending, fast tracked vaccine, opposed masks/lock down, acted like an a-hole toward our European allies, etc.
 
If (and it's still not the purpose of the reserve) they release oil it should be solely to the benefit of the American people...

That's a platitude that works in some fantasy land ivory tower. Here in the real world, we're a free market economy and rely on corporate capitalists who own our politicians to shuffle our oil around. Furthermore, the US has been net exporter of oil for years now, so why is anybody surprised that we exported oil???
 
Biden at one point said he wouldn't trust the "trump" vaccines...of course he became president tried to take credit for it and mandate it 🤣🤣🤣

Actually that's not what Biden said about the trustworthiness of the vaccines. Have we become so intellectually lazy that we can't/don't/won't fact check something before posting it and embarrassing ourselves.
 
Why wouldn't he make the documentary longer to include the most direct evidence? Why put circumstantial evidence in the movie and exclude direct evidence?
1. It cost a lot to make a movie. The longer it is, the more money.
2. If in the future this goes to court they could say the evidence is not usable in some way because it was in the documentary... or who knows what. It's better if the majority of the evidence/proof is fresh to the courts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,112,294
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top