Winners only.

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You do know that's not Bidens oil to resell to China right?

Whose oil is it?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

‘Russia’s lower house speaker, Vyacheslav Volodin, suggested that Alaska could be targeted by Russia next in a scenario of continued US provocations. He essentially said that Russia could take it back as "Alaska previously belonged to Russia."’

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

'Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Wednesday warned the US against trying to punish Russia for its war in Ukraine, saying that doing so would risk humanity since Moscow has the world’s largest nuclear arsenal.'

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Whose oil is it?

You don’t sell oil to your biggest enemy when world war could break out at any moment. You sure are a genius, brah

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You don’t sell oil to your biggest enemy when world war could break out at any moment. You sure are a genius, brah

That didn’t answer the question. Whose oil is it?
Thx said it wasn’t Biden’s to sell.

And, what is the basis of your claim that China is our biggest enemy, other than personal opinion?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

That didn’t answer the question. Whose oil is it?
Thx said it wasn’t Biden’s to sell.

You’re a f*cking genius; that’s the answer

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You’re a f*cking genius; that’s the answer

You can’t answer the questions?
Not even about the statement YOU made?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

You do know that's not Bidens oil to resell to China right?

Are you saying Biden himself sold the oil? Or did Shell, Exxon, BP, etc ship that oil overseas. I suspect it's the later although you're trying to make it sound like it was the former.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

The strategic oil reserve was never meant to send to other countries...it's a cushion for us in case of war or shortage...it wasnnever meant to be used for any other purpose...considering the fed government doesn't generate money other then taxes from u.s. citizens...it belongs to the u.s. people...we paid for it...

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Why wouldn't he make the documentary longer to include the most direct evidence? Why put circumstantial evidence in the movie and exclude direct evidence?

Excellent question. It's answered in an interview. Basically, he doesn't have the smoking gun. Here's my Reader Digest version based on what I could find. True the Vote (allegedly) gets a whistle blower calling them about this ballot box scam. Unfortunately, the whistle blower won't come forth, so he could be a GOP plant, a fictitious character or the real deal.

True the Vote then acquires geolocations of cell phones in areas of question and isolates cell phones that were in the area of 10+ ballot boxes. However, this is where it gets a little "grey" if you will. True the Vote used a 100 ft geofence and the geolocating was only accurate to within 30 feet, so I think what we really have is not people visiting 10+ ballot boxes but people that were within 130ft of 10+ ballot boxes. Being within 130 feet of 10+ ballot boxes is certainly a red flag and worth looking into.

However, that brings up some more issues. The majority of the boxes were at libraries, so could this be people who work for the library system, maybe a delivery guy who delivers to the libraries, etc. Could have been the guy in charge of picking up the ballots. I doubt that would account for 2000 people, but I wouldn't be surprised if it accounted for big chunk of that 2000; maybe there were mules, but only 1000 of them.

So this is where the video surveillance comes in. They have videos of individuals dropping off ballot(s) at a ballot box that they claim time corresponds to the geolocation of a mule. However, the alleged mule could be 130 feet away. As far as I can tell True the Vote hasn't released the geolocation data they have, although they've shared it with local authorities who've declined to follow-up.

So that's a considerable amount of "fishiness" for sure. But what I also find pretty fishy is that we have 2000 (alleged) mules at 10+ ballot boxes, but a not single one of them is caught on camera a second time. The other thing that strikes me as fishy is it's a huge operation to harvest the hundreds of thousands maybe ~million ballots to pull this off. Plus all the forgers you would need. So hundreds of thousands of people have kept quiet about this operation; that strikes me as highly unlikely. Furthermore, the checks and balances they have in place are good at filtering out multiple votes, dead voters, etc. So even if you crammed 1m fake votes into the system how many would actually end up getting toward Biden? And who is to say that some of these alleged mules weren't GOP operatives either attempting to sow distrust or stuffing the ballot box for Trump?

Here's where I distilled most of the information from. It's a Wash Post interview with D'Souza. Earlier I cited a D'Souza/Carlson interview, but there seems to be some rift between the two and I'm not sure if that interview actually ever took place, so I might have been the victim of biased liberal news reporting or maybe I just scrambled some stuff in my mind.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/17/discussing-gaps-2000-mules-with-dinesh-dsouza/

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The people who got all the data said there is video and geotracking of these individuals going to multiple boxes... Only some video and data is shared in the alloted time of the documentary. The information they got can also be had by you or me. You can request the ballot box videos, you can purchase the geotracking data.

FYI, I owned a small business and I looked into purchasing geotracking data; it ain't cheap.

So is it your position that although D'Souza has video of people making multiple drops he decided to leave the smoking gun out of his documentary? In Bowling for Columbine, Michael Moore says a bank is giving away free guns when you open an account. Even had a video of him in the bank's parking lot with his new gun. Doesn't mean he wasn't full of s h i t.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The strategic oil reserve was never meant to send to other countries...it's a cushion for us in case of war or shortage...it wasnnever meant to be used for any other purpose...considering the fed government doesn't generate money other then taxes from u.s. citizens...it belongs to the u.s. people...we paid for it...

So you're saying Biden sold our oil at historically high prices??? Did that money go back into the treasury/budget? Or did he just give them the oil, like a good will gesture...

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

It wouldn't matter if it was sold at a profit...that isn't what the strategic reserve is for...

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

You don’t sell oil to your biggest enemy when world war could break out at any moment. You sure are a genius, brah

You do know that's not Bidens oil to resell to China right?

I'm pretty sure the way it works is we wholesale the oil on the market and then if the company buying it wants to ship it to Italy that's where it goes. It's not like Biden called up Xi and asked him it he'd like to buy 12 million barrels of oil...