Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ahh, the Google. That historic compendium of factual info.
Hahahahahhaha.
So you think court records are bullshlt and the story of Noah is real history?
Humanity started with god moulding man from clay and woman from man’s rib?
God is omnipotent and flawless but got the Old Testament wrong and made corrections with the New Testament?

Good stuff.
 
So you think court records are bullshlt and the story of Noah is real history?
Humanity started with god moulding man from clay and woman from man’s rib?
God is omnipotent and flawless but got the Old Testament wrong and made corrections with the New Testament?

Good stuff.
I am not religious.

I was speaking on the duality of the Bible and Google. Sorry, I thought it was obvious. Just because you may or may not believe in God or religion doesn't mean you should give people shit about it either way. Did you eat paint chips as a kid or something or were you molested by a babysitter? You got way too much to prove for some reason.
 
I am not religious.

I was speaking on the duality of the Bible and Google. Sorry, I thought it was obvious. Just because you may or may not believe in God or religion doesn't mean you should give people shit about it either way. Did you eat paint chips as a kid or something or were you molested by a babysitter? You got way too much to prove for some reason.
The duality of the Bible and Google? Love to hear more on that, but when a conspiracy fantasist quotes biblical passage, how can you NOT say the Bible is a bunch of made-up folk tales?
And then YOU come along and insinuate that legal documents and other published works are BS. It’s too rich.
 
The duality of the Bible and Google? Love to hear more on that, but when a conspiracy fantasist quotes biblical passage, how can you NOT say the Bible is a bunch of made-up folk tales?
And then YOU come along and insinuate that legal documents and other published works are BS. It’s too rich.

You don’t even know what the Bible is or how young it is relative to the source material it comes from. Does your red nose queef when you squeeze it?
 
The Bible was edited and redacted 2000 years ago by the council of Nicaea. Google has a council of Nicaea also who edits and redacts information. A power hungry group of humans deciding what information people can know or not know is a power play in any century.
 
The duality of the Bible and Google? Love to hear more on that, but when a conspiracy fantasist quotes biblical passage, how can you NOT say the Bible is a bunch of made-up folk tales?
And then YOU come along and insinuate that legal documents and other published works are BS. It’s too rich.
The Bible IS a bunch of stories told from many points of view and many people. As is Google. I never even had a thought about "legal documents" however, what it sounds like is you were fishing around for someone to argue about legal documents.
 
You don’t even know what the Bible is or how young it is relative to the source material it comes from. Does your red nose queef when you squeeze it?
“Source material”? As in “folk tales”?
I know plenty about the Bible and the wealth of contradiction within its various stories written over centuries by varying authors.

It couldn’t be any further from a historical document, and any priest who is not a liar will tell you it’s fable and not fact.
 
The Bible IS a bunch of stories told from many points of view and many people. As is Google. I never even had a thought about "legal documents" however, what it sounds like is you were fishing around for someone to argue about legal documents.
When I provide evidence to back up what I say, it’s not a link to a conspiracy website or an op/Ed piece in some obscure newspaper. It’s things like stock market figures, .gov websites that show statistics on the economy, medical journals, etc.

Why people think that accessing the info via the internet instead of a library is a bad thing is beyond me. Maybe they are luddites? Yet, here they are on an internet Car Audio forum.
Weird dichotomy.
 
When I provide evidence to back up what I say, it’s not a link to a conspiracy website or an op/Ed piece in some obscure newspaper. It’s things like stock market figures, .gov websites that show statistics on the economy, medical journals, etc.

Why people think that accessing the info via the internet instead of a library is a bad thing is beyond me. Maybe they are luddites? Yet, here they are on an internet Car Audio forum.
Weird dichotomy.
Nobody is saying you can't get factual information from Google.
 
“Source material”? As in “folk tales”?
I know plenty about the Bible and the wealth of contradiction within its various stories written over centuries by varying authors.

Orly? You don’t know about 1000’s of years before the Bible ever was a concept?

What do these say?

C8854953-87FD-472C-9996-C14FC4776442.jpeg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,095,435
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260513_214311575.jpg

ThxOne

    May 13, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260513_213956814.jpg

ThxOne

    May 13, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top