Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yep. Keep trying to divert attention from the fact that you are nowhere in life, are a latent homosexual ********* who apparently is into children, and whose education seems to have ended in the 3rd grade.

You are a wannabe who insists he is a somebody. Those are the worst kinds of wannabes.
If by “game” , you mean arguing facts against your pretense of knowledge, then my game is stellar. I have wiped the floor with your dirty *** every time you have tried to play. And I can prove it.

If you want to keep playing, I’m game. But…put some effort into it. Claiming yourself a “winner simply because you filibustered long enough for people to forget you failed is NOT “winning”. At least not got people who can remember farther back than 30 seconds.

How about you finally tell us how gas prices rose due to panic-buying of TP BEGORE anyone ever mentioned a shortage?
Or maybe how the commodities markets that I trade in have nothing to do with gas prices?
You just did it again. I just told you to be original and you are again trying to spit the same shlt back at me that I said to you. You're a joke. You can't just reword my insults.

Also... how can I be both a homosexual and a *********? How can one love blowing dudes and be afraid of blowing dudes at the same time? How does telling the forum that you are a ********* because you go out of your way to play with other peoples kids mean that I am into kids? We are all going to need your proof that these things are possible with verifiable and undisputed facts. Otherwise, you are nothing more than a closet Trump supporter :unsure:
 
People have a right to defend the destruction of their property. There will be push back, some day. The ones in America with the real strength know their real strength, and with wisdom, they withhold their real strength in fear of how powerful it is. Someday people are going to have enough. I just don't get why people want this ugliness in our world. Only losers try to destroy stuff.
 
Once again, if the media didn't make this a thing, then it wouldn't be a thing. Nothing unprecedented has happened here. There's dozens of people killed in America's cities somewhat in mass, at a very high rate, and nobody says a word about that. Every week there's some like 7 year old that's shot in the head by gang violence. It'll make local news. Where are all you virtue signalers at when it comes to gun laws and protecting the actual innocent in the most violent areas? This sh*t is ridiculous. Let's not stop city violence, and then hate people who are defending themselves and property due to nobody stopping the city violence. That's a huge part what you pay so much ridiculous taxes for is police protection across the community. If police can't or aren't going to protect the city, and individuals can't protect the city, then it's about time for a civil war. You leave no other options on the table with the argument of no police + no right to self defense. Is that what you want, a war? That's what this will lead to if people keep pushing this BS narrative about how life actually works.
I can't believe that you haven't said that it was all a diversion to keep people away from the Maxwell trial. I'd make a better "Buck" than you. 🤣
 
People have a right to defend the destruction of their property. There will be push back, some day. The ones in America with the real strength know their real strength, and with wisdom, they withhold their real strength in fear of how powerful it is. Someday people are going to have enough. I just don't get why people want this ugliness in our world. Only losers try to destroy stuff.
You're not that guy pal. You're not that guy.
 
I can't believe that you haven't said that it was all a diversion to keep people away from the Maxwell trial. I'd make a better "Buck" than you. 🤣
You're not that guy pal. You're not that guy.


Well, cool story, but I'm not sure what any of that has to do with anything.



Well, the left is having trouble capitalizing on the Rittenhouse trial. A white dude defended himself against white dudes and somehow the clowns brought racism in. It worries me that it seems like people are stupid enough to actually believe stuff like that. People who prioritize their thoughts on events based off race are racists, which is a lot of the left, and probably a good bit of the right, too. The left is just a little more open about it, they just hide it with gov benefits.

So, if burning a building is a peaceful protest, then shooting in self defense is just playing a friendly game of tag. Because that's how stupid everything is. It seems like reality is being forced into two sides, and it's constructed to make us war with each other. I'm not in either side, because it makes you retarded, literally.
 
That’s what you’re standing on. Lol. The rioters were ok to be there but a Kyle Rittenhouse couldn’t be. Maybe someone should tell you where you can be and where you can’t. What a waste of time talking to you about this has been. I’m done.

He's a fukking Jr. in High School trying to play cop with a gun that was bought illegally. If that is who you want policing our streets then good luck. The kid got acquitted because somebody paid for his defense, he's white, had an all white jury (except one) and a Republican judge. I watched the videos and have no problem with shootings #2 and #3. #1 is a different story. Good luck with your High School Police force.
 
Well, cool story, but I'm not sure what any of that has to do with anything.



Well, the left is having trouble capitalizing on the Rittenhouse trial. A white dude defended himself against white dudes and somehow the clowns brought racism in. It worries me that it seems like people are stupid enough to actually believe stuff like that. People who prioritize their thoughts on events based off race are racists, which is a lot of the left, and probably a good bit of the right, too. The left is just a little more open about it, they just hide it with gov benefits.

So, if burning a building is a peaceful protest, then shooting in self defense is just playing a friendly game of tag. Because that's how stupid everything is. It seems like reality is being forced into two sides, and it's constructed to make us war with each other. I'm not in either side, because it makes you retarded, literally.

I'm guessing that the white supremacists, racists, and neo Nazi's voted for Trump. Even you know that. Don't be naive Bucko. The kid got acquitted because somebody paid big money for his defense and he's white. 💯 fact.
 
Here's one for the folks saying that if Rittenhouse was black he would of been found guilty.

"Jury acquits (black) Gifford man who claimed self-defense after girlfriend killed by sheriff's SWAT team in 2017 raid"


That fukking guy served 4-½ years in jail that he will never get back. The Cops shot his girlfriend 10 times while she was in bed. He got screwed and lost his girlfriend. That case has no resemblance to the Rittenhouse Privilege case. Nice try though. I respect the effort.
 
See, politicians pay people to organize these riots, so that every jury in every city will be in fear if they don’t judge people in court by the way the people threatening riots want them to.

https://www.rt.com/usa/540838-rittenhouse-protests-riot-police/

This is politicians and possibly federal law enforcement and intel agencies threatening every jury and city in America. They help orchestrate this stuff, and a lot of it is done on the Internet. The message is: Screw your laws. If you don’t convict the people we want convicted and free those we don’t, then we’re going to come burn your f*cking city down. That’s real, and thats terrifying to think if you get called to jury duty, then your decision as a juror could directly lead or not-lead to a riot immediately after your decision.

Nothing to see here, move along.
 
"referring to memes as a source of info in an argument or debate might be a REALLY poor idea if actual news outlets are considered a bad option"

You say that as if those aren't actual quotes from those people, rather than just some sarcastic meme creator. You continue to read between the lines of Trump specifically saying to protest "peacefully" while not holding any of those dems responsible for their incendiary words that they didn't even bother to try and couch as "peaceful". I called it a meme because it was structured that way, but those were actual quotes, and I dont see you bashing them for it other than a vague claim you don't condone any illegal activity. Are you calling Pelosi an insurrectionist for calling for "uprisings" in the streets? How more close to insurrection do dems need to tiptoe than saying "uprisings" before you get off your high horse?

Let me guess, you will say "bad democrats" as a slap on this wrist only because I put their quotes in your face, and then go back to bashing Trump for telling his supporters to protest peacefully. I wont take the left serious until I start seeing them police their own side without urges to do so from the right. Otherwise it's nothing more than morality if and only when it supports you looking moral, not when it's the right thing to do.
Can you provide a list of quotes (and who said them) of Democrats saying the vote was stolen and people must fight like hell to stop the steal?
I’m interested in any and all Democrats who may have pushed the idea of insurrection and an attempted coup at the Capitol.

You keep saying Trump said to protest peacefully should be taken literally. If so, you can’t deny he’s an idiot if he thought a peaceful protest at the Capitol was going to prevent the electoral college vote from happening.
Only a farking moron would think those involved in the vote would say “hey, they’re wearing hats and waving flags out there; maybe we should reconsider this whole process”.
*I* think Trump is a farking moron, but it’s interesting when one of his followers paints him as one too.

The meme thing was more a general statement about memes being used as if they are researched data points. Plenty of voices here against left AND right media, but anyone using a meme that is patently false to support an argument is just a facking moron.
 
You just did it again. I just told you to be original and you are again trying to spit the same shlt back at me that I said to you. You're a joke. You can't just reword my insults.

Also... how can I be both a homosexual and a *********? How can one love blowing dudes and be afraid of blowing dudes at the same time? How does telling the forum that you are a ********* because you go out of your way to play with other peoples kids mean that I am into kids? We are all going to need your proof that these things are possible with verifiable and undisputed facts. Otherwise, you are nothing more than a closet Trump supporter :unsure:
I already explained your duality, but I’ll do it again. Yes, just like one dictionary can be the top-dog, a ********* can be a homosexual: “Homophobes should consider a little self-reflection, suggests a new study finding those individuals who are most hostile toward gays and hold strong anti-gay views may themselves have same-*** desires, albeit undercover ones.”
“People in denial about their own ****** orientation, perhaps a denial fostered by authoritarian and ********** parents, may feel a threat from other gay and lesbian individuals. Lashing out may ultimately be an indicator of the person's own internal conflict with ****** orientation”. This is based on four different studies.
People are capable of self-hate. A homosexual can hate that they are homosexual and take that hatred out on other homosexuals.

Instead of telling us the studies and the doctors behind them are wrong, give us your medical and education credentials. Then, write a retort, have it peer-reviewed, and submit it to AJP. Then get DSM5 updated. They’ll need your datasets.

What is it that makes you think of *** when you hear about adults coaching kids? You think every teacher is a *********? Every parent? Every priest? Did you have an episode and therefore think that represents “life”? Did you foment an episode and assume every other adult is like you?
What is the sudden obsession?
Was it because Buckaroo accused Biden of it and you learned a new word?
 
I'm guessing that the white supremacists, racists, and neo Nazi's voted for Trump. Even you know that. Don't be naive Bucko. The kid got acquitted because somebody paid big money for his defense and he's white. 💯 fact.
You’re a hateful person. . If it’s that easy for social media to make you hate others, I don’t want to have a thing to do with you in real life now. Maybe you’re not the snitch you appear to be on the internet, but I wouldn’t take that chance with my real life. It’s too easy to get you to hate other people. You didn’t even watch the case but you know what happened because someone is white. Black people don’t need you to be a racist to help their cause. They could use you being informed, but as everyone here can see, you won’t put in the work to be informed. You’re a lazy liberal who pretends to be outraged because you think it’s cool. Black people deserve more then just being placated by you acting like you actually care. The appearance that you care is more important than actually caring. You’re a social media **** without any deep knowledge of the issues.
 
Last edited:
Just look at the pathetic liberals on this site. You have Bobby, who insists on having an opinion without knowing anything. You have slo-ride, who is actually a decent internet troll but with zero substance. Then Rob, who writes paragraphs of his manifesto on a car audio site that people don’t even waste the time to read before just responding to him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,107,322
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top