Winners only.

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Read it however you like. You're going to anyway. How many looters and rioters that helped burn down our cities have come forward and said... "I'm sorry?" Exactly.

YOU think the list are facts. Prove it. It's my OPINION that the list is biased. Disprove my opinion. I will save you the time since you won't comprehend what I just said. It is my OPINION and therefore is not subject for disproval.

Stop tap-dancing away from the question. The 30,000+ lies that Trump told us has nothing to do with whether the looters and rioters were remorseful (though again, I'll guarantee that every one who went to court over it was "remorseful" - just like the insurrectionists).

So, what is "biased" about quotes of lies that Trump told us? Are we supposed to forget all his words? is it "biased" that his words were recorded for posterity? Is it "baised" that someone knows the truth and can prove he lied? Is it "biased" that someone made a list regarding the most dishonest POTUS in history but doesn't compile a list of lies any lies that anyone else in government has told?
Or, did you not really mean "biased" when you said it, simply used the wrong word, and are now upset that your words are taken literally instead of us trying to figure out what you MIGHT mean (which is different from your words)?

Failure to answer yet another question that is posed directly to you about a statement you have made only reduces any shred of credibility you may have in future discussion.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Stop tap-dancing away from the question. The 30,000+ lies that Trump told us has nothing to do with whether the looters and rioters were remorseful (though again, I'll guarantee that every one who went to court over it was "remorseful" - just like the insurrectionists).

So, what is "biased" about quotes of lies that Trump told us? Are we supposed to forget all his words? is it "biased" that his words were recorded for posterity? Is it "baised" that someone knows the truth and can prove he lied? Is it "biased" that someone made a list regarding the most dishonest POTUS in history but doesn't compile a list of lies any lies that anyone else in government has told?
Or, did you not really mean "biased" when you said it, simply used the wrong word, and are now upset that your words are taken literally instead of us trying to figure out what you MIGHT mean (which is different from your words)?

Failure to answer yet another question that is posed directly to you about a statement you have made only reduces any shred of credibility you may have in future discussion.

If you didn't learn comprehension in school, what makes you think I can magically make you smarter? I could explain things to you until I am blue in the face and you either will not get it or will out right ignore it. I am not wasting my time talking to a biased brick wall. You figure it out.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

If you didn't learn comprehension in school, what makes you think I can magically make you smarter? I could explain things to you until I am blue in the face and you either will not get it or will out right ignore it. I am not wasting my time talking to a biased brick wall. You figure it out.

And there you have it. Like you are following a playbook.

You say a lot but when you are challenged on what you say, you turn to a strawmen, ad hominem, ad verecundiam, obfuscation, slippery slope arguments, false dilemmas, and just about any other way to avoid answering the challenge.
(I'll provide definitions of all those terms and examples of when you did them if needed)

You have done this with every (or almost every) challenge that has been posed of you. The rare times you actually "answered" the challenge, was to say that you were right because you KNOW it, and facts are wrong.
I'm sure you didn't watch the video that explains two different types of people debating, but the video describes one type as just like you are here. It's an interesting little clip that was shared, and you really should watch it, if for no other reason than to learn something new.

So, how about answering the question as to how a list of quoted lies spoken by Trump is "biased"?
"biased-unfairly prejudiced for or against someone or something"

What is unfair about quoting a lie, and making a list of quoted lies made by a President?
Is it unfair to demand a POTUS be honest?
Is it unfair to point out when a POTUS lies to t he public an average of 14x a day while in office? Is it unfair that his words are part of the national archive?

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

hahahaha @ msnbc for getting banned from court room on Rittenhouse trial

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

hahahaha @ msnbc for getting banned from court room on Rittenhouse trial

That is interesting. Did the journalist break a law other than running the red light?

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

Dont know and dont care...but im sure you will write a novel explaining it all to us

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Dont know and dont care...but im sure you will write a novel explaining it all to us

Then why'd you post it? Expecting a high-five or a backslap?

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

Just stirring the pot....it seemed to work, you responded like always...LOL, now go back to the shadows and wait for the next political statement to argue with. Extreme leftists are so predictable

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

My body doesn’t have to make sense to anyone else. It’s mine. You were really easily convinced to dislike and fear your fellow citizen based on their vaccine status. I’m not afraid of you Bobby, even if you may carry around some germs. I’ve lived with germs my whole life. Your vaccine status wouldn’t even enter my mind if I were to meet you in real life. I don’t want to live in a world where we are convinced to fear our own neighbors and countrymen. If I drove up to Vegas in December for an audio show, are you going to act like this when I get there? I’ll probably just stay anonymous because of all the shit you’ve said on this forum. Meeting new friends or acquaintances in real life is going to get super weird, and it won’t be the whacko anti-vax crowd that makes it that way.

I don't care if you get the vaccine or not. Just realize that you might lose some privileges because you aren't vaccinated. I'm probably going to compete again up here in Vegas after doing some testing earlier this week.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Just stirring the pot....it seemed to work, you responded like always...LOL, now go back to the shadows and wait for the next political statement to argue with. Extreme leftists are so predictable

You are surprised? Isn't that what a discussion forum/thread is for?
It'd be kind of weird if people just posted here and then no one responded to the posts, no?

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

Lol....never said i was surprised (original statement was purposely posted just to piss you off), you just cant resist can ya

 

[hispls 5,000+ posts]

Science can be really amazing.

Post up some of the randomized control trials demonstrating of any of this shit you've just claimed. I'm guessing you don't mean actual science applying the scientific method but just big pharma press releases and the opinions of those you consider authority figures.

How many boosters have you had so far? How many do you plan to have to take in the future? At any point will you object to your immune system being turned into a subscription service by multinational corporations and their politician prostitutes?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

And there you have it. Like you are following a playbook.

You say a lot but when you are challenged on what you say, you turn to a strawmen, ad hominem, ad verecundiam, obfuscation, slippery slope arguments, false dilemmas, and just about any other way to avoid answering the challenge.
(I'll provide definitions of all those terms and examples of when you did them if needed)

You have done this with every (or almost every) challenge that has been posed of you. The rare times you actually "answered" the challenge, was to say that you were right because you KNOW it, and facts are wrong.
I'm sure you didn't watch the video that explains two different types of people debating, but the video describes one type as just like you are here. It's an interesting little clip that was shared, and you really should watch it, if for no other reason than to learn something new.

So, how about answering the question as to how a list of quoted lies spoken by Trump is "biased"?
"biased-unfairly prejudiced for or against someone or something"

What is unfair about quoting a lie, and making a list of quoted lies made by a President?
Is it unfair to demand a POTUS be honest?
Is it unfair to point out when a POTUS lies to t he public an average of 14x a day while in office? Is it unfair that his words are part of the national archive?

Right back at you. You don't get the responses you are programmed to get and you spew a bunch of verbal diahrea.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

And there you have it. Like you are following a playbook.

You say a lot but when you are challenged on what you say, you turn to a strawmen, ad hominem, ad verecundiam, obfuscation, slippery slope arguments, false dilemmas, and just about any other way to avoid answering the challenge.
(I'll provide definitions of all those terms and examples of when you did them if needed)

You have done this with every (or almost every) challenge that has been posed of you. The rare times you actually "answered" the challenge, was to say that you were right because you KNOW it, and facts are wrong.
I'm sure you didn't watch the video that explains two different types of people debating, but the video describes one type as just like you are here. It's an interesting little clip that was shared, and you really should watch it, if for no other reason than to learn something new.

So, how about answering the question as to how a list of quoted lies spoken by Trump is "biased"?
"biased-unfairly prejudiced for or against someone or something"

What is unfair about quoting a lie, and making a list of quoted lies made by a President?
Is it unfair to demand a POTUS be honest?
Is it unfair to point out when a POTUS lies to t he public an average of 14x a day while in office? Is it unfair that his words are part of the national archive?

You sure do put a lot of effort into bashing a guy who is no longer president but no effort in calling out all the wrongs the current administration is doing. Like I said, a biased brick wall.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Post up some of the randomized control trials demonstrating of any of this shit you've just claimed. I'm guessing you don't mean actual science applying the scientific method but just big pharma press releases and the opinions of those you consider authority figures.

How many boosters have you had so far? How many do you plan to have to take in the future? At any point will you object to your immune system being turned into a subscription service by multinational corporations and their politician prostitutes?

Control trials for the vax? Or trials that show the hospitals and frontline workers are reporting the truth? Trials that show that other vaccines worked?

I have had no boosters as I was not eligible the last time I looked (several weeks ago). I will take what is necessary, just like was done for any other vaccine I have taken.

Please explain your "subscription service" theory. Is this a science-based concept, or a talking point?
Have you ever taken a pain med for a headache or body ache? Did that med cure you of every future pain, or did you ever have pain again? Why might that be?
Have you ever lifted weights to build muscle? Did you find that you lost the muscle when you stopped lifting? Why might that be?

Did you know that other vaccines require boosters? This is no the only one? I'm guessing not, based on your "subscription" idea, used as a way to say the vaccine is a bad thing.