So, your context is that you feel the list (the one that you feel doesn’t exist in the first place) is bogus.
You won’t accept a random sampling of the lies with verification, you want all 20,000+ lies listed and then proved that he said them.
Because even if a random sampling is shown to be correct, the entire list is bogus without proof of every example.
Good logic there.
Still not willing to meet on the middle and do a random sample? I’m confident you’d say anything I provided is bullshlt, yet you will not do your own verification.
That’s a pretty easy out when you think about it. Kind of a “heads I win, tails you lose” situation.
There is a 13.7mb cab file of the whole thing. Would you even look at it, or still insist that no such list exists?
Here is an interesting watch about a 9/11 lie he made. It includes audio of him speaking the lie. He was “there when it happened”, though there is no evidence and no witnesses. He lost “hundreds” ( or at least “many”) friends that day.
This link offers some insight about his heroic work at ground zero the following days. Though there is no record of it:
Anyone remember his claims of people celebrating in the streets that day? Yeah, I do.
How about all those claims of the best economy In history that were complete lies?
Don’t give me your lame excuse that we “should know” what his words actually mean. That bullshlt doesn’t cut it with me, especially not from a POTUS.