Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes. But to claim that less growth is better than more growth is a bit disingenuous.
"It was better under Trump, even though the numbers don't reflect it. I'd rather see 5% growth than 8%". Odd way to see things.
Kind of like people who wouldn't pay more for a 1/3 lb burger than a 1/4 lb "because 3 is smaller" (yep, it happened).
Turn it up to 11...
Thst doesn't make any sense. Stimulus packages are still trickle down economics. The richest organizations get most of the money, then that trickles jobs down to us. Tax breaks and stimulus work the same way, only stimulus allows you to pick which industries/,companies get the money. Even an oligarchy is trickle down economics.
 


FBF3C507-9ED6-43E1-AA4A-4F8699E7FD2C.png
 
Thst doesn't make any sense. Stimulus packages are still trickle down economics. The richest organizations get most of the money, then that trickles jobs down to us. Tax breaks and stimulus work the same way, only stimulus allows you to pick which industries/,companies get the money. Even an oligarchy is trickle down economics.
Trickle down is giving to the businesses and the wealthiest in the hopes it will benefit those below. It has not worked historically.
Literally the name of an economic theory.

Stimulus gives to the “below” in order to more directly benefit them and the economy overall. It has worked historically.

Not the same thing at all.

Not really
 
Trickle down is giving to the businesses and the wealthiest in the hopes it will benefit those below. It has not worked historically.
Literally the name of an economic theory.

Stimulus gives to the “below” in order to more directly benefit them and the economy overall. It has worked historically.

Not the same thing at all.

Not really
Stimulus isnt all given at the bottom. As a matter of fact, most of the stimulus under Biden went to government agencies and corporations. The last stimulus that was only given to the bottom up was the $700 billion George W Bush stimulus after 911. Direct stimulus payments only account for 800 billion of the 5 trillion in Covid relief, and unemployment payments were around 1 trillion. That’s less than half. I do think we needed stimulus after the lock downs, but you are just making up your own set of facts.
 
Depends on what markers you consider for economic benefit...lower operating costs from tax breaks and most businesses will create more jobs which benefits the "below"

Stimulus (when directed at the "below") pretty much just gives the "below" more spending money which honestly only benefits them in the short term and has a side effect of increasing the costs of goods and services...
 
Stimulus isnt all given at the bottom. As a matter of fact, most of the stimulus under Biden went to government agencies and corporations. The last stimulus that was only given to the bottom up was the $700 billion George W Bush stimulus after 911. Direct stimulus payments only account for 800 billion of the 5 trillion in Covid relief, and unemployment payments were around 1 trillion. That’s less than half. I do think we needed stimulus after the lock downs, but you are just making up your own set of facts.
I’m no economist. I leave it to the pros to figure it all out. I guess they’ve been getting it wrong all along?
 
Depends on what markers you consider for economic benefit...lower operating costs from tax breaks and most businesses will create more jobs which benefits the "below"

Stimulus (when directed at the "below") pretty much just gives the "below" more spending money which honestly only benefits them in the short term and has a side effect of increasing the costs of goods and services...
The trickledown is supposed to do that, but it historically hasn’t worked.
 
The fact you loved a twice-impeached *** offender as your POTUS speaks volumes about you.

“Conservative party has been silenced”. By WHO?

the impeachments really mean absolutely nothing at all and were completely partisan

NOBODY CARES about the impeachment except for trump haters


Yes. But to claim that less growth is better than more growth is a bit disingenuous.
"It was better under Trump, even though the numbers don't reflect it. I'd rather see 5% growth than 8%". Odd way to see things.
Kind of like people who wouldn't pay more for a 1/3 lb burger than a 1/4 lb "because 3 is smaller" (yep, it happened).
Turn it up to 11...

growth is a lot easier to achieve depending on the current landscape

there are a lot of factors that play into it. The amount of growth was perfectly acceptable under Trump.
 
the impeachments really mean absolutely nothing at all and were completely partisan

NOBODY CARES about the impeachment except for trump haters

growth is a lot easier to achieve depending on the current landscape

there are a lot of factors that play into it. The amount of growth was perfectly acceptable under Trump.

Wow. Your head is buried in the sand or up Trump's butt.
Which is it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,105,954
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top