Winners only.

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

CCP Seeks New Global Order at ‘Expense of All Others’: US Admiral

m.theepochtimes.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I hear ya... so quote where I said I know the definition of Ironic better than the OED. Go ahead, do that now. Exactly, stfu idiot. I said YOU used it wrong yet again. Are you the OED?

You have "quoted" me before and added your own phrasing, words or other to it, claiming it was what I said. That is not quoting someone. Eat........some..........Diiicccckkkkksssss!

My definition was taken from the OED. You said it was incorrect. Ergo, you are saying the OED is incorrect. Not the first time you’ve done so, either.

“Eat….some….diiiiccckkks” Quite the strong argument you’ve got there. I guess I can’t expect much more from someone with an IQ as low as yours.

Was this just some more of your whimsical metaphor?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Where is the rest of the quote? Or are you just going to post part of a quote... ya know, out of context.

Dummy, a quote doesn’t require ever single word that was ever written.
Do you think when a newspaper quotes a speech, they put the entire speech in the article?
What planet do you live on? Did you ever actually attend school?

Did you post those words, or didn’t you?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Dummy, a quote doesn’t require ever single word that was ever written.
Do you think when a newspaper quotes a speech, they put the entire speech in the article?
What planet do you live on? Did you ever actually attend school?

Did you post those words, or didn’t you?

In some order I am sure and with context. Your quote means nothing without context. All you are doing is searching for a specific response from people by quoting shit with no context. I'd expect nothing less from a turd like you.

As for the irony. You may have had the definition right in front of you but your example missed its mark by a long shot. Eat a diick.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I bet when Rob eats Vienna Sausages, he puts the whole can in his mouth at once.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

In some order I am sure and with context. Your quote means nothing without context. All you are doing is searching for a specific response from people by quoting shit with no context. I'd expect nothing less from a turd like you.

As for the irony. You may have had the definition right in front of you but your example missed its mark by a long shot. Eat a diick.

Nice try. What “context” is missing that would change the meaning of the quote as I referenced it? None, because it is a standalone thought. Is English your first language?
If so, you should know the rules a lot better.

My example was dead on. The guy who actually commits an act while accusing others of committing it (when they aren’t).
Ironic.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I bet when Rob eats Vienna Sausages, he puts the whole can in his mouth at once.

Did you stay up all night thinking of that one, or did your mom write it for you?

Maybe spend less time thinking about my mouth, and more time learning how to design a sub box.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Very very bad news, this is world war

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Nice try. What “context” is missing that would change the meaning of the quote as I referenced it? None, because it is a standalone thought. Is English your first language?
If so, you should know the rules a lot better.

My example was dead on. The guy who actually commits an act while accusing others of committing it (when they aren’t).
Ironic.

That is not ironic.

"happening in the opposite way to what is expected, and typically causing wry amusement because of this." - Ironic.

What you are siting is hypocrisy... something you practice well.

Is American English YOUR first language?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Nice try. What “context” is missing that would change the meaning of the quote as I referenced it? None, because it is a standalone thought. Is English your first language?
If so, you should know the rules a lot better.

My example was dead on. The guy who actually commits an act while accusing others of committing it (when they aren’t).
Ironic.

What "context" is missing? Well, the context you left out on purpose. Duh. I know, you didn't get it, probably why you left it out. You didn't think it was needed since you didn't know what the context was. I understand bruh. It's hard for some people.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

That is not ironic.

"happening in the opposite way to what is expected, and typically causing wry amusement because of this." - Ironic.

What you are siting is hypocrisy... something you practice well.

Is American English YOUR first language?

What you do is the opposite of what SHOULD be. You accuse others of doing what YOU are doing

Like a preacher screaming about *** being dirty, and then it’s discovered he’s paying hookers to do things while he hides in a closet and watches.
HE is a hypocrite. Watching and whacking is hypocritical. His screaming at others for doing what he himself is doing, is ironic.

It’s really a good idea for you to learn the language if you think you’re going to school me on it.
You failed again. Even if you claim a hundred times you are right, doesn’t make it so.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What "context" is missing? Well, the context you left out on purpose. Duh. I know, you didn't get it, probably why you left it out. You didn't think it was needed since you didn't know what the context was. I understand bruh. It's hard for some people.

Gas had no problem staying under $2 was your claim.
None of your context within the post could change the meaning of that phrase in any way. Including every word you typed in the quote does not change the meaning of those words in any way.
If you feel the lack of context changes the meaning, then tell us what you DID mean by the price having “no problem staying under $2” during Trump.
Were you being metaphorical?
Was it facetious, because it was bullshlt?
Were you quoting someone else but forgot the quotation marks?
What was your intended meaning of that phrase?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

What you do is the opposite of what SHOULD be. You accuse others of doing what YOU are doing

Like a preacher screaming about *** being dirty, and then it’s discovered he’s paying hookers to do things while he hides in a closet and watches.
HE is a hypocrite. Watching and whacking is hypocritical. His screaming at others for doing what he himself is doing, is ironic.

It’s really a good idea for you to learn the language if you think you’re going to school me on it.
You failed again. Even if you claim a hundred times you are right, doesn’t make it so.

Wow... sorry pal, but you are wrong. Before you continue, go speak to an English Professor please.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Gas had no problem staying under $2 was your claim.
None your context could change the meaning g if that phrase in any way. Including every word you typed does not change the meaning of those words in any way.
If you feel the lack of context changes the meaning, then tell us what you DID mean by the price having no problem staying under $2 during Trump.
Were you being metaphorical?
Was it facetious, because it was bullshlt?
Were you quoting someone else but forgot the quotation marks?
What was your intended meaning?

Hey, don't you get tired of not understanding people?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Hey, don't you get tired of not understanding people?

Don’t you get tired of being the poster boy for the Dunning-Kruger effect?