Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
For all the talk about "them" ******** Trump with these court cases, doesn't the timing of the Georgia case seem to benefit Trump? March 4th start date, the day before the big multi-state primary. The media and Trump can spin the case for months to support his stolen election narrative for months. Seems like this is nothing but free press for Trump right in the thick of the primaries and totally plays into the "stolen election/deep state" narrative regardless of outcome.

Any exposure is good exposure, right?

lol
 
Last edited:
Any exposure is good exposure, right?

lol
In this case it's not "any exposure." As long as the trial goes, the right wing media, memeanators, social media "pundits," etc will spin any and everything they can as proof the election was stolen. It's not just a case of "there is no such thing as bad PR," in this case the PR will literally be falling into the Trump campaign's stolen election narrative, which is ~50% of the GOP platform at this time.

IMHO, the Georgia AG is giving TrumpCO the platform he wants (and needs?) and the timing is near perfect for the Trump campaign. All the little guys will blow their campaign treasure chests in February trying to get in front of or at least stay close to Trump. When March roles around and their campaign coffers are empty and Trump's are still full, it'll be nothing but Trump, Trump, Trump 24/7. That's something even Trump's personal social media platform can't accomplish.

Additionally, this falls right in line with the same tactics that the Russians (who Trump didn't collude with) used to get votes. They targeted BLM & Hilary ads towards people they knew were anti-Hillary/BLM to keep them motivated and to amp up the Hillary/BLM hate to make sure they voted. This trial is going to have a very similar effect with the Trump base, and have even more widespread appeal among neocons with the added benefit of getting somebody else to do all the work.
 
I think what may end up getting Trump is everything is recorded somehow now, but I bet there have been attempts to erase/delete records. Obstruction of Justice. I doubt Trump would personally obstruct justice, but if they can nail one of his co-conspirators, then maybe somebody will flip. Still in the end I think this lawsuit in particular and the lawsuits in general benefit Trump.

 
IMHO, since Roe v Wade is overturned, then this drug has to come off the market or at least be severally restricted. Too easy for a doc to send via mail or friend/ally send in the mail.

 
IMHO, since Roe v Wade is overturned, then this drug has to come off the market or at least be severally restricted. Too easy for a doc to send via mail or friend/ally send in the mail.

And jail people who go across state lines and obtain/use in a place where it’s legal.

Just like we arrest people from Jersey who go on a trip to Vegas and get high…

Kind of funny that the same general group of people who scream at the top of their lungs when states exert power over a COTUS/SCOTUS issue like guns, will cheer at the top of their lungs when states exert control over what should be a COTUS/SCOTUS issue like abortion.

I guess what really matters is getting tryout way, not consistency in HOW.

And annoying that the SCOTUS would pass the buck to the states on either constitutional issue.
 
Last edited:
Demons don’t exist, so it doesn’t matter what you teach kids about demons.
Just like it doesn’t matter what you teach kids about any god that you may think exists.
It’s all bullshit.
Liberals often go after Christian religions, yet when it comes to people who aren’t christian, all the sudden they “care about other peoples cultures”. I have no problem going after religion, but democrats are selective of what to hate based on politics. Start going after Muslims on social media and you’ll quickly see my point. Muslims are better “Christian’s” than Christian’s are and far more conservative, yet they are in the D club. That’s curious.
 
And jail people who go across state lines and obtain/use in a place where it’s legal.

Just like we arrest people from Jersey who go on a trip to Vegas and get high…

Kind of funny that the same general group of people who scream at the top of their lungs when states exert power over a COTUS/SCOTUS issue like guns, will cheer at the top of their lungs when states exert control over what should be a COTUS/SCOTUS issue like abortion.

I guess what really matters is getting tryout way, not consistency in HOW.

And annoying that the SCOTUS would pass the buck to the states on either constitutional issue.
I don't see how SCOTUS or the States can enforce their abortion bans over it's citizens as long as this drug is available. With technology (namely license plate readers), States will be able to monitor traffic into and out of the State to hunt down abortion trafficking, but monitoring the mail for 5 pills seems like an impossible task.
 
Liberals often go after Christian religions, yet when it comes to people who aren’t christian, all the sudden they “care about other peoples cultures”. I have no problem going after religion, but democrats are selective of what to hate based on politics. Start going after Muslims on social media and you’ll quickly see my point. Muslims are better “Christian’s” than Christian’s are and far more conservative, yet they are in the D club. That’s curious.
It's not curious, it's more identity politics.
 
Coach fired for remarking that biological men have an advantage over biological females in athletics. Fired for stating the obvious.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/*...c8a6e63072f45659d11eb72432bd469&ei=67#image=2
 
It's not curious, it's more identity politics.
identity politics is a religion by all metrics except for the god part. That’s why we get horrible democrats like a Joe Biden for president and smart people who still support him. Same with Trump. I am supremely anti religious, but I’m open to the idea of god, just not the traditional magic man in the sky version. Quantum entanglement, light as waves and particles, theoretical physics, etc. actually can support the idea of a creator depending on perspective, but the second that idea becomes a control method it loses all credibility.
 
The future of warfare is robotic:

"This was Russia’s billion-dollar weapons deal with Iran coming to life in November, 500 miles east of Moscow in the Tatarstan region. Its aim is to domestically build 6,000 drones by summer 2025 — enough to reverse the Russian army’s chronic shortages of unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs, on the front line."

"“Russia has a credible way of building over the next year or so a capability to go from periodically launching tens of imported Shahed-136 kamikaze drones against Ukrainian targets to more regularly attacking with hundreds of them,” Albright told The Post."

"“Those drones are much cheaper to produce compared to the damage they cause, and this is the problem,” Vlasiuk told The Post."

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,092,901
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top