Nah, we can cover it here.
I am assuming you are a man. If you want to conceive a child naturally to carry on your bloodline are you going to choose to butt-slam your buddy Rob and hope for the best or are you just going to have ****** intercourse with a fertile woman since the both of you are already equipped with the correct equipment to do so?
Please explain to me the "Choice" to do this with a fertile woman given that a mans anus is ill-equipped to grow a child and a woman's womb is designed to do that very thing. Explain how that is a choice and not just human nature. Explain to me the other optional holes you can deposit your seed into naturally that will grow a child.
Understand what the "choice" is here. The "choice" is to CONCEIVE A CHILD NATURALLY. So explain the "choices" you have to do that naturally.
‘Seems that someone is REALLY hung up on the puritanical nonsense belief that ****** activity is only for reproduction, and that *** of any kind without reproduction is perversion.
It’s simply wrong, and any adult should know that.
Put away the bullshit religious nonsense for a bit, and and speak again to your choice-but-not-a-choice concept that Jimi alluded to: If there are only two possibilities and one WILL apply, how can one be a choice and one not be a choice?
Substitute ANYTHING for ****** orientation.
You must eat food. You can only eat food that tastes good, or food that does not.
How could it be that eating good food is a choice, but bad food is not?
It’s an impossibility of logic.
If people are either attracted to the same *** or attracted to the opposite ***, how can being attracted to the same *** be “choice”, but attraction to the opposite *** a foregone conclusion?
It’s a logical impossibility.
BTW-Jimis post was satire.