Oh I am sorry, was I not clear enough you old phuck? How many connections do you count? I count 4. Each one outputs a signal. The fact that they output a shared signal is not relevant. Each individual connection still outputs a signal and is therefore an output.That’s not multiple outputs, you ignorant fool. It’s a terminal block that duplicates the same mono output.
A mono amp has only one output. No matter how many terminals you connect to that output, the amp will only play a mono signal at a given wattage for a given load.
This has been proved, yet you still insist your contrary feelings are fact.
He is mono inside with one output and it is the negative output.The truth about Rob is he’s just an ugly person on the inside.
It’s 100% relevant you ignormaus.Oh I am sorry, was I not clear enough you old phuck? How many connections do you count? I count 4. Each one outputs a signal. The fact that they output a shared signal is not relevant. Each individual connection still outputs a signal and is therefore an output.
It's only relevant if your goal is to argue. We aren't talking about a mono amp chip. We are talking about amplifier outputs.It’s 100% relevant you ignormaus.
Go look at a mono amp chip, and tell me how many outputs it has.
Then, tell me how, using a single speaker, you can bridge the “outputs” on your mono amp to get more power than just using a single output.
I’ll wait.
Ahhh, back to the entitled child. Thxone’s feelings are fact. Period. End of discussion.It's only relevant if your goal is to argue. We aren't talking about a mono amp chip. We are talking about amplifier outputs.
Tell you how, using a single speaker.... nobody is even talking about doing that. Now you are trying to create more of an argument. Listen, you connect your speaker wires to amplifier outputs, AKA terminals. Period, end of discussion.
No, facts are facts. You are denying facts. You are ignorant. Moving on Gramps.Ahhh, back to the entitled child. Thxone’s feelings are fact. Period. End of discussion.
Except, you haven’t answered either question. Answering them would prove your feelings are incorrect, so you won’t do it.
Go ahead child, answer my questions.
What amp did he have? It was Pyramid level. I think you may even mentioned it was low quality and the manufacturer exaggerated power specs.But if they're "wired internally" they're "Pyramid type crap crap"...no quality company would do that according to Rob![]()
Afraid to answer two simple questions that will prove you wrong. Funny how that is.No, facts are facts. You are denying facts. You are ignorant. Moving on Gramps.
You are reaching so hard just to argue. You know you are the only person right now trying to argue this crap right? Please let it go before you have a stroke.Afraid to answer two simple questions that will prove you wrong. Funny how that is.
This diagram from Rockford shows a multi-output mono amp, right?
View attachment 47374
Explain the multiple outputs of a mono amp circuit to us. View attachment 47375
I tell you what. YOU explain the circuit to US.Explain the multiple outputs of a mono amp circuit to us. View attachment 47375
Nope. That's why you sound stupid telling someone he's leaving power on the table by not using all terminals on a mono amp.Also, answer this: Does connecting a terminal block to my car battery increase the voltage or amperage it can deliver? If I have two positive and two negative rails, does it now deliver 1500 CCA instead of 750?
I’ll wait.
Single input, single output amplifier circuit. That’s how amplifiers work.I tell you what. YOU explain the circuit to US.
Why won't you stick to the topic. Why do you jump all around?Single input, single output amplifier circuit. That’s how amplifiers work.
Do you think a 9.1 AV receiver has a mono amp split into 9 outputs or 9 mono amps, one for each output?
Another question you won’t answer because it proves you wrong.