Winners only.

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I am being 100% honest. Never had the inclination and thus never had to choose not to do it.
It doesn’t make me any more manly than the other 85%, and it doesn’t make them less manly. It just is what it is.

You know, I never had an inclination to drink gasoline either. So I never had to stop myself or choose not to.
Weird fact: Some pregnant women DO. I knew one who craved the smell, but didn’t want to drink it. She didn’t have to choose not to. Others have to choose.
Science.

Why Rob, why do you make it so hard to talk to you.

Technically, your junk go in a mans anus. I am asking you right now, do you want to put your junk in a man's ***, yes or no?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Why Rob, why do you make it so hard to talk to you.

Technically, your junk go in a mans anus. I am asking you right now, do you want to put your junk in a man's ***, yes or no?

I have said at least five times now that I have no inclination whatsoever. That’s why it isn’t a decision or choice that I would have to make whether to do it or not.
I’m in the 15% club.

And I’ll beat Jimmy to the punch on this one: You reference the junk being put “in”. That would suggest the junk is “in” once it has been “put in”.
Yet there is no plumbing or conduit “in” Jimi’s house walls, and no nerves “in” bone?

You keep changing the rules of how you use words, yet get upset that no one is correctly interpreting what you post?
Uff da.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I have said at least five times now that I have no inclination whatsoever. That’s why it isn’t a decision or choice that I would have to make whether to do it or not.
I’m in the 15% club.

And I’ll beat Jimmy to the punch on this one: You reference the junk being put “in”. That would suggest the junk is “in” once it has been “put in”.
Yet there is no plumbing or conduit “in” Jimi’s house walls, and no nerves “in” bone?

You keep changing the rules of how you use words, yet get upset that no one is correctly interpreting what you post?
Uff da.

See, a simple yes or no and you refuse to answer.

Yeah, the rules change as there are more than one way to use words. Glad you can follow along. Now are you smart enough to pick the use for the word to where it is relevant to this conversation?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I am being 100% honest. Never had the inclination and thus never had to choose not to do it.
It doesn’t make me any more manly than the other 85%, and it doesn’t make them less manly. It just is what it is.

Ironically most the gays I know did consciously try heterosexuality. Didn't stick. So one could consciously try to be something they are not, but you don't have to consciously decide to be something you already are.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

See, a simple yes or no and you refuse to answer.

Yeah, the rules change as there are more than one way to use words. Glad you can follow along. Now are you smart enough to pick the use for the word to where it is relevant to this conversation?

Lemme guess your next play: You never really meant bones have no nerves in them, what you actually meant was bones have no nerves in them.
You know, that very fluid definition of “in” and how you can just change it on the fly.

Oh and stop complaining I didn’t answer a question that I’ve already answered five times. I’ve asked you the same questions half s dozen times and never gotten an answer from you.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Lemme guess your next play: You never really meant bones have no nerves in them, what you actually meant was bones have no nerves in them.
You know, that very fluid definition of “in” and how you can just change it on the fly.

Yet another post where YOU refuse to answer any questions.

Time to change topics. On the record you are afraid to answer the gay question and you don't want to answer the comprehension and proper word use question.

Feel free to pick the next, different topic Rob. I am game.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Yet another post where YOU refuse to answer any questions.

Time to change topics. On the record you are afraid to answer the gay question and you don't want to answer the comprehension and proper word use question.

Feel free to pick the next, different topic Rob. I am game.

Sorry kid, you’re not bright enough to even ATTEMPT the old bait-and-switch with me.

You basically tried to backpedal out of your failure to understand basic anatomy. A failure that you absolutely BURIED yourself in with each successive post about it. Your attempt to use semantics as your excuse was actually thwarted by you, in your own post.
And now you try to spin it like I’m hiding info or refusing to answer questions. That’s just silly, and you know it.

On the bright side, you admitted to having ****** thoughts or feelings for men. And no one gives a damn.
Ironic, given your constant attempts to use homosexual innuendo as “insults”, but again: no one cares.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Sorry kid, you’re not bright enough to even ATTEMPT the old bait-and-switch with me.

You basically tried to backpedal out of your failure to understand basic anatomy. A failure that you absolutely BURIED yourself in with each successive post about it. Your attempt to use semantics as your excuse was actually thwarted by you, in your own post.

On the bright side, you admitted to having ****** thoughts or feelings for men. And no one gives a damn.
Ironic, given your constant attempts to use homosexual innuendo as “insults”, but again: no one cares.

See, can't let shit go, can't move on. You have to make people think you won something. You won nothing, you gained nothing. You can try to spin and flip shit but you got NOTHING.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Lemme guess your next play: You never really meant bones have no nerves in them, what you actually meant was bones have no nerves in them.
You know, that very fluid definition of “in” and how you can just change it on the fly.

Oh and stop complaining I didn’t answer a question that I’ve already answered five times. I’ve asked you the same questions half s dozen times and never gotten an answer from you.

I'm glad you mentioned that. Perhaps the issue with the "ghey question" is that Thx isn't using the standard meaning of conscious decision.

When I say somebody is making a conscious decision I'm using the words in the following manner.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conscious <<--- #5

done or acting with critical awareness
example: a conscious effort to do better

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/decision <<--- #1b

a determination arrived at after consideration
example: made the decision to attend graduate school

Of equal importance in this discussion is the definition of subconscious.

Definition of SUBCONSCIOUS

existing in the mind but not immediately available to consciousness… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

existing in the mind but not immediately available to consciousness

So, for example, when I met my wife the attraction happened on a completely subconscious level. This may be confusing to some people because (of course) I am aware or conscious that I'm attracted to her, but that doesn't mean I made a conscious effort or decision to be attracted to her (different definitions of conscious). Therefore, I'm certain that gheys are conscious that they're ghey, but that doesn't mean they've made a conscious decision in the traditional meaning of the phrase.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conscious <<--- #2

perceiving, apprehending, or noticing with a degree of controlled thought or observation
conscious of having succeeded.

Since I'm subconsciously attracted to some women and not others, it seems reasonable to assume others can also experience attraction on a subconscious level.

TBH, the thought of having to actively participate the process of attraction strikes me as rather daunting. I remember going on "check list" dates, where my date was measuring me against a list of desired attributes. Didn't take too long to figure out it was best to just lose their numbers. Now that I think about it they were trying to make a conscious decision about whether to be attracted to me, which strikes me as silly as me "deciding" I'm attracted to men.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

No, you two are trying to make it complicated when it doesn't need to be complicated. Couple that with Rob's refusal to answer the questions. I am used to this. You can't question a liberal, they will dance around it before they try misdirection and then a completely different topic.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

No, you two are trying to make it complicated when it doesn't need to be complicated. Couple that with Rob's refusal to answer the questions. I am used to this. You can't question a liberal, they will dance around it before they try misdirection and then a completely different topic.

I'd say you're the one who is making this complicated. Are you ESL??? I'm still confused about the nerves and bones, in the non-medical sense. How is one to answer the question when you're using a different dictionary? Even if one was to answer the question, they would have no idea what you would make of the answer.

For example, if you were to ask where you should mount your amp, I cannot answer "in your trunk," because I'm not exactly sure what that would mean to you. Would the amp have to be welded into the trunk to count as "in" the trunk? I wouldn't advise welding amps into the trunk.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I'd say you're the one who is making this complicated. Are you ESL??? I'm still confused about the nerves and bones, in the non-medical sense. How is one to answer the question when you're using a different dictionary? Even if one was to answer the question, they would have no idea what you would make of the answer.

For example, if you were to ask where you should mount your amp, I cannot answer "in your trunk," because I'm not exactly sure what that would mean to you. Would the amp have to be welded into the trunk to count as "in" the trunk? I wouldn't advise welding amps into the trunk.

May I suggest more in person interactions with live people.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

It's a official.

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

No, you two are trying to make it complicated when it doesn't need to be complicated. Couple that with Rob's refusal to answer the questions. I am used to this. You can't question a liberal, they will dance around it before they try misdirection and then a completely different topic.

You complicate it by not using the same meaning for the same word in different sentences.

But, your questions have been answered in spades. Maybe ask me new ones so I don’t have to repeat myself five times.
And while you’re thinking of new ones, maybe answer, for the FIRST time, the questions asked if you.

Quid pro quo, kid.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Not good. Hopefully it was an accident and a calculated move on Putin's part.

MSN

www.msn.com