Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Right and in the meantime you get to claim your guy won even if he didn't cause that is what it really comes down too. Getting that trophy.
Until proved otherwise, he DID win. That’s pretty much how it’s worked since the very first election, and ever since there was a “winner” of any type.
You new?

So it IS exactly how I said it is. Do you just like saying no or something???
When you make a claim or an inference about me that is incorrect, I certainly will say no to the accuracy of the claim.
Who will the proof be shown to? Those who committed the fraud? Those controlled by the ones who committed the fraud? Those scared to do anything with the evidence for fear of losing their jobs, their livelihood, being canceled? Now where do you think that will get anyone?
You’re talking in circles to avoid showing us the proof of this massive conspiracy. You are sure it happened. Show us the proof you are relying on to form your opinion.
I wouldn't know. Why don't you tell us how much you make as a fluffer.
Nice try at diversion.
If you have the proof, you could make great money with it.
Since money is irrelevant to you, share the proof here. Maybe one or several of us can make the money instead.
 
Last edited:
‘It is creating copyright chaos, is supercharging concerns around digital privacy and surveillance, could be used to increase the ability of hackers to break cyberdefenses and is allowing governments to deploy deadly weapons that can kill without human control.’

AI social credit score system coming to micromanage your every decision:


@Eggs
 
Last edited:
Until proved otherwise, he DID win. That’s pretty much how it’s worked since the very first election, and ever since there was a “winner” of any type.
You new?
I don't think so. It took a while for them to figure out the best ways to cheat and get away with it.
When you make a claim or an inference about me that is incorrect, I certainly will say no to the accuracy of the claim.
Nothing I stated was untrue. You gather information then make decisions based on that information.
Perhaps YOU are new?
You’re talking in circles to avoid showing us the proof of this massive conspiracy. You are sure it happened. Show us the proof you are relying on to form your opinion.
Straight as an arrow. No need to show proof to the likes of you. Any proof you see will be ignored or argued by you. You have proven this many times over.
Nice try at diversion.
If you have the proof, you could make great money with it.
Since money is irrelevant to you, share the proof here. Maybe one or several of us can make the money instead.
Your psychological ploys will never work on me. I am not driven by greed or the thought of potential monetary gains. We see what drives you though as you jump right into the money bit. If they were relevant or real, how many deadly sins are you currently guilty of? lol.
 
I don't think so. It took a while for them to figure out the best ways to cheat and get away with it.
Yes, and people “think” a perpetual motion machine exists.
Yet no one can demonstrate one.
Nothing I stated was untrue. You gather information then make decisions based on that information.
Perhaps YOU are new?
I forgot English is not a strong suit, or maybe even your first language. Using quotes around the word evidence infers that it does not exist or is fabricated.
The evidence is provided by the defendant and verified with them directly, so it can’t be fabricated.
So, your statement is wrong.

Straight as an arrow. No need to show proof to the likes of you. Any proof you see will be ignored or argued by you. You have proven this many times over.
Interesting claim, when you haven’t provided any proof yet.
One of the only things I can recall you providing proof of, was when you share a picture that showed nerves in bones (to support your theory that there are no nerves in bones).
Go ahead and share some proof of the massive voter fraud conspiracy. I’m all eyes.
Your psychological ploys will never work on me. I am not driven by greed or the thought of potential monetary gains. We see what drives you though as you jump right into the money bit. If they were relevant or real, how many deadly sins are you currently guilty of? lol.
You think asking for proof of a claim is a “psychological ploy”?
I do like money. A LOT. It’s the easiest thing to use when you have bills to pay and things to purchase.

Creditors and stores really seem to like it, versus offering them a goat or pig, or maybe a felled oak tree.
Weird how that capitalism thing worked out.
 
Last edited:
Yes, and people “think” a perpetual motion machine exists.
Yet no one can demonstrate one.
Cool.
I forgot English is not a strong suit, or maybe even your first language. Using quotes around the word evidence infers that it does not exist or is fabricated.
The evidence is provided by the defendant and verified with them directly, so it can’t be fabricated.
So, your statement is wrong.
So you are saying you don't know how to do your own job. Got it.
Interesting claim, when you haven’t provided any proof yet.
One of the only things I can recall you providing proof of, was when you share a picture that showed nerves in bones (to support your theory that there are no nerves in bones).
Go ahead and share some proof of the massive voter fraud conspiracy. I’m all eyes.
Mhmm.
You think asking for proof of a claim is a “psychological ploy”?
I do like money. A LOT. It’s the easiest thing to use when you have bills to pay and things to purchase.
Yeah, that's what it was. It was the asking for proof and not the saying I could make money.
Creditors and stores really seem to like it, versus offering them a goat or pig, or maybe a felled oak tree.
Weird how that capitalism thing worked out.
Yeah, weird.
 
Cool.

So you are saying you don't know how to do your own job. Got it.
You think it’s my job to fabricate evidence? Not a very intelligent assumption, for sure.
Mhmm.

Yeah, that's what it was. It was the asking for proof and not the saying I could make money.
So you have no proof, then.
And neither does anyone else.
And no one has even provided anything resembling believable testimony.
And the logistics show it’s pretty much impossible.
But you believe it anyway. Simply because you WANT it to be true.
Yep.
Yeah, weird.
 
You think it’s my job to fabricate evidence? Not a very intelligent assumption, for sure.
I think you are a far left leaning criminal. You support your own kind.
So you have no proof, then.
And neither does anyone else.
And no one has even provided anything resembling believable testimony.
And the logistics show it’s pretty much impossible.
But you believe it anyway. Simply because you WANT it to be true.
Yep.
You have no proof. What you have said is nothing more than conjecture and speculation.
 
I think you are a far left leaning criminal. You support your own kind.
The judges say you are wrong. And so do the people I prosecute.
You have no proof. What you have said is nothing more than conjecture and speculation.
The proof is right in this forum. There is not one post where you have provided evidence or direct access to evidence of the massive voter fraud conspiracy theory you believe in.
That’s not conjecture or speculation. It’s verifiable fact.
A link to every post you’ve made.
Not one includes the proof or evidence of the conspiracy, just your feelings:
 
The judges say you are wrong. And so do the people I prosecute.
Really, Judges say you are not a criminal and the people who's lives you ruin say you are not a criminal? Interesting... how do they know?
The proof is right in this forum. There is not one post where you have provided evidence or direct access to evidence of the massive voter fraud conspiracy theory you believe in.
That’s not conjecture or speculation. It’s verifiable fact.
A link to every post you’ve made.
Not one includes the proof or evidence of the conspiracy, just your feelings:
You see what you want to see and ignore anything that proves you wrong. It will always be pointless to provide you with any proof of anything. You are that guy Rob.
 
Really, Judges say you are not a criminal and the people who's lives you ruin say you are not a criminal? Interesting... how do they know?
The judges and the criminals I prosecute say my evidence is not fabricated.
You think it’s “ruining a life” to stop someone from stealing money?
Interesting.
Do you find other crime acceptable, or just financial crime?
You see what you want to see and ignore anything that proves you wrong. It will always be pointless to provide you with any proof of anything. You are that guy Rob.
And there you are at post #12,637 still not having seen or provided us with a single shred of evidence of this massive conspiracy fantasy. Yet you believe it wholeheartedly because the old orange man told you to.
 
The judges and the criminals I prosecute say my evidence is not fabricated.
You think it’s “ruining a life” to stop someone from stealing money?
Interesting.
Do you find other crime acceptable, or just financial crime?
I promise you that the number of criminals is not 100% of the people you convict. Some of those people committed no crimes. Some of the lives you ruin were clerical errors.
And there you are at post #12,637 still not having seen or provided us with a single shred of evidence of this massive conspiracy fantasy. Yet you believe it wholeheartedly because the old orange man told you to.
If you say so. You can keep counting all you want. There is nothing a secretary such as yourself can do with proof so you don't need proof.
 
I promise you that the number of criminals is not 100% of the people you convict. Some of those people committed no crimes. Some of the lives you ruin were clerical errors.
And your promise carries no weight whatsoever.
There is no “clerical error” that causes a person to lie on their paperwork, and then confirm that lie in an interview multiple times.
You should learn some facts instead of living by your feelings.
If you say so. You can keep counting all you want. There is nothing a secretary such as yourself can do with proof so you don't need proof.
In other words, you can’t provide the proof that you claimed you provided, but never actually did.
That makes you a liar.

You are living by feelings while derogatorily accusing people of living by feelings.
That makes you a hypocrite.
 
And your promise carries no weight whatsoever.
There is no “clerical error” that causes a person to lie on their paperwork, and then confirm that lie in an interview multiple times.
You should learn some facts instead of living by your feelings.
It's a fact that people make mistakes. You think a mistake is a lie.
In other words, you can’t provide the proof that you claimed you provided, but never actually did.
That makes you a liar.

You are living by feelings while derogatorily accusing people of living by feelings.
That makes you a hypocrite.
Man you sure can come up with wild conclusions at the drop of a hat.
 
7mm4nj.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
968,770
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_1882.jpeg

slater

    Oct 4, 2025
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20251004_120904_Photo Translator.jpg

1aespinoza

    Oct 4, 2025
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top